SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN S.A.No.821 of 2021 and CMP.No.15880 of 2021 Suresh Kumar   … Appellant ..vs.. Sivagami Sundar Rajan Hemalatha Vanitha … Respondents. For Appellant                           :     Mr.S.Kingston Jerold                                  For Respondents                           : Mr.A.Prabhakaran     JUDGMENT this Court confirms the judgment and decree of first Appellate Court in A.S.No.7 of 2019 dated 09.11.2020 confirming the judgment and decree of trial Court in O.S.No.233 of 2010 dated 27.10.2017 and dismisses the Second Appeal with the costs of the respondents throughout. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Uncategorized

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN S.A.No.821 of 2021 and CMP.No.15880 of 2021 Suresh Kumar   … Appellant ..vs.. Sivagami Sundar Rajan Hemalatha Vanitha … Respondents. For Appellant                           :     Mr.S.Kingston Jerold                                  For Respondents                           : Mr.A.Prabhakaran     JUDGMENT this Court confirms the judgment and decree of first Appellate Court in A.S.No.7 of 2019 dated 09.11.2020 confirming the judgment and decree of trial Court in O.S.No.233 of 2010 dated 27.10.2017 and dismisses the Second Appeal with the costs of the respondents throughout. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Judgment Reserved on 20.12.2021 Judgment Pronounced on 01.02.2022 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN S.A.No.821 of 2021 and CMP.No.15880 of 2021 Suresh Kumar   … Appellant ..vs.....

In fine, this Court sets aside the judgment and decree of the first Appellate Judge/II Additional District Judge, Chidambaram, in A.S.No.10 of 2015 dated 03.09.2018 and restores the judgment and decree of trial Judge/Subordinate Judge, Chidambaram. in O.S.No.27 of 2008 dated 06.01.2015 in decreeing the suit in favour of appellants and allows the Second Appeal with the costs of appellants throughout. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, is closed. Mra    31.01.2022         Internet: Yes Index   : Yes Speaking/Non speaking order To The II Additional District Judge, Chidambaram. The Subordinate Judge, Chidambaram. G.CHANDRASEKHARAN, J., mra Judgment in S.A.No.733 of 2019    31.01.2022

Uncategorized

In fine, this Court sets aside the judgment and decree of the first Appellate Judge/II Additional District Judge, Chidambaram, in A.S.No.10 of 2015 dated 03.09.2018 and restores the judgment and decree of trial Judge/Subordinate Judge, Chidambaram. in O.S.No.27 of 2008 dated 06.01.2015 in decreeing the suit in favour of appellants and allows the Second Appeal with the costs of appellants throughout. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, is closed. Mra    31.01.2022         Internet: Yes Index   : Yes Speaking/Non speaking order To The II Additional District Judge, Chidambaram. The Subordinate Judge, Chidambaram. G.CHANDRASEKHARAN, J., mra Judgment in S.A.No.733 of 2019    31.01.2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Judgment Reserved on 07.12.2021 Judgment Pronounced on 31.01.2022 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN S.A.No.733 of 2019 Ragina Beevi Sajithabegum Atham Ameer Ali Hakkim Meera …...

Madras high court 10 orders nov 12

Uncategorized

Madras high court 10 orders nov 12

[11/12, 15:12] Sekarreporter 1: தேசிய மனித உரிமை ஆணையத்தின் பரிந்துரைகளை ஏற்றுக்கொள்ள முடியாது என மாநில அரசு மறுக்க முடியாது சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் தெரிவித்துள்ளது. வழக்கறிஞர் எஸ் கே சாமி என்பவர் சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றத்தில் தொடர்ந்திருந்த வழக்கில் கடந்த 2008 ஆம் ஆண்டு சென்னை சட்டக்...

