SEKAR REPORTER Blog

W.M.P.No.27221 of 2022          Learned Public Prosecutor Mr.Hasan Mohamed Jinnah, would  submit that after this order 18.07.2022, there are           in                             W.P.No.18455 of 2022  SATHISH KUMAR, J.  This application is filed to modify certain directions issued by this Court while dealing with the W.P.No.18455 of 2022. In Para 5, this Court considering the sensitiveness involved in that particular case directed that whenever any such unnatural death is reported in educational institutions, in respect of any student, investigation has to be conducted by the CBCID.    Similarly the direction to the Education Department to conduct enquiry also to operate in all the cases with regard to the deaths occurring in educational institutions.  With the above discussions, the order dated 18.07.2022 is

W.M.P.No.27221 of 2022         Learned Public Prosecutor Mr.Hasan Mohamed Jinnah, would submit that after this order 18.07.2022, there are           in                            W.P.No.18455 of 2022 SATHISH KUMAR, J. This application is filed to modify certain directions issued by this Court while dealing with the W.P.No.18455 of 2022. In Para 5, this Court considering the sensitiveness involved in that particular case directed that whenever any such unnatural death is reported in educational institutions, in respect of any student, investigation has to be conducted by the CBCID. Similarly the direction to the Education Department to conduct enquiry also to operate in all the cases with regard to the deaths occurring in educational institutions. With the above discussions, the order dated 18.07.2022 is

                           W.M.P.No.27221 of 2022                     in                            W.P.No.18455 of 2022 SATHISH KUMAR, J. This application is filed to modify certain directions issued by this Court while dealing with the W.P.No.18455 of 2022. In Para...

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR  W.P.No.17399 of 2022 and WMP.No.16706 of 2022  M.Madhumitha  D/o.Medasamy Seenivasalu           ..Petitioner  Vs.    For Petitioner  	  : Mr.L.Chandrakumar     For Respondents  	  : Ms.V.Sudha,  Central Government Counsel[R1]  Mrs.D.Nagasaila  Standing Counsel [R2]  ORDER  Before parting, this Court express its anguish as to the way in which the examination was conducted with full of mess as discussed herein above and also direct the second respondent to avoid these kind of confusions in the future years examination so that the meritorious students may not be deprived of their right to get the chance of admission in the second respondent Institute.  With these observations and directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.  12.10.2022

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR W.P.No.17399 of 2022 and WMP.No.16706 of 2022 M.Madhumitha D/o.Medasamy Seenivasalu           ..Petitioner Vs. For Petitioner : Mr.L.Chandrakumar For Respondents : Ms.V.Sudha, Central Government Counsel[R1] Mrs.D.Nagasaila Standing Counsel [R2] ORDER Before parting, this Court express its anguish as to the way in which the examination was conducted with full of mess as discussed herein above and also direct the second respondent to avoid these kind of confusions in the future years examination so that the meritorious students may not be deprived of their right to get the chance of admission in the second respondent Institute. With these observations and directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 12.10.2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :12.10.2022 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR W.P.No.17399 of 2022 and WMP.No.16706 of 2022 M.Madhumitha D/o.Medasamy Seenivasalu           ..Petitioner Vs. University Grants Commission (UGC), Represented...

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J. NISHA BANU  and  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH     Crl.A.(MD)No.174 of 2020     Balamurugan           … Appellant / sole accused.      In the considered view of this Court, we come to a categoric conclusion that the prosecution has proved the case beyond reasonable doubts with abundant evidence and there is absolutely no ground to interfere with the well considered order and judgment passed by the Court below.     25. In the result,                      (i) This criminal appeal stands dismissed.                      (ii) The conviction and sentence passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Mahalir Neethimandram, Madurai, Madurai District, in Spl.S.C.No.44 of 2018 dated 26.09.2019, is hereby confirmed.                                                                                [J.N.B, J.]  &   [N.A.V., J.]                  17.10.2022      For Appellant     :  Mr.B.N.Raja Mohamed                                                               For Respondent  :  Mr.R.Meenakshi Sundaram                                                         Additional Public Prosecutor                                 JUDGMENT

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J. NISHA BANU and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH Crl.A.(MD)No.174 of 2020   Balamurugan           … Appellant / sole accused. In the considered view of this Court, we come to a categoric conclusion that the prosecution has proved the case beyond reasonable doubts with abundant evidence and there is absolutely no ground to interfere with the well considered order and judgment passed by the Court below. 25. In the result,                     (i) This criminal appeal stands dismissed.                     (ii) The conviction and sentence passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Mahalir Neethimandram, Madurai, Madurai District, in Spl.S.C.No.44 of 2018 dated 26.09.2019, is hereby confirmed.                                                                            [J.N.B, J.]  &   [N.A.V., J.]                  17.10.2022 For Appellant     :  Mr.B.N.Raja Mohamed                                                             For Respondent  :  Mr.R.Meenakshi Sundaram                                                        Additional Public Prosecutor                               JUDGMENT

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT       DATED : 17.10.2022   CORAM :   THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J. NISHA BANU and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH   Crl.A.(MD)No.174 of 2020...

