Follow:
- Next story The Madras High Court on Friday directed the State government to spell out whether it had issued any guidelines on the use and disposal of face masks, since there were complaints of people using non-reusable masks repeatedly. Justices Vineet Kothari and R. Suresh Kumar directed State government pleader V. Jayaprakash Narayan to ensure that the response of the State government was filed within two weeks.
- Previous story Dmk case Puthiyathaimurai news full video www.Sekarreporter. Com
Recent Posts
- Government Can Engage Lawyers Of Its Choice; Cannot Be Compelled To Provide Reservation U/S 34 RPwD Act: Madras High Court https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/v-muthupandi-v-the-secretary-to-government-public-department-2026mhc3189-contract-as-litigants-choice-1619106 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme Court & Other Legal Updates:-* https://www.verdictum.in/social-media
- HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W. P.(MD)No.15422 of 2026and W.M.P.(MD)No.11560 of 2026 Laura Frances Iyengar Vs. 1.TN HR and CE Department, No.119, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Thousand Lights, Nungambakkam West, Chennai-34. 2.The Assistant Commissioner, HR and CE Department, Pattukottai Taluk, Thanjavur District. 3.Sri Arulmighu Abishta Varatharajaperumal Temple
- [03/08, 19:49] sekarreporter1: Today, during the hearing of a case related to NGT ban on construction on 1 km zone around Pallikaranai marshland before #MadrasHighCourt, Senior Counsel P.S. Raman argued for CREDAI Chennai and Senior Counsel J. Ravindran represented G-Square. After Mr. Raman argued at length, Senior Counsel J. Ravindran: I will adopt the arguments of Mr. Raman and also his professional fees MiLords [03/08, 19:49] sekarreporter1: 👍
- Bail granted /HON’BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD) No. 16216 of 2026 G.V.Markandayan S/o.Late.G.Varatharajan, Member of Legislative Assembly (Vilathikulam Constituency),
- TIRUPARANKUNDRAM DEEPAM CASE
More
Recent Posts
- Government Can Engage Lawyers Of Its Choice; Cannot Be Compelled To Provide Reservation U/S 34 RPwD Act: Madras High Court https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/v-muthupandi-v-the-secretary-to-government-public-department-2026mhc3189-contract-as-litigants-choice-1619106 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme Court & Other Legal Updates:-* https://www.verdictum.in/social-media
- HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W. P.(MD)No.15422 of 2026and W.M.P.(MD)No.11560 of 2026 Laura Frances Iyengar Vs. 1.TN HR and CE Department, No.119, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Thousand Lights, Nungambakkam West, Chennai-34. 2.The Assistant Commissioner, HR and CE Department, Pattukottai Taluk, Thanjavur District. 3.Sri Arulmighu Abishta Varatharajaperumal Temple
- [03/08, 19:49] sekarreporter1: Today, during the hearing of a case related to NGT ban on construction on 1 km zone around Pallikaranai marshland before #MadrasHighCourt, Senior Counsel P.S. Raman argued for CREDAI Chennai and Senior Counsel J. Ravindran represented G-Square. After Mr. Raman argued at length, Senior Counsel J. Ravindran: I will adopt the arguments of Mr. Raman and also his professional fees MiLords [03/08, 19:49] sekarreporter1: 👍
- Bail granted /HON’BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD) No. 16216 of 2026 G.V.Markandayan S/o.Late.G.Varatharajan, Member of Legislative Assembly (Vilathikulam Constituency),
- TIRUPARANKUNDRAM DEEPAM CASE