SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP Crl.O.P.No.6694 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.Nos.3703 & 3705 of 2019 M/s. Vishaal Natural Food Products (I). For Petitioners        : Mr.B.Satish Sundar         For Respondent      : Mr.R.Nalliyappan. [8/3, 18:12] Satis Sunder Mhc Advocate: Judgement of sathikumar kurup.j.quasing complaint under s.138 N.I act holding that security cheque given by the accused to complainant during course of business without a contract between them is not an enforceable debt within the meaning of s.138 of the said act.Proceeding of the lower court quashed. [8/3, 18:12] Sekarreporter1: Super

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 3, 2022

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP Crl.O.P.No.6694 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.Nos.3703 & 3705 of 2019 M/s. Vishaal Natural Food Products (I). For Petitioners        : Mr.B.Satish Sundar         For Respondent      : Mr.R.Nalliyappan. [8/3, 18:12] Satis Sunder Mhc Advocate: Judgement of sathikumar kurup.j.quasing complaint under s.138 N.I act holding that security cheque given by the accused to complainant during course of business without a contract between them is not an enforceable debt within the meaning of s.138 of the said act.Proceeding of the lower court quashed. [8/3, 18:12] Sekarreporter1: Super

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Order Reserved On:  08.04.2022 Order Delivered On:   .07.2022 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP Crl.O.P.No.6694 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.Nos.3703 & 3705 of 2019 M/s....

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.A.No.592 of 2021 Moorthi              … Appellant Before parting with the case, this court places on record its appreciation to the Learned Counsel for the appellant, who despite all the facts stacked against the appellant/accused, had left no stone unturned to defend the accused by raising all the points, but still arguing in a manner befitting as the officer of this Court. 29.07.2022. For Appellant             : Mr.S.Subramaniya   for Mr.S.Sathish Rajan                                  For Respondent         : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar   Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 3, 2022

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.A.No.592 of 2021 Moorthi              … Appellant Before parting with the case, this court places on record its appreciation to the Learned Counsel for the appellant, who despite all the facts stacked against the appellant/accused, had left no stone unturned to defend the accused by raising all the points, but still arguing in a manner befitting as the officer of this Court. 29.07.2022. For Appellant             : Mr.S.Subramaniya   for Mr.S.Sathish Rajan                                  For Respondent         : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar   Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 29.07.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.A.No.592 of 2021 Moorthi              … Appellant   Versus The State of Tamilnadu represented by Inspector of...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Madras high court august 2nd 8 orders round up

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 3, 2022

Madras high court august 2nd 8 orders round up

[8/2, 11:02] Sekarreporter1: எடப்பாடி பழனிசாமி வழக்கில் அறப்போர் இயக்கத்திற்கு நோட்டீஸ்…. சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் ரூ. 1.10 கோடிய மான நஷ்ட ஈடு கோரி அறப்போர் இயக்கத்திற்கு எதிராக எடப்பாடி வழக்கு அறப்போர் இயக்கத்திற்கு தடை விதிக்க மறுத்த சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம், நோட்டீஸ் அனுப்பிய...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Grsj order 10.For all these reasons, the impugned decision of the third respondent not to revert to the earlier pattern but to follow the new pattern is set aside. The third respondent is directed to conduct the typewriting examinations by calling upon the candidates to write the first paper first (speed test) followed by the second paper (manuscript).    The writ petition is allowed.For Petitioner          :  Mr.L.Shaji Chellan  For Respondents :  Mr.Prakash, Additional Government Pleader

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 3, 2022

Grsj order 10.For all these reasons, the impugned decision of the third respondent not to revert to the earlier pattern but to follow the new pattern is set aside. The third respondent is directed to conduct the typewriting examinations by calling upon the candidates to write the first paper first (speed test) followed by the second paper (manuscript).    The writ petition is allowed.For Petitioner          :  Mr.L.Shaji Chellan  For Respondents :  Mr.Prakash, Additional Government Pleader

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED  :  02.08.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P(MD)No.16506 of 2022 and WMP(MD)Nos.11930 & 11932 of 2022   Tamilnadu Typewriting Shorthand Computer Institutes Sangam, Registraion No.18/2018,...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Mhc list pdf august 3

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 2, 2022

Mhc list pdf august 3

List.  Madras high court august 3rd list     [pdf-embedder url=”https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/03-Aug-2022-List.pdf” title=”03 Aug 2022 List”]

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version