SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Full order of THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR W.P.Nos.16330, 16784, 16336, 16334, 16466, 16339, 16342, 16345, 16351, 16785, 16349, 16479, 16793, 16471, 16352, 16464, 16790, 17451, 17464, 17467 and 17477 of 2022 of 2022 and WMP.Nos.16095, 15658, 15661, 15744, 15747, 15664, 15667, 15660, 15753, 15653, 15669, 15655, 15659, 15761, 16094, 16099, 16100, 16751, 16768, 16770 and 16777 of 2022 W.P.No.16330 of 2022 J.Kalaichelvi                                                            ..           Petitioner vs. 1.The Chairman & Managing Diretor,    Tamil Nadu Electricity Generation &      Distribution Corporation,     For Petitioners            : Mr.A.E.Chelliah, Senior Counsel           in all W.Ps.                                        for Mrs.C.Vasanthakumari Chelliah                 For Respondents                    : Mr.P.S.Raman, Senior Counsel           in all W.Ps.                                    For Mr.P.Subramanian,                                                   Standing Counsel for TNEB  

Uncategorized

 by · Published September 12, 2022

Full order of THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR W.P.Nos.16330, 16784, 16336, 16334, 16466, 16339, 16342, 16345, 16351, 16785, 16349, 16479, 16793, 16471, 16352, 16464, 16790, 17451, 17464, 17467 and 17477 of 2022 of 2022 and WMP.Nos.16095, 15658, 15661, 15744, 15747, 15664, 15667, 15660, 15753, 15653, 15669, 15655, 15659, 15761, 16094, 16099, 16100, 16751, 16768, 16770 and 16777 of 2022 W.P.No.16330 of 2022 J.Kalaichelvi                                                            ..           Petitioner vs. 1.The Chairman & Managing Diretor,    Tamil Nadu Electricity Generation &      Distribution Corporation,     For Petitioners            : Mr.A.E.Chelliah, Senior Counsel           in all W.Ps.                                        for Mrs.C.Vasanthakumari Chelliah                 For Respondents                    : Mr.P.S.Raman, Senior Counsel           in all W.Ps.                                    For Mr.P.Subramanian,                                                   Standing Counsel for TNEB  

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON:  11.07.2022                                     DELIVERED ON: 06.09.2022                    CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR W.P.Nos.16330, 16784, 16336, 16334, 16466, 16339, 16342, 16345, 16351, 16785, 16349,...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR Crl.O.P. No.14556 of 2022 Rajesh Das, IPS    . Petitioner. For Petitioner  :  Mr.S.Elambharathi      for Mr.M.Vijaya Mahanath                                  For Respondent        : Mr.E.Raj Thilak,      Additional Public Prosecutor O R D E R

Uncategorized

 by · Published September 12, 2022

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR Crl.O.P. No.14556 of 2022 Rajesh Das, IPS    . Petitioner. For Petitioner  :  Mr.S.Elambharathi      for Mr.M.Vijaya Mahanath                                  For Respondent        : Mr.E.Raj Thilak,      Additional Public Prosecutor O R D E R

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26.08.2022 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR Crl.O.P. No.14556 of 2022 Rajesh Das, IPS                                       … Petitioner Vs. The State, Rep. by Superintendent...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
FAQ ON RE-OPENING OF TRAN  Based on the directions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, in the GST portal, the facility to file / revise TRAN-1 / TRAN-2 returns, is going to be re-opened during the period from 01.10.2022 to 30.11.2022, to claim eligible transitional credits under Section 140 of the GST Acts, which were not

Uncategorized

 by · Published September 12, 2022

FAQ ON RE-OPENING OF TRAN  Based on the directions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, in the GST portal, the facility to file / revise TRAN-1 / TRAN-2 returns, is going to be re-opened during the period from 01.10.2022 to 30.11.2022, to claim eligible transitional credits under Section 140 of the GST Acts, which were not

FAQ ON RE-OPENING OF TRAN Based on the directions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, in the GST portal, the facility to file / revise TRAN-1 / TRAN-2 returns, is going to be re-opened during...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Sekarreporter1: https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/2022/09/11/9-11-1034-duraivaiyapuri-mhc-advt-justice-v-ramasubramanian-judgment-in-writ-petition-nos-27809-to-27811-and-27973-to-27975-of-2014-dated-05-11-2014-at-madras-high-court-it-should-be-pointed-ou/ [9/11, 10:42] Sekarreporter1: [9/11, 10:34] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: Justice V.Ramasubramanian judgment in Writ Petition Nos.27809 to 27811 and 27973 to 27975 of 2014 dated 05.11.2014 at Madras High Court: –

