SEKAR REPORTER Blog

In view of the above and for the reasons stated above, the present appeals succeed. The impugned judgment(s) and order(s) passed by the Division Bench of the High Court as well as that of the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition and refusing to issue the writ of quo warranto declaring the appointment of respondent No. 1 as Vice Chancellor of the APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University, Thiruvananthapuram as bad in law and/or illegal and void ab initio are hereby quashed and set aside. The writ petition is allowed. There shall be a writ of quo warranto declaring the appointment of the respondent No. 1 as Vice Chancellor of the APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University, Thiruvananthapuram as void ab initio and consequently, the appointment of respondent No. 1 as Vice Chancellor of the  APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University, Thiruvananthapuram is quashed and set aside.   Present appeals are accordingly allowed. No costs. 

In view of the above and for the reasons stated above, the present appeals succeed. The impugned judgment(s) and order(s) passed by the Division Bench of the High Court as well as that of the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition and refusing to issue the writ of quo warranto declaring the appointment of respondent No. 1 as Vice Chancellor of the APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University, Thiruvananthapuram as bad in law and/or illegal and void ab initio are hereby quashed and set aside. The writ petition is allowed. There shall be a writ of quo warranto declaring the appointment of the respondent No. 1 as Vice Chancellor of the APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University, Thiruvananthapuram as void ab initio and consequently, the appointment of respondent No. 1 as Vice Chancellor of the APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University, Thiruvananthapuram is quashed and set aside.  Present appeals are accordingly allowed. No costs. 

2   In view of the above and for the reasons stated above, the present appeals succeed. The impugned judgment(s) and order(s) passed by the Division Bench of the High Court as well as...

Constitutional Czars  in the Hall of Fame     Constitutional Czars  in the Hall of Fame  (Musings, Anecdotes & Episodes)        N Vijayaraghavan  V Lakshminarayanan Advocates, Madras High Court     Special Contributions:  Justice P N Prakash  Justice  G R Swaminathan  Justice N Anand Venkatesh

Constitutional Czars in the Hall of Fame Constitutional Czars in the Hall of Fame (Musings, Anecdotes & Episodes) N Vijayaraghavan V Lakshminarayanan Advocates, Madras High Court Special Contributions: Justice P N Prakash Justice  G R Swaminathan Justice N Anand Venkatesh

  Constitutional Czars in the Hall of Fame   Constitutional Czars in the Hall of Fame (Musings, Anecdotes & Episodes)     N Vijayaraghavan V Lakshminarayanan Advocates, Madras High Court   Special Contributions: Justice...

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN  C.R.P.(NPD).No.574 of 2005  Arulmighu Dhandayuthapani Thirukoil Palani,  Rep. by its Joint Commissioner/Executive Officer.  … Petitioner.    For Petitioner           : Mr.M.Sriram                                   For Respondents       : No appearance  O R D E R   20.In fine, this Civil Revision Petition is allowed and the fair & decreetal order dated 10.08.2004 made in E.A.No.37 of 2002 in E.P.No.258 of 1999 in OP.No.4 of 1994 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Udumalpet is hereby set aside and accordingly, Petition in E.A.No.37 of 2002 in E.P.No.258 of 1999 in OP.No.4 of 1994 filed by the Temple/Petitioner is hereby stands allowed.  No costs.

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN C.R.P.(NPD).No.574 of 2005 Arulmighu Dhandayuthapani Thirukoil Palani, Rep. by its Joint Commissioner/Executive Officer. … Petitioner. For Petitioner           : Mr.M.Sriram                                  For Respondents       : No appearance O R D E R 20.In fine, this Civil Revision Petition is allowed and the fair & decreetal order dated 10.08.2004 made in E.A.No.37 of 2002 in E.P.No.258 of 1999 in OP.No.4 of 1994 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Udumalpet is hereby set aside and accordingly, Petition in E.A.No.37 of 2002 in E.P.No.258 of 1999 in OP.No.4 of 1994 filed by the Temple/Petitioner is hereby stands allowed.  No costs.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on 23.09.2022 Pronounced on 12.10.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN C.R.P.(NPD).No.574 of 2005 Arulmighu Dhandayuthapani Thirukoil Palani, Rep. by its Joint Commissioner/Executive Officer....

Cigarette Smoking- Sorry- Selling Used Motor Vehicles Can Be Dangerous to your Health?                  Narasimhan Vijayaraghavan                                                        Preamble

Cigarette Smoking- Sorry- Selling Used Motor Vehicles Can Be Dangerous to your Health?                 Narasimhan Vijayaraghavan                                               Preamble

Cigarette Smoking- Sorry- Selling Used Motor Vehicles Can Be Dangerous to your Health? Narasimhan Vijayaraghavan         Preamble   For those active in the stock market,the automobile scrips are top of the...