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR  Review Application No.131 of 2022  in W.P.No.2128 of 2022     P.J.Punitha        Review Petitioner.  For Petitioner          :    Mr.G.Sankaran                                  For Respondents      : Mr.S.Silambanan                                                      Additional Advocate General                                                              assisted by                                          Mr.T.Chezhiyan,                                                    Additional Government Pleader                                                    for R1 to R5                                             Mr.T.L.Thirumalaisamy,                                                     Central Govt. Standing Counsel for R6                                                  Mrs.N.Kavitha Rameshwar,                                                              Amicus Curiae     ORDER

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR Review Application No.131 of 2022 in W.P.No.2128 of 2022 P.J.Punitha        Review Petitioner. For Petitioner          :    Mr.G.Sankaran                              For Respondents      : Mr.S.Silambanan                                                     Additional Advocate General                                                             assisted by                                         Mr.T.Chezhiyan,                                                   Additional Government Pleader                                                   for R1 to R5                                         Mr.T.L.Thirumalaisamy,                                                    Central Govt. Standing Counsel for R6                                              Mrs.N.Kavitha Rameshwar,                                                             Amicus Curiae ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON : 26.08.2022 DELIVERED ON : 19.10.2022  CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR Review Application No.131 of 2022 in W.P.No.2128 of 2022   P.J.Punitha                                         ...

பூந்தமல்லி வெடிகுண்டு வழக்கு சிறப்பு நீதிமன்றத்தில் Q Branch வழக்கில் 15.10.22 இன்று 16.50 மணிக்கு, தமிழர் விடுதலை படையை சேர்ந்த இருவர் குற்றவாளி என தீர்ப்பு. தண்டனை விவரம் 18.00 மணிக்கு மேல் அறிவிக்கப்படும்

பூந்தமல்லி வெடிகுண்டு வழக்கு சிறப்பு நீதிமன்றத்தில் Q Branch வழக்கில் 15.10.22 இன்று 16.50 மணிக்கு, தமிழர் விடுதலை படையை சேர்ந்த இருவர் குற்றவாளி என தீர்ப்பு. தண்டனை விவரம் 18.00 மணிக்கு மேல் அறிவிக்கப்படும்

*பூந்தமல்லி வெடிகுண்டு வழக்கு சிறப்பு நீதிமன்றத்தில் Q Branch வழக்கில் 15.10.22 இன்று 16.50 மணிக்கு, தமிழர் விடுதலை படையை சேர்ந்த இருவர் குற்றவாளி என தீர்ப்பு. தண்டனை விவரம் 18.00 மணிக்கு மேல் அறிவிக்கப்படும். Chennai City Q Branch CID Cr.No:741/2019 u/s 120...

PEARLS OF WISDOM (LATEST JUDGEMENT)*  The *Hon’ble Justice R. Suresh Kumar* allowed W.P. No. 24797 of 2022 filed by VSB Educational Trust and directed UGC to independently consider and pass orders on the application of the Petitioner College for autonomous status and observed as follows:-

PEARLS OF WISDOM (LATEST JUDGEMENT)* The *Hon’ble Justice R. Suresh Kumar* allowed W.P. No. 24797 of 2022 filed by VSB Educational Trust and directed UGC to independently consider and pass orders on the application of the Petitioner College for autonomous status and observed as follows:-

*PEARLS OF WISDOM (LATEST JUDGEMENT)* The *Hon’ble Justice R. Suresh Kumar* allowed W.P. No. 24797 of 2022 filed by VSB Educational Trust and directed UGC to independently consider and pass orders on the application...

GLIMPSE OF A LATEST VERDICT*  *Minor I Shafrin Fathima Vs. The Government of India Rep. by it Secretary & 4 Ors.* W.P. No. 26129 of 2022 Dated: 17.10.2022  *Honourable Mr. Justice R. Suresh Kumar* allowed of the Writ Petition in the matter relating to *“NEET – Change of Category – General (UR) to OBC”,* directing the DGHS to change the community from UR to OBC, communicate the same to the Petitioner, within two weeks, and further observed and held as follows:

GLIMPSE OF A LATEST VERDICT* *Minor I Shafrin Fathima Vs. The Government of India Rep. by it Secretary & 4 Ors.* W.P. No. 26129 of 2022 Dated: 17.10.2022 *Honourable Mr. Justice R. Suresh Kumar* allowed of the Writ Petition in the matter relating to *“NEET – Change of Category – General (UR) to OBC”,* directing the DGHS to change the community from UR to OBC, communicate the same to the Petitioner, within two weeks, and further observed and held as follows:

*GLIMPSE OF A LATEST VERDICT* *Minor I Shafrin Fathima Vs. The Government of India Rep. by it Secretary & 4 Ors.* W.P. No. 26129 of 2022 Dated: 17.10.2022 *Honourable Mr. Justice R. Suresh Kumar*...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com