Follow:
- Next story [1/18, 11:32] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1351046826280022018?s=08 [1/18, 11:33] Sekarreporter1: Mhc cj santheep banerji welcome function in madurai hc live video https://t.co/jLbUI5j6v2 https://t.co/qg9Cvkw1QI
- Previous story [1/18, 11:08] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1351041067181871104?s=08 [1/18, 11:09] Sekarreporter1: நீதித்துறையை களங்கம் ஏற்படுத்தும் வகையில் பேசிய ஆடிட்டர் குருமூர்த்தி மீது உரிய நடவடிக்கை மேற்கொள்ள வேண்டும் என வழக்கறிஞர் சார்லஸ் அலெக்சாண்டர் நீதிபதிகள் கிருபாகரன் மற்றும் நீதிபதி ஆதிகேசவலு அமர்வு முன்பு முறையீடு செய்தார் இந்த முறையீட்டை ஏற்றுக் கொண்ட நீதிபதிகள் மனுவாக தாக்கல் செய்யுமாறு அறிவுறுத்தி உள்ளனர்
Recent Posts
- appellant leased out acquired lands for developing Industrial Park for a period of 99 years for a lease amount of Rs.1/- p.a. and therefore, Clause 39 of the lease agreement would squarely apply for recovering sub-leasing charges. Further, SIPCOT is empowered to impose conditions and
- Mother-Father Temple Street) has been rightly rejected by the learned Single Judge, as no mandamus can be issued to the State authorities in exercise of powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India directing the street to be given a particular name.
- Naming of a street is certainly not liable to be interfered with the exercise of the powers under Article 226. 6. As the petitioner has no legal righ
- referred to the Vigilance Cell of the Madras High Court. Hence, this Court is not inclined to hear this case. It is appropriate that the matter is placed before the Hon’ble Chief Justice for posting before an appropriate Bench
- cycling rally was flagged off in the presence of Hon’ble Mr. Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy of the Madras High Court,
More
Recent Posts
- appellant leased out acquired lands for developing Industrial Park for a period of 99 years for a lease amount of Rs.1/- p.a. and therefore, Clause 39 of the lease agreement would squarely apply for recovering sub-leasing charges. Further, SIPCOT is empowered to impose conditions and
- Mother-Father Temple Street) has been rightly rejected by the learned Single Judge, as no mandamus can be issued to the State authorities in exercise of powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India directing the street to be given a particular name.
- Naming of a street is certainly not liable to be interfered with the exercise of the powers under Article 226. 6. As the petitioner has no legal righ
- referred to the Vigilance Cell of the Madras High Court. Hence, this Court is not inclined to hear this case. It is appropriate that the matter is placed before the Hon’ble Chief Justice for posting before an appropriate Bench
- cycling rally was flagged off in the presence of Hon’ble Mr. Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy of the Madras High Court,