SEKAR REPORTER Blog

this Court is of the considered viewthat the age of superannuation as prescribed under regulation 2.12 is binding on the third respondent University and any other prescription of age of superannuation repugnant to the AICTE regulation is to be held void and inoperative and it cannot be enforced in law.     THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN  W.P. Nos.17918 and 17929 of 2021  W.P.No.17918 of 2021

this Court is of the considered viewthat the age of superannuation as prescribed under regulation 2.12 is binding on the third respondent University and any other prescription of age of superannuation repugnant to the AICTE regulation is to be held void and inoperative and it cannot be enforced in law. THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN W.P. Nos.17918 and 17929 of 2021 W.P.No.17918 of 2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on 28.03.2022 Delivered on 12.04.2022 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN W.P. Nos.17918 and 17929 of 2021 W.P.No.17918 of 2021 Dr.S.Kothandaraman Vs 1      The Pro-Chancellor Puducherry...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
அயோத்தியா மண்டபம் திறக்கப்பட்டு பூஜைகள் செய்ய அனுமதிக்கப்பட்டுள்ளதாகவும், பள்ளியை தொடவில்லை என்றும், கல்யாண மண்டபத்தை அவர்களே பயன்படுத்தலாம். Ag undertaking recorded by mhc . Case posted 21st april

அயோத்தியா மண்டபம் திறக்கப்பட்டு பூஜைகள் செய்ய அனுமதிக்கப்பட்டுள்ளதாகவும், பள்ளியை தொடவில்லை என்றும், கல்யாண மண்டபத்தை அவர்களே பயன்படுத்தலாம். Ag undertaking recorded by mhc . Case posted 21st april

சென்னை மேற்கு மாம்பலத்தில் ஸ்ரீ ராம் சமாஜ் என்ற அமைப்பின் மூலம் அயோத்யா மண்டபம் 1954 ஆம் ஆண்டு கட்டப்பட்டு, நிர்வகிக்கப்பட்டு வந்தது. அந்த அமைப்பு நிதி முறைகேடுகளில் ஈடுபடுவதாக புகார்கள் எழுந்த நிலையில், அயோத்யா மண்டபத்தை கடந்த 2013ஆம் ஆண்டு இந்து சமய அறநிலையத்துறை கீழ்...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
[4/12, 11:13] Illaya Perumal Advt: PNPJ & AANJ, ITEM NO.4, WRIT PETITIONS ARE ALLOWED [4/12, 11:19] Illaya Perumal Advt: Matter relates to Bar Council. Disciplinary Comittee has rejected L R Petitions   and closed the DCC proceedings. As against the Rejection  of LR Petitions and closure of DCC proceedings, two Petitions have been filed and the same are allowed by the Honorable   DB headed by PNPJ & AANJ.

[4/12, 11:13] Illaya Perumal Advt: PNPJ & AANJ, ITEM NO.4, WRIT PETITIONS ARE ALLOWED [4/12, 11:19] Illaya Perumal Advt: Matter relates to Bar Council. Disciplinary Comittee has rejected L R Petitions and closed the DCC proceedings. As against the Rejection of LR Petitions and closure of DCC proceedings, two Petitions have been filed and the same are allowed by the Honorable DB headed by PNPJ & AANJ.

[4/12, 11:13] Illaya Perumal Advt: PNPJ & AANJ, ITEM NO.4, WRIT PETITIONS ARE ALLOWED [4/12, 11:19] Illaya Perumal Advt: Matter relates to Bar Council. Disciplinary Comittee has rejected L R Petitions and closed the...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
[4/12, 08:36] G Karuppasamy pandiyan, Advocate.: Since the respondent has violated the mandatory requirements contemplated under Section 42 of the Food safety and standards  Act 2006,this Court has no other option except to quash the very launching of prosecution.   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR  Crl.O.P.(MD)No.5994 of 2019 and  Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.3871 and 3872 of 2019

[4/12, 08:36] G Karuppasamy pandiyan, Advocate.: Since the respondent has violated the mandatory requirements contemplated under Section 42 of the Food safety and standards Act 2006,this Court has no other option except to quash the very launching of prosecution. THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR Crl.O.P.(MD)No.5994 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.3871 and 3872 of 2019

[4/12, 08:36] G Karuppasamy pandiyan, Advocate.: Since the respondent has violated the mandatory requirements contemplated under Section 42 of the Food safety and standards Act 2006,this Court has no other option except to quash...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Madras high court april 10th orders

Madras high court april 10th orders

  [4/11, 12:25] Sekarreporter: அதிமுக பொது செயலாளர் பதவியிலிருந்து நீக்கியதை எதிர்த்து வி.கே.சசிகலா தொடர்ந்த வழக்கை நிராகரிக்க கோரிய பன்னீர் செல்வம், எடப்பாடி பழனிச்சாமி மனுகளை ஏற்று சென்னை உரிமையில் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவு…. சசிகலாவை கட்சியை விட்டு நீக்கிய அதிமுக பொது குழு தீர்மானம் செல்லும்...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
division benchof the Hon’ble High Court Madras directed the school to collect 75%fees for 2020-2021 academic year,and 85%for 2021-2022 from the previous year fees fixed i.e from 2019-2020 in respect of all schools who have not submitted records on time. Order passed by TRJ WP No 25162 of 2021 For Petitioner School P Ebenezer Paul Advocate.

division benchof the Hon’ble High Court Madras directed the school to collect 75%fees for 2020-2021 academic year,and 85%for 2021-2022 from the previous year fees fixed i.e from 2019-2020 in respect of all schools who have not submitted records on time. Order passed by TRJ WP No 25162 of 2021 For Petitioner School P Ebenezer Paul Advocate.

I Fee committee rejected applications as records were not submitted before 17-05-2021 as per fee committee circular. The 17-05-2021 circular made by fee committee is unreasonable as there was 2nd wave of pandemic and...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
A Division Bench of Hon’ble High Court, Madras comprising of Justice P.N. Prakash & Justice A. A. Nakkiran convicted Allikuttai Radhakrishnan to undergo 4 Weeks Simple imprisonment for each of the 4 charges framed under the Contempts of Court Act and further sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 2000 for each charge, today (11-4-2022) in Contempt petition No.1135/2020. The Contempt case was filed against the hundreds of false Public Interest litigation (PIL) filed by Allikuttai Radhakrishnan, over the past several years.

A Division Bench of Hon’ble High Court, Madras comprising of Justice P.N. Prakash & Justice A. A. Nakkiran convicted Allikuttai Radhakrishnan to undergo 4 Weeks Simple imprisonment for each of the 4 charges framed under the Contempts of Court Act and further sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 2000 for each charge, today (11-4-2022) in Contempt petition No.1135/2020. The Contempt case was filed against the hundreds of false Public Interest litigation (PIL) filed by Allikuttai Radhakrishnan, over the past several years.

ÔI A Division Bench of Hon’ble High Court, Madras comprising of Justice P.N. Prakash & Justice A. A. Nakkiran convicted Allikuttai Radhakrishnan to undergo 4 Weeks Simple imprisonment for each of the 4 charges...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version