SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH H.C.P(MD)Nos.1710 & 1206 of  2022  and Crl.M.P(MD)No.12692 of 2022 HCP(MD)No.1710 of 2022:

Uncategorized

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH H.C.P(MD)Nos.1710 & 1206 of  2022  and Crl.M.P(MD)No.12692 of 2022 HCP(MD)No.1710 of 2022:

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Reserved on       :  07.11.2022 Pronounced on :   14.11.2022 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH H.C.P(MD)Nos.1710 & 1206 of  2022 ...

the status of the investigation in the Crime No.1418 of 2017 is restored to 20.12.2018. Consequently the committal of P.R.C.No.77 of 2018 to the Court of Sessions, the additional final report and charges framed pursuant to taking cognizance of the case on committal is hereby quashed. The further investigation shall continue by CBCID, Chennai. The Director General of Police, CBCID is directed to entrust the investigation by an officer in the rank of Inspector or above to investigate and file additional/supplementary final report. THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Crl.R.C.No.890 of 2021 and Crl.O.P.Nos.4942 & 7499 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.Nos.2892, 2893 /2019, 280/2020, 4279, 4280 & 12448 of 2021 Crl.R.C.No.890 of 2021 Dr.P.Thomas     .. Petitioner . For Petitioner in Crl.R.C &           : Mr.C.Manishankhar, Sr.C. for Crl.O.P.No.4942/2019                                             Mr.Ashwinkumar For petitioner in Crl.O.P         No.7499/2019                           : Mr.K.M.Subramanian                                  For Respondent in Crl.R.C.              : Mr.N.S.Suganthan For R1 in Crl.O.P.No.4942/2019     Govt.Advocate (Crl.Side) For R1& R2 in Crl.O.P.7499/2019                                  

Uncategorized

the status of the investigation in the Crime No.1418 of 2017 is restored to 20.12.2018. Consequently the committal of P.R.C.No.77 of 2018 to the Court of Sessions, the additional final report and charges framed pursuant to taking cognizance of the case on committal is hereby quashed. The further investigation shall continue by CBCID, Chennai. The Director General of Police, CBCID is directed to entrust the investigation by an officer in the rank of Inspector or above to investigate and file additional/supplementary final report. THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Crl.R.C.No.890 of 2021 and Crl.O.P.Nos.4942 & 7499 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.Nos.2892, 2893 /2019, 280/2020, 4279, 4280 & 12448 of 2021 Crl.R.C.No.890 of 2021 Dr.P.Thomas     .. Petitioner . For Petitioner in Crl.R.C &           : Mr.C.Manishankhar, Sr.C. for Crl.O.P.No.4942/2019                                             Mr.Ashwinkumar For petitioner in Crl.O.P         No.7499/2019                           : Mr.K.M.Subramanian                                  For Respondent in Crl.R.C.              : Mr.N.S.Suganthan For R1 in Crl.O.P.No.4942/2019     Govt.Advocate (Crl.Side) For R1& R2 in Crl.O.P.7499/2019                                  

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on    : 03.11.2022 Pronounced on    : 11.11.2022 Coram: THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Crl.R.C.No.890 of 2021 and Crl.O.P.Nos.4942 & 7499 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.Nos.2892, 2893...

Dr.Thomas moved the Highcourt to get releif and the case got stayed by the Highcourt. *Yesterday 3.11.2022* the final hearing for Quash came up before Honourable *Justice Dr. Jayachandran* , as item No.22 in the court hall 42.*(Crl.RC 890/2021,Crl.Op 4942/2019 & other 7 cases) Senior Counsul Mr.Manishankar argued* well for Dr. Thomas. After hearing the arguments the Justice reserved the orders.

Uncategorized

Dr.Thomas moved the Highcourt to get releif and the case got stayed by the Highcourt. *Yesterday 3.11.2022* the final hearing for Quash came up before Honourable *Justice Dr. Jayachandran* , as item No.22 in the court hall 42.*(Crl.RC 890/2021,Crl.Op 4942/2019 & other 7 cases) Senior Counsul Mr.Manishankar argued* well for Dr. Thomas. After hearing the arguments the Justice reserved the orders.

[11/14, 12:20] Sekarreporter 1: *Dr.P.Thomas* is an scientist in Embryology and being in the fertility profession for more than a decade, and he a running a hospital in the name and style of CFC...

The Madras High Court has held that the nexus between Income of detenue and the acquisition of property must be established under the Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976 (SAFEM). The Competent Authority under the Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976, challenged the order setting aside the proceedings of the appellant forfeiting the properties of the first

Uncategorized

The Madras High Court has held that the nexus between Income of detenue and the acquisition of property must be established under the Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976 (SAFEM). The Competent Authority under the Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976, challenged the order setting aside the proceedings of the appellant forfeiting the properties of the first

 The Madras High Court has held that the nexus between Income of detenue and the acquisition of property must be established under the Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976 (SAFEM)....

Ganeshprabhu Adv Madurai: The demand notice has been sent after the mandatory time period of thirty days as prescribed u/s.138 (b) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, while so, the cognizance of the impugned complaint is illegal and bad in law.

Uncategorized

Ganeshprabhu Adv Madurai: The demand notice has been sent after the mandatory time period of thirty days as prescribed u/s.138 (b) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, while so, the cognizance of the impugned complaint is illegal and bad in law.

[11/13, 12:43] Ganeshprabhu Adv Madurai: The demand notice has been sent after the mandatory time period of thirty days as prescribed u/s.138 (b) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, while so, the cognizance of...

THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.OP(MD)No.14336 of 2019 and Crl.MP(MD)No.8654 of 2019 M.P.Srinivasan                 : Petitioner/Accused Vs. K.Baskaran                     : Respondent/Complainant. For Petitioner        : Mr.s.Vanchinathan      For Respondent        : Mr.S.A.Ajmal Khan O R D E R 138 case. 13.In the result, this criminal original petition is allowed. The impugned proceedings in STC No.29 of 2017 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate (Fast Track Court Level), Theni is quashed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.                                                    12.09.2022

Uncategorized

THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.OP(MD)No.14336 of 2019 and Crl.MP(MD)No.8654 of 2019 M.P.Srinivasan                 : Petitioner/Accused Vs. K.Baskaran                     : Respondent/Complainant. For Petitioner        : Mr.s.Vanchinathan      For Respondent        : Mr.S.A.Ajmal Khan O R D E R 138 case. 13.In the result, this criminal original petition is allowed. The impugned proceedings in STC No.29 of 2017 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate (Fast Track Court Level), Theni is quashed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.                                                    12.09.2022

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Reserved on   : 07/04/2022 Pronounced on : 12/09/2022 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.OP(MD)No.14336 of 2019 and Crl.MP(MD)No.8654 of 2019 M.P.Srinivasan                 : Petitioner/Accused Vs. K.Baskaran                    ...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com