SEKAR REPORTER Blog

The Writ Petition filed by Karthik Gopinath seeking for a direction in relation to the amounts lying under the campaign initiated through the crowdfunding platform came up for hearing in the Hon’ble Madras High Court before Hon’ble Justice PD Audikesavalu.

The Writ Petition filed by Karthik Gopinath seeking for a direction in relation to the amounts lying under the campaign initiated through the crowdfunding platform came up for hearing in the Hon’ble Madras High Court before Hon’ble Justice PD Audikesavalu.

The Writ Petition filed by Karthik Gopinath seeking for a direction in relation to the amounts lying under the campaign initiated through the crowdfunding platform came up for hearing in the Hon’ble Madras High...

Madras high court orders nov 18

Madras high court orders nov 18

[11/18, 10:58] Sekarreporter 1: தவறான சிகிச்சையால் கால்பந்து வீராங்கனை ப்ரியா மரணமடைந்த வழக்கில், இரு மருத்துவர்கள் முன்ஜாமீன் கோரி சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றத்தில் மனுத்தாக்கல் செய்துள்ளனர். கால் முட்டியில் ஏற்பட்ட ஜவ்வு கிழிவு காரணமாக சென்னை வியாசர்பாடியை சேர்ந்த கல்லூரி மாணவியும், கால்பந்து வீராங்கனையுமான ப்ரியா,...

Domestic violence act full.bench order of.   Madras high court.  THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.N. PRAKASH  THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RMT. TEEKAA RAMAN  AND  THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA  Crl.O.P. SR. Nos.31852, 28394, 29208, 29745, 32249, 32612, 32966, 33350,

Domestic violence act full.bench order of. Madras high court. THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.N. PRAKASH THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RMT. TEEKAA RAMAN AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P. SR. Nos.31852, 28394, 29208, 29745, 32249, 32612, 32966, 33350,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON : 15.10.2022 DELIVERED ON :   17.11.2022 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.N. PRAKASH THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RMT. TEEKAA RAMAN AND THE HON’BLE...

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM     W.P.No.32592 of 2016     M.Muthu            …  Petitioner.    For Petitioner               : Dr.R.Gowri                                                                For M/s.R.Meenakshi                         For Respondents           : Mr.A.Murugan                                                                Central Government Standing    Counsel   The 1st respondent shall ensure that the Government of India orders are effectively implemented and actions are initiated against the Higher Officials, who all are practising the colonial system of orderly in their Battalion by using the constables/combatant/other employee for their personal works either at their residence or elsewhere.     With the above said directions, the writ petition stands allowed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM   W.P.No.32592 of 2016   M.Muthu            …  Petitioner. For Petitioner               : Dr.R.Gowri                                                               For M/s.R.Meenakshi                     For Respondents           : Mr.A.Murugan                                                               Central Government Standing   Counsel The 1st respondent shall ensure that the Government of India orders are effectively implemented and actions are initiated against the Higher Officials, who all are practising the colonial system of orderly in their Battalion by using the constables/combatant/other employee for their personal works either at their residence or elsewhere. With the above said directions, the writ petition stands allowed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS   DATED  :   18.11.2022   CORAM   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM   W.P.No.32592 of 2016   M.Muthu                                                                           …  Petitioner   Vs....

Vinothpandian: 2021 (2) CTC 261 : bharat petroleum corporation ltd vs P umapathy : order 2 rule 2CPC 1908 intended to prevent multiplicity of proceedings , not throw out genuine litigant at threshold

Vinothpandian: 2021 (2) CTC 261 : bharat petroleum corporation ltd vs P umapathy : order 2 rule 2CPC 1908 intended to prevent multiplicity of proceedings , not throw out genuine litigant at threshold

Sekarreporter[11/14, 07:28] Vinothpandian: 2021 (2) CTC 261 : bharat petroleum corporation ltd vs P umapathy : order 2 rule 2CPC 1908 intended to prevent multiplicity of proceedings , not throw out genuine litigant at...

THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY  A.S.No.608 of 2011  Muthusamy.   For Appellants  	  : Mr.T.Murugamanickam, Senior Counsel,    for Mr.C.S.Saravanan.     For Respondents  	  : Mr.A.K.Kumarasamy, Senior Counsel,     for Mr.S.Kaithamalai Kumaran.(for R3-R6)  : Steps Taken (for R1 & R2)  JUDGMENT  A.The Appeal Suit:-    Upon execution of the sale deed in favour of the plaintiffs either by the defendants or by Court, the defendants will be entitled for payment out of the entire balance sale consideration of Rs.15,02,100/- deposited by the plaintiffs along with accrued interest and the Trial Court shall pay the same, to the defendants without insisting for any formal application, only upon verification of the identity of the defendants; iii) The plaintiffs are entitled for costs throughout.  .11.2022  Index:Yes/No

THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.608 of 2011 Muthusamy. For Appellants : Mr.T.Murugamanickam, Senior Counsel,    for Mr.C.S.Saravanan. For Respondents : Mr.A.K.Kumarasamy, Senior Counsel,     for Mr.S.Kaithamalai Kumaran.(for R3-R6) : Steps Taken (for R1 & R2) JUDGMENT A.The Appeal Suit:-  Upon execution of the sale deed in favour of the plaintiffs either by the defendants or by Court, the defendants will be entitled for payment out of the entire balance sale consideration of Rs.15,02,100/- deposited by the plaintiffs along with accrued interest and the Trial Court shall pay the same, to the defendants without insisting for any formal application, only upon verification of the identity of the defendants; iii) The plaintiffs are entitled for costs throughout. .11.2022 Index:Yes/No

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Judgment Reserved on :  31.10.2022 Judgment Delivered on :     .11.2022 CORAM THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.608 of 2011 Muthusamy Karuppusamy Rangasamy Purushothaman Veerakumarasamy Balusamy...

Hon’ble Minister for Electricity, Prohibition & Excise Thiru V. Senthil Balaji has filed a suit for defamation & injunction against Mr. CTR Nirmal Kumar, State Secretary of BJP IT Wing, TN.  Today the suit came up for admission before Hon’ble Mr. Justice C.V. Karthikeyan of the Madras High Court.

Hon’ble Minister for Electricity, Prohibition & Excise Thiru V. Senthil Balaji has filed a suit for defamation & injunction against Mr. CTR Nirmal Kumar, State Secretary of BJP IT Wing, TN. Today the suit came up for admission before Hon’ble Mr. Justice C.V. Karthikeyan of the Madras High Court.

  Hon’ble Minister for Electricity, Prohibition & Excise Thiru V. Senthil Balaji has filed a suit for defamation & injunction against Mr. CTR Nirmal Kumar, State Secretary of BJP IT Wing, TN. Today the...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com