Mhc Advts CAA discussion

[12/29, 18:05] Sekarreporter 1: [12/29, 18:03] Jeganathan Advt: Can Advocate Surya Prakash tell why he’s opposed to CAA and NRC and also against which provisions he is against in the new Amendment
[12/29, 18:05] Jeganathan Advt: I would love to know please 🙏🏻🙏🏻
[12/29, 18:05] Sekarreporter 1: [12/29, 18:03] Jeganathan Advt: Can Advocate Surya Prakash tell why he’s opposed to CAA and NRC and also against which provisions he is against in the new Amendment
[12/29, 18:05] Jeganathan Advt: I would love to know please 🙏🏻🙏🏻
[12/29, 18:44] Sekarreporter 1: [12/29, 18:26] Vasanthakumar Advt: Respected Senior Advocates & My dear friends.

In view of the series of protests against CAA, throughout our Nation, I ventured to understand the CAA, therefore, I read the CAA bill, Amendment Act as well as statement of objects & reasons.

I find no legal infirmity therein. According, to my understanding the rationale behind specifying Bangladesh, Pakistan & Afghanistan is that those Countries are declared Islamic Nations. Therefore, Muslims are majority in population, whereas Hindu, Christian, Sikh, Jain, Parsi are minorities who were subjected religious persecution are declared to be eligible for citizenship subject to the provisions of Foreigners Act & Passport Act.

I sincerely appeal that the opinion expressed herein is my personal as an member of the legal faternity 🙏
[12/29, 18:27] Sekarreporter 1: 👍
[12/29, 19:15] Sekarreporter 1: [12/29, 19:09] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: You really want to know patty!read yesterday’s centrre page article by Chief justice APShah.you will know.i will just now send you.shed your prejudice &read the scholarly article!
[12/29, 19:15] Sekarreporter 1: 👍
[12/29, 19:34] Sekarreporter 1: [12/29, 19:31] Jeganathan Advt: What is the grand design, you may well ask. On the face of it, the implications of the CAA is to isolate individuals who identify as belonging to the Muslim community. If you restrict the understanding of the law, as the government would have it, to applying it only to immigrants, then this law automatically makes Muslim immigrants second class priorities when they are on Indian soil, even though they may have made the long trek to India for the same reasons (poverty, political persecution, etc.) that drove their Hindu or Christian neighbours out. If you expand the understanding of this law, as the government has overtly done (by linking the NRC to the CAA), it has implications of making all Muslims in India second class citizens. In doing so, this law and policy subverts and even destroys fundamental constitutional principles of secularism, fraternity, and humanity.
[12/29, 19:33] Jeganathan Advt: Hon’ble Justice Chandru can please enlighten all of us about this Para as written by AP Shah
[12/29, 19:33] Sekarreporter 1: 🌾
[12/29, 19:34] Sekarreporter 1: [12/29, 19:34] Sekarreporter 1: [12/29, 19:31] Jeganathan Advt: What is the grand design, you may well ask. On the face of it, the implications of the CAA is to isolate individuals who identify as belonging to the Muslim community. If you restrict the understanding of the law, as the government would have it, to applying it only to immigrants, then this law automatically makes Muslim immigrants second class priorities when they are on Indian soil, even though they may have made the long trek to India for the same reasons (poverty, political persecution, etc.) that drove their Hindu or Christian neighbours out. If you expand the understanding of this law, as the government has overtly done (by linking the NRC to the CAA), it has implications of making all Muslims in India second class citizens. In doing so, this law and policy subverts and even destroys fundamental constitutional principles of secularism, fraternity, and humanity.
[12/29, 19:33] Jeganathan Advt: Hon’ble Justice Chandru can please enlighten all of us about this Para as written by AP Shah
[12/29, 19:33] Sekarreporter 1: 🌾
[12/29, 19:34] Jeganathan Advt: How can Justice Chandru please not see this contradiction
[12/29, 19:38] Sekarreporter 1: [12/29, 19:36] Jeganathan Advt: The 1955 Act defines Illegal Immigrants and Section 4,5 of the Act is clear pertaining to Citizenship by Birth, Citizenship by Descendants (Descent) and that is remaining untouched- Where is the Harm for the Muslims here??
[12/29, 19:38] Jeganathan Advt: Only the Sections pertaining to Citizenship by Registration and the Naturalization process especially for Non Muslims from Islamic Fundamentalists States which share open Borders between us is dealt with- The Act has not touched Sections pertaining to Citizenship by Birth and Descents
[12/29, 19:39] Sekarreporter 1: [12/29, 19:38] Jeganathan Advt: 🙏🏻
[12/29, 19:39] Jeganathan Advt: Illegal Immigrants is Defined in Section 2(1) clearly and there alone an exception is there for the Religious Persecution of Non Muslims as Islam is a state religion
[12/29, 19:57] Sekarreporter 1: [12/29, 19:41] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: உள்ளங்கை புண்ணுக்கு கண்ணாடி வேண்டாம்!
[12/29, 19:56] Sekarreporter 1: 👍
[12/29, 20:16] Sekarreporter 1: [12/29, 20:16] Sekarreporter 1: [12/29, 20:08] Adv Suryaprakasam APS: a INA freedom fighter pension writ appeal filed by the central government against the single judge orderfreedom fighter widow Mrs. Lakshmi directing the government to sanction her came up before the first bench consisting of justice A.P.Shaw and justice Ibrahim kalifulla and the union government argued that the said Lakshmi who is a Tamilian and came to Chennai as repatriate and settled in Chennai wasborn in Burma and as such she cannot be considered as Indian citizen but the bench dismissed the writ appeal of the government and held that Lakshmi father was a citizen of crown ( then British empire) and as such children born to crown citizens are deemed to be Indian citizens and further directed the government to sanction her NIA pension immediately
[12/29, 20:10] Adv Suryaprakasam APS: Subsequently central government accepted that position and granted her family pension. I have appeared for Mrs. Lakshmi in that case
[12/29, 20:16] Adv Suryaprakasam APS: Union of India vs S.M .S. Lakshmi
[12/29, 21:08] Sekarreporter 1: [12/29, 20:55] Jeganathan Advt: What has that got to do with CAA Amendment and kindly tell me which provision of Present CAA are you against please be specific
[12/29, 20:56] Jeganathan Advt: Under the Present Government for the First Time Since Independence All NIA Bose Independence Freedom Fighters were allowed to take part in the Republic Day Parade – This happened last year which was denied by the Congress 🙏🏻🙏🏻
[12/29, 21:18] Sekarreporter 1: [12/29, 21:12] Jeganathan Advt: Under the New Amendment there is not a Single Word called Islam, Muslim etc…
how do you say it’s against Indian Muslims and Indian Muslims will lose citizenship please explain based on What provisions of the new CAA kindly enlighten sir 🙏🏻🙏🏻
[12/29, 21:18] Sekarreporter 1: 👍
[12/29, 21:18] Sekarreporter 1: [12/29, 21:12] Jeganathan Advt: Under the New Amendment there is not a Single Word called Islam, Muslim etc…
how do you say it’s against Indian Muslims and Indian Muslims will lose citizenship please explain based on What provisions of the new CAA kindly enlighten sir 🙏🏻🙏🏻
[12/29, 21:18] Sekarreporter 1: 👍

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Call Now ButtonCALL ME