Uncategorized

 by · Published September 11, 2022

Sekarreporter1: https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/2022/09/11/9-11-1034-duraivaiyapuri-mhc-advt-justice-v-ramasubramanian-judgment-in-writ-petition-nos-27809-to-27811-and-27973-to-27975-of-2014-dated-05-11-2014-at-madras-high-court-it-should-be-pointed-ou/ [9/11, 10:42] Sekarreporter1: [9/11, 10:34] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: Justice V.Ramasubramanian judgment in Writ Petition Nos.27809 to 27811 and 27973 to 27975 of 2014 dated 05.11.2014 at Madras High Court: –

[9/11, 10:42] Sekarreporter1: https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/2022/09/11/9-11-1034-duraivaiyapuri-mhc-advt-justice-v-ramasubramanian-judgment-in-writ-petition-nos-27809-to-27811-and-27973-to-27975-of-2014-dated-05-11-2014-at-madras-high-court-it-should-be-pointed-ou/ [9/11, 10:42] Sekarreporter1: [9/11, 10:34] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: Justice V.Ramasubramanian judgment in Writ Petition Nos.27809 to 27811 and 27973 to 27975 of 2014 dated 05.11.2014 at Madras High Court: –...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Justice Abdul Quddhose opined that the petitioner should have taken up the matter with the Administrative Tribunal dealing with service matters and not approach the High Court in the first instance. No Government servant will be entitled to approach the High Court as a Court of first instance challenging an order passed by the Government regarding a service matter. For Petitioner        : Mr.M.Ravi                                  For Respondents 1 to 3 & 5                  : Mr.Sankaranarayanan,   Additional Solictor General   Assisted by   Ms.R.Hemalatha, CGSC For Respondent 4       : Ms.R.Vaigai, Senior Advocate,   for M/s.Anna Mathew

Uncategorized

 by · Published September 11, 2022

Justice Abdul Quddhose opined that the petitioner should have taken up the matter with the Administrative Tribunal dealing with service matters and not approach the High Court in the first instance. No Government servant will be entitled to approach the High Court as a Court of first instance challenging an order passed by the Government regarding a service matter. For Petitioner        : Mr.M.Ravi                                  For Respondents 1 to 3 & 5                  : Mr.Sankaranarayanan,   Additional Solictor General   Assisted by   Ms.R.Hemalatha, CGSC For Respondent 4       : Ms.R.Vaigai, Senior Advocate,   for M/s.Anna Mathew

I Justice Abdul Quddhose opined that the petitioner should have taken up the matter with the Administrative Tribunal dealing with service matters and not approach the High Court in the first instance. No Government servant...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
GLIMPSE OF A LATEST VERDICT* *Minor V.Amrutha Vs. Council for Archietecture & Anr.* W.P.No.16762 of 2017 Dated: 07.09.2022 *Honourable Mr. Justice R. Subramanian * allowed the Writ Petition and awarded compensation and costs in the matter relating to *“NATA – Education – ”* and further observed and held as follows:

Uncategorized

 by · Published September 11, 2022

GLIMPSE OF A LATEST VERDICT* *Minor V.Amrutha Vs. Council for Archietecture & Anr.* W.P.No.16762 of 2017 Dated: 07.09.2022 *Honourable Mr. Justice R. Subramanian * allowed the Writ Petition and awarded compensation and costs in the matter relating to *“NATA – Education – ”* and further observed and held as follows:

[9/10, 07:27] Sekarreporter1: https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/2022/09/10/judge-r-subramaniyam-order-view-of-the-above-while-condemning-the-second-respondent-for-its-outrageous-and-inexplicable-conduct-i-direct-the-second-respondent-to-pay-a-compensation-of-rs-1000000/ [9/11, 07:18] Sekarreporter1: *GLIMPSE OF A LATEST VERDICT* *Minor V.Amrutha Vs. Council for Archietecture & Anr.* W.P.No.16762 of 2017 Dated: 07.09.2022 *Honourable Mr. Justice R. Subramanian * allowed the Writ...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version