SEKAR REPORTER Blog

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN  (MD)Nos.18115, 18116, 18117 and  20397 of 2021 & 13398 of 2022 and  W.M.P.(MD)Nos.14960, 14962, 14964 & 17046 of 2021  i) W.P.(MD)No.18115 of 2021.     For Petitioner : Mr.V.Raghavachari,   for Mr.M.Karthikeyan.  For Respondents: Mr.R.Baskaran,    Additional Advocate General,      assisted by,    Mr.M.Sarangan,    Additional Government Pleader.       * * *          order quasjed                 

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN (MD)Nos.18115, 18116, 18117 and 20397 of 2021 & 13398 of 2022 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.14960, 14962, 14964 & 17046 of 2021 i) W.P.(MD)No.18115 of 2021. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Raghavachari,   for Mr.M.Karthikeyan. For Respondents: Mr.R.Baskaran,   Additional Advocate General,      assisted by,   Mr.M.Sarangan,   Additional Government Pleader.      * * *          order quasjed                 

  BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.07.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN (MD)Nos.18115, 18116, 18117 and 20397 of 2021 & 13398 of 2022 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.14960, 14962, 14964 & 17046 of...

W.M.P(MD)No.18242 of 2022 and  W.M.P(MD)No.18507 of 2022 in  W.P(MD)No.24134 of 2022   V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN  , J.  The petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking for a writ of  mandamus directing the respondents to permit the operation of the joint account  AIADMK & Pasumpon Thevar Ninaivalayam bearing account No.

W.M.P(MD)No.18242 of 2022 and W.M.P(MD)No.18507 of 2022 in W.P(MD)No.24134 of 2022  V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN  , J. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to permit the operation of the joint account AIADMK & Pasumpon Thevar Ninaivalayam bearing account No.

W.M.P(MD)No.18242 of 2022 and W.M.P(MD)No.18507 of 2022 in W.P(MD)No.24134 of 2022  V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN  , J. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to permit...

The Superintendent of Police, Tiruvannamalai District is called upon to  secure the present of Mr.Veer Pratap Singh, I.A.S., and physically produce him before this Court on the next date of hearing, i.e., on 15.11.2022.  Post this matter on 15.11.2022.  17.10.2022  hvk  Note: Registry is directed to issue a copy of this order to the            Superintendent of Police, Tiruvannamalai District, by 27.10.2022   M.S.RAMESH,J.  hvk  Contempt Petition No.1567 of 2022 and Sub Application (OS) No.555 of 2022  17.10.2022

The Superintendent of Police, Tiruvannamalai District is called upon to secure the present of Mr.Veer Pratap Singh, I.A.S., and physically produce him before this Court on the next date of hearing, i.e., on 15.11.2022. Post this matter on 15.11.2022. 17.10.2022 hvk Note: Registry is directed to issue a copy of this order to the           Superintendent of Police, Tiruvannamalai District, by 27.10.2022 M.S.RAMESH,J. hvk Contempt Petition No.1567 of 2022 and Sub Application (OS) No.555 of 2022 17.10.2022

Contempt Petition No.1567 of 2022 and Sub Application (OS) No.555 of 2022 M.S.RAMESH,J. For non-compliance of the order of the Writ Court, a statutory notice came to be issued on 12.09.2022, directing the respondent...

O.A.No.651 of 2022 in C.S (Comm.Div.) No.205 of 2022  M.SUNDAR.J  In this order, the parties to the captioned application shall be referred to by their respective ranks in the main suit for the sake of convenience and clarity.       [10/26, 14:39] Sekarreporter 1: The Madras High Court temporarily restrained digital payment app MobilePe and its group companies from offering Unified Payments Interface (UPI) and Bharat Interface for Money (BHIM) services following a trademark infringement suit filed by PhonePe.  In an interim order passed on October 19, Justice M Sundar held that the logos of the two apps were similar, and that a prima facie case of “possible deception” had been made out. [10/26, 14:39] Sekarreporter 1: ..

O.A.No.651 of 2022 in C.S (Comm.Div.) No.205 of 2022 M.SUNDAR.J In this order, the parties to the captioned application shall be referred to by their respective ranks in the main suit for the sake of convenience and clarity.   [10/26, 14:39] Sekarreporter 1: The Madras High Court temporarily restrained digital payment app MobilePe and its group companies from offering Unified Payments Interface (UPI) and Bharat Interface for Money (BHIM) services following a trademark infringement suit filed by PhonePe. In an interim order passed on October 19, Justice M Sundar held that the logos of the two apps were similar, and that a prima facie case of “possible deception” had been made out. [10/26, 14:39] Sekarreporter 1: ..

