SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (g)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.   In the result, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered. 30.07.2021 RR M.DHANDAPANI,J. RR Crl.O.P.No.12546 of 2021 30.07.2021

Uncategorized

 by · Published June 28, 2022

learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (g)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.   In the result, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered. 30.07.2021 RR M.DHANDAPANI,J. RR Crl.O.P.No.12546 of 2021 30.07.2021

  Crl.O.P.No.12546 of 2021 M.DHANDAPANI, J. The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 147, 323, 347, 384 and 420 IPC in Crime No.4...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Admk contempt copy THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (APPELLATE SIDE)   CONT.P. No.                        of 2022 In C.M.P.No.     of 2022 In O.S.A.No.                  of 2022 In   O.A.No.328 of 2022 In C.S.No.111 of 2012 M.Shanmugam, 1268D, Solvalakshmi Nagar, K Chettipalayam, Ayyampalayam Road, KNP Colony Post, Veerapandi, Tiruppur, Tamil Nadu – 641 605                        ….PETITIONER/ APPELLANT Vs All India Anna DravidaMunnetraKazhagam, Rep. by its Co-Ordinator and Joint Co-Ordinator Thiru.O.Panneerselvam and Thiru.E.Palaniswamy, having office at No.226/275, Avvai Shanmugam Salai, Royapettah, Chennai-600 014. The General Council of the Central Organisation, All India Anna DravidaMunnetraKazhagam Rep. by its Co-Ordinator and Joint Co-Ordinator, Thiru.O.Panneerselvam and Thiru.E.Palaniswamy, having office at No.226/275, Avvai Shanmugam Salai, Royapettah, Chennai-600 014. The Central Executive Committee,

Uncategorized

 by · Published June 28, 2022

Admk contempt copy THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (APPELLATE SIDE)   CONT.P. No.                        of 2022 In C.M.P.No.     of 2022 In O.S.A.No.                  of 2022 In   O.A.No.328 of 2022 In C.S.No.111 of 2012 M.Shanmugam, 1268D, Solvalakshmi Nagar, K Chettipalayam, Ayyampalayam Road, KNP Colony Post, Veerapandi, Tiruppur, Tamil Nadu – 641 605                        ….PETITIONER/ APPELLANT Vs All India Anna DravidaMunnetraKazhagam, Rep. by its Co-Ordinator and Joint Co-Ordinator Thiru.O.Panneerselvam and Thiru.E.Palaniswamy, having office at No.226/275, Avvai Shanmugam Salai, Royapettah, Chennai-600 014. The General Council of the Central Organisation, All India Anna DravidaMunnetraKazhagam Rep. by its Co-Ordinator and Joint Co-Ordinator, Thiru.O.Panneerselvam and Thiru.E.Palaniswamy, having office at No.226/275, Avvai Shanmugam Salai, Royapettah, Chennai-600 014. The Central Executive Committee,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (APPELLATE SIDE)   CONT.P. No.                        of 2022 In C.M.P.No.     of 2022 In O.S.A.No.                  of 2022 In   O.A.No.328 of 2022 In C.S.No.111 of 2012  ...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN S.A.(MD)No.289 of 2007 Thulasiammal (died)                       … Appellant  / I am not persuaded by the contentions of the learned counsel appearing for the appellant. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents drew my attention —Appellants       : Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai   for Mr.P.Adhimoola Pandian                                  For R1                      : Mr.S.Srinivasa Raghavan  for Mr.M.Jothibasu                                  For R3                : No appearance    (R2-died & R4-given up)  JUDGMENT

Uncategorized

 by · Published June 28, 2022

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN S.A.(MD)No.289 of 2007 Thulasiammal (died)                       … Appellant  / I am not persuaded by the contentions of the learned counsel appearing for the appellant. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents drew my attention —Appellants       : Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai   for Mr.P.Adhimoola Pandian                                  For R1                      : Mr.S.Srinivasa Raghavan  for Mr.M.Jothibasu                                  For R3                : No appearance    (R2-died & R4-given up)  JUDGMENT

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT RESERVED ON : 02.011.2021 PRONOUNCED ON: 26.04.2022 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN S.A.(MD)No.289 of 2007 Thulasiammal (died)                       … Appellant  / 1st Respondent / Plaintiff Senthamarai Venkatesh...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Thus, this Court do not find any perversity or infirmity in respect of the decision taken by the State Bank of India based on the policy decision of the Government of India, which was adopted by the Indian Bank Association. Smsj mhc. For Petitioners   : M/s.R.Vaigai                                                                Senior Advocate                                                                For M/s.Anna Mathew                               For Respondents                               For R1 and R2     :  Mr.Om Prakash                                                                Senior Advocate                                                                For Mr.K.Chandrasekar                               For R4                    :  Mr.S.Rajesh                                                                For Mr.Karthik Ranganathan                               For R3                    : No appearance                                                                ORDER

Uncategorized

 by · Published June 28, 2022

Thus, this Court do not find any perversity or infirmity in respect of the decision taken by the State Bank of India based on the policy decision of the Government of India, which was adopted by the Indian Bank Association. Smsj mhc. For Petitioners   : M/s.R.Vaigai                                                                Senior Advocate                                                                For M/s.Anna Mathew                               For Respondents                               For R1 and R2     :  Mr.Om Prakash                                                                Senior Advocate                                                                For Mr.K.Chandrasekar                               For R4                    :  Mr.S.Rajesh                                                                For Mr.Karthik Ranganathan                               For R3                    : No appearance                                                                ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS   DATED  : 24.06.2022   CORAM   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.11991 of 2014 and M.P.No.2 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2015 and W.M.P.No.8869 of 2018...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version