You may also like...
-
GLIMPSE OF A LATEST VERDICT* *HOLIDAY IS A LUXURY AND THE GST DEPARTMENT DOES NOT RECOGNISE THE CONCEPTS OF “WORKING DAY” AND “HOLIDAY”* -Dr. Justice Anita Sumanth The *Hon’ble Justice Dr. Anita Sumanth* has allowed W.P. No. 22646 of 2022 in D.K. Enterprises vs. Assistant/Deputy Commissioner (ST) Adjudication, Intelligence, Chennai and directed the respondents to release the life saving drug namely polystardone XL-IO on the ground that the Department has not passed the order of detention within seven days of detention or seizure under proviso to sub-section 1 of section 129 of the CGST Act, 1997 and no show cause notice issued under section 129(3) of the CGST Act, 1997 and held as follows:
by Sekar Reporter · Published December 25, 2022
-
Ms. Sheela countered the argument by stating that the initiating authority was not a fact finding authority to allow cross-examination. She said the adjudicating authority would grant that opportunity to the appellants. She also told the court that the appellants had already been served with copies of all documents, which the initiating authority had relied upon to invoke the 1988 Act and attach their immovable properties.
by Sekar Reporter · Published April 21, 2022
-
Vinothpandian: 2000 (8) SCC 740 : Basavaraj R patil vs state of karnataka : provisions of sec 313 of CRPC are not meant to nail the accused to his disadvantage but are meant for his benefit [11/20, 10:22] Vinothpandian: 1969 CRI LJ 654 : Bibhuti bhusan das gupta vs state
by Sekar Reporter · Published November 23, 2021