  [10/26, 14:39] Sekarreporter 1: The Madras High Court temporarily restrained digital payment app MobilePe and its group companies from offering Unified Payments Interface (UPI) and Bharat Interface for Money (BHIM) services following a...

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR  W.P.Nos.17895 & 19587 of 2022  and WMP.Nos.17235 &18884 of 2022    tet case order.    For Petitioners       W.P.No.17895 of 2022                  : Mr.B.Balavijayan                                                                Mr.V.Sivalingam       W.P.No.19587 of 2022                  : Mrs.Nalini Chidambaram,                                                                 Senior Counsel for                                                                  Mrs.C.Uma            For Respondents:                              : Mr.S.Silambanan,                                                                  Additional Advocate General                                                                                  assisted by                                                                Mr.T.Chezhiyan,                                                                 Additional Government Pleader                                                                       Mrs.Kavitha Rameshwar                                                               Amicus Curiae     COMMON ORDER

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR W.P.Nos.17895 & 19587 of 2022 and WMP.Nos.17235 &18884 of 2022   tet case order. For Petitioners      W.P.No.17895 of 2022                  : Mr.B.Balavijayan                                                               Mr.V.Sivalingam      W.P.No.19587 of 2022                  : Mrs.Nalini Chidambaram,                                                                Senior Counsel for                                                                 Mrs.C.Uma           For Respondents:                              : Mr.S.Silambanan,                                                                 Additional Advocate General                                                                                 assisted by                                                               Mr.T.Chezhiyan,                                                                Additional Government Pleader                                                                      Mrs.Kavitha Rameshwar                                                              Amicus Curiae COMMON ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON W.P.No.19587 of 2022 : 05.08.2022 W.P.No.17895 of 2022 : 29.08.2022 DELIVERED ON:20.10.2022 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR W.P.Nos.17895 & 19587 of 2022 and...

N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT  BOMBAY  CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION  FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 45 OF 2006  Nalini Nagnath Uphalkar  Age : 50 years, Occu. Household,  Residing at : S.No.63, Kedari  	        Nagar, Wanowadi, Pune-411040 V/s.  Nagnath Mahadev Uphalkar,

N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT  BOMBAY  CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 45 OF 2006 Nalini Nagnath Uphalkar Age : 50 years, Occu. Household, Residing at : S.No.63, Kedari Nagar, Wanowadi, Pune-411040 V/s. Nagnath Mahadev Uphalkar,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT  BOMBAY  CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 45 OF 2006 Nalini Nagnath Uphalkar Age : 50 years, Occu. Household, Residing at : S.No.63, Kedari   Nagar,...

சத்தியமங்கலம் புலிகள் சரணாலயத்தில் அமைந்துள்ள கோவில் திருவிழாவை முறைப்படுத்துவதற்கான நடவடிக்கைகள் எடுக்கப்பட்டுள்ளதாக தமிழக அரசு, சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றத்தில் விளக்கமளித்துள்ளது.

சத்தியமங்கலம் புலிகள் சரணாலயத்தில் அமைந்துள்ள கோவில் திருவிழாவை முறைப்படுத்துவதற்கான நடவடிக்கைகள் எடுக்கப்பட்டுள்ளதாக தமிழக அரசு, சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றத்தில் விளக்கமளித்துள்ளது.

சத்தியமங்கலம் புலிகள் சரணாலயத்தில் அமைந்துள்ள கோவில் திருவிழாவை முறைப்படுத்துவதற்கான நடவடிக்கைகள் எடுக்கப்பட்டுள்ளதாக தமிழக அரசு, சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றத்தில் விளக்கமளித்துள்ளது.¤ ஈரோடு மாவட்டத்தில் உள்ள சத்தியமங்கலம் புலிகள் சரணாலயத்துக்குள் அமைந்துள்ள ஆதிகருவண்ணராயர் பொம்மதேவர் கோவிலில், ஆண்டுதோறும் மாசி மாதம் பவுர்ணமி நாளில் திருவிழா நடத்தப்படுவதுண்டு. இந்த திருவிழாவுக்கு...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com