The Chief Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu being the sole respondent is required to take a call on the compliance with the orders of the 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and K.KUMARESH BABU, J. National Human Rights Commission, in the light of the observations of the Hon’ble Full Bench in Abdul Sathar Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and report by 15.11.2022. Post on 15.11.2022

Uncategorized

The Chief Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu being the sole respondent is required to take a call on the compliance with the orders of the 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and K.KUMARESH BABU, J. National Human Rights Commission, in the light of the observations of the Hon’ble Full Bench in Abdul Sathar Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and report by 15.11.2022. Post on 15.11.2022

  W.P.No.32041 of 2014 R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and K.KUMARESH BABU, J. The prayer in the Writ Petition reads as follows:- “directing the respondent to pay compensation of Rs.15,000/- as awarded by the National Human Rights...

Before we part with this case, we are compelled to observe that this Court is not at all happy with the functioning of the Authorities who are engaged in verification of these certificates.  The State Level Scrutiny Committee takes its own sweet time, in some cases, more than 20 years to complete the enquiry. Even if the State Level Scrutiny Committee completes the enquiry process, the Authorities in the directorate of Tribal Welfare take up another cause and issue directions at their whims and fancies.  It is high time that the Principal Secretary to Government, Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare looks into the issue seriously and sensitise its officers regarding their powers and responsibilities in the process of verification of the certificates.  We hope the needful will be done at the level of the Secretary.  (R.S.M.,J.)         (K.B.,J. For Petitioner            : Mr.S.Doraisamy                                  For Respondents       : Mr.R.S.Anandan ******** )

Uncategorized

Before we part with this case, we are compelled to observe that this Court is not at all happy with the functioning of the Authorities who are engaged in verification of these certificates.  The State Level Scrutiny Committee takes its own sweet time, in some cases, more than 20 years to complete the enquiry. Even if the State Level Scrutiny Committee completes the enquiry process, the Authorities in the directorate of Tribal Welfare take up another cause and issue directions at their whims and fancies.  It is high time that the Principal Secretary to Government, Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare looks into the issue seriously and sensitise its officers regarding their powers and responsibilities in the process of verification of the certificates.  We hope the needful will be done at the level of the Secretary.  (R.S.M.,J.)         (K.B.,J. For Petitioner            : Mr.S.Doraisamy                                  For Respondents       : Mr.R.S.Anandan ******** )

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02.11.2022 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU W.P.No.25232 of 2022 K.Lalitha Kumari          …Petitioner Vs. 1.The Senior Divisional Manager, Life Insurance...

are answered.  In view of this finding, the judgment and decree of the first appellate Judge/Subordinate Judge, Kancheepuram, in A.S.No.14 of 2013, dated 31.08.2018 is set aside and the judgment and decree of the trial Judge/District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Sriperumbudur in O.S.No.1062 of 2008, dated 21.12.2012 is restored. This Second Appeal is allowed.  No costs.  Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. Mra    08.04.2022 Internet: Yes Index   : Yes Speaking/Non speaking order To The Subordinate Judge, Kancheepuram. The District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Sriperumbudur. G.CHANDRASEKHARAN, J., mra Judgment in S.A.No.302 of 2019 and CMP Nos .4541 of 2019 and  17832 of 2021    08.04.2022. For Appellants                           :         Mr.P.Dinesh Kumar for    M/s.M.Nandhakumar                                  For Respondent                           : Mr.R.Subramanian JUDGMENT

Uncategorized

are answered.  In view of this finding, the judgment and decree of the first appellate Judge/Subordinate Judge, Kancheepuram, in A.S.No.14 of 2013, dated 31.08.2018 is set aside and the judgment and decree of the trial Judge/District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Sriperumbudur in O.S.No.1062 of 2008, dated 21.12.2012 is restored. This Second Appeal is allowed.  No costs.  Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. Mra    08.04.2022 Internet: Yes Index   : Yes Speaking/Non speaking order To The Subordinate Judge, Kancheepuram. The District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Sriperumbudur. G.CHANDRASEKHARAN, J., mra Judgment in S.A.No.302 of 2019 and CMP Nos .4541 of 2019 and  17832 of 2021    08.04.2022. For Appellants                           :         Mr.P.Dinesh Kumar for    M/s.M.Nandhakumar                                  For Respondent                           : Mr.R.Subramanian JUDGMENT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Judgment Reserved on 24.01.2022 Judgment Pronounced on 08.04.2022 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN S.A.No.302 of 2019 and CMP Nos .4541 of 2019 and  17832 of...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com