CRL. O.P. NO. 34166 OF 2019 M.DHANDAPANI, J.   Though this Court could wield its judicial power to curb the menace and maintain the social decorum and harmony in the society.  However, it is the duty of the law enforcing agencies to be more vigilant and go to the rescue of the affected persons, rather than putting it on the head of the Court to interfere in each and every single instance.  Only with that view in mind this Court had constituted the Special Cells and, therefore, the operation of the Special Cells at the earliest is of utmost importance. List the matter for filing of comprehensive report by the 2nd respondent and also for the report of the Electronics Corporation of India with regard to the opening of tender on 02.11.2022.

CRL. O.P. NO. 34166 OF 2019 M.DHANDAPANI, J. Though this Court could wield its judicial power to curb the menace and maintain the social decorum and harmony in the society.  However, it is the duty of the law enforcing agencies to be more vigilant and go to the rescue of the affected persons, rather than putting it on the head of the Court to interfere in each and every single instance.  Only with that view in mind this Court had constituted the Special Cells and, therefore, the operation of the Special Cells at the earliest is of utmost importance. List the matter for filing of comprehensive report by the 2nd respondent and also for the report of the Electronics Corporation of India with regard to the opening of tender on 02.11.2022.

CRL. O.P. NO. 34166 OF 2019 M.DHANDAPANI, J. A decade and a half ago, it was only the print media which would take the good and bad information to the general public and many...

Neet case THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR  Writ Petition No.28135 of 2022 and W.M.P.No.27423 of 2022.    For Petitioner            :   Mr.K.Selvaraj  For Respondents :  Ms.P.J.Anitha, Central Government     Standing Counsel – for R1 to R3      Ms.Shubharanjani Ananth      Standing Counsel – for R4  In that view of the matter, this Court is inclined to dispose of this writ  petition with the following order.  That there shall be a direction to the respondents, especially respondents 2 and 3 to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 07.09.2022 in the light of the discussion herein above made and accordingly after changing the community of the petitioner from ‘General’ to ‘OBC’, communicate the

Neet case THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR Writ Petition No.28135 of 2022 and W.M.P.No.27423 of 2022. For Petitioner            :   Mr.K.Selvaraj For Respondents :  Ms.P.J.Anitha, Central Government     Standing Counsel – for R1 to R3     Ms.Shubharanjani Ananth     Standing Counsel – for R4 In that view of the matter, this Court is inclined to dispose of this writ petition with the following order. That there shall be a direction to the respondents, especially respondents 2 and 3 to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 07.09.2022 in the light of the discussion herein above made and accordingly after changing the community of the petitioner from ‘General’ to ‘OBC’, communicate the

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :    20.10.2022 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR Writ Petition No.28135 of 2022 and W.M.P.No.27423 of 2022 A.Ida Evangeline D/o T.Augstian Dhiraviya Raj No.9/60,...

The Honourable  Mr. Justice P.N.PRAKASH and  The Honourable Mr. Justice RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN  Criminal Appeal No.999 of 2022  Asif Musthaheen ….. Appellant.   For Appellant           : Mr.S.Veeraraghavan                                  For Respondent        : Mr.R.Muniyapparaj,  Addl. Public Prosecutor  JUDGEMENT.    In the light of the above legal position and in the facts and circumstances of the case, we find no merits in the appeal and the same is liable only to be dismissed.  In the result, this Criminal Appeal is dismissed and the order dated  24.08.2022 passed by the Sessions Court (Special Court for UAP Act cases), Erode District is confirmed.  [P.N.P., J.]     [T.K.R., J.]

The Honourable  Mr. Justice P.N.PRAKASH and The Honourable Mr. Justice RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN Criminal Appeal No.999 of 2022 Asif Musthaheen ….. Appellant. For Appellant           : Mr.S.Veeraraghavan                                 For Respondent        : Mr.R.Muniyapparaj, Addl. Public Prosecutor JUDGEMENT. In the light of the above legal position and in the facts and circumstances of the case, we find no merits in the appeal and the same is liable only to be dismissed. In the result, this Criminal Appeal is dismissed and the order dated 24.08.2022 passed by the Sessions Court (Special Court for UAP Act cases), Erode District is confirmed. [P.N.P., J.]     [T.K.R., J.]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Jugement   Reserved    on    : 10..10..2022 Judgement Pronounced on :  20..10..2022 Coram The Honourable  Mr. Justice P.N.PRAKASH and The Honourable Mr. Justice RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN Criminal Appeal No.999...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com