You may also like...
-
![[09/04, 17:52] sekarreporter1: https://www.sekarreporter.com/sri-krishna-sweets-trademark-dispute-between-brothers-m-krishnan-and-m-murali-justice-senthilkumