Meta AI: The petitioner argued that the government order violates the HR&CE Act, which prohibits commercial exploitation of temple properties. They’re seeking to quash the order and have the cottages returned to temple trustees or fit persons.

[14/01, 09:08] Sekarreporter: “Stating that the GO is in violation of the HR&CE Act which prohibits commercial exploitation of temple properties, he requested the court to quash the order and retransfer the cottages to the respective temple trustees or fit persons.”
https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/tamil-nadu/2025/Dec/07/madras-hc-stays-go-giving-control-of-yatri-nivas-built-with-temple-funds-to-ttdc#:~:text=Stating%20that%20the%20GO%20is%20in%20violation%20of%20the%20HR%26CE%20Act%20which%20prohibits%20commercial%20exploitation%20of%20temple%20properties%2C%20he%20requested%20the%20court%20to%20quash%20the%20order%20and%20retransfer%20the%20cottages%20to%20the%20respective%20temple%20trustees%20or%20fit%20persons.
[14/01, 09:08] Meta AI: The petitioner argued that the government order violates the HR&CE Act, which prohibits commercial exploitation of temple properties. They’re seeking to quash the order and have the cottages returned to temple trustees or fit persons. Sounds like a complex issue, maybe try searching online for more context? 😊