Mhc advocate Vinothpandian today law tips

[12/26, 11:20] Vinothpandian: AIR 1955 SC 58 : navin chandra vs commr IT : widest possible construction must be put upon the words in construing an entry of legislative list . ( constitutional enactment )
[12/26, 11:20] Vinothpandian: 1992 (3) SCC 580 : Indian aluminium co vs karnataka electricity board : courts avoid any direct blame on constitution or the legislature but wish that the legislative competency should be of very high degree , constitution is considered as a base and interpretation should be more around it
[12/26, 11:20] Vinothpandian: AIR 1988 SC 686 : KI shepherd vs union of india : courts should not enter into constitutional issues and attempt interpretation of its provisions unless it is really necessary for disposal of the disputes
[12/26, 11:29] Vinothpandian: 1990 (2) SCC 378 : PK unni vs nirmala industries : court not entitled to add or alter any word and it would give effect to clear words of statute
[12/26, 11:29] Vinothpandian: AIR 2010 SC 3796 : Bhanumati vs state of uttar pradesh : It is duty of judge to act as an interpreter of social context articulated in legal text and cannot act like a photographic recorder
[12/26, 11:29] Vinothpandian: AIR 1968 SC 870 : Ishwarlal vs state of gujarat : dictionaries and reports of foreign cases held not safe guides , safe guide is the statute itself

You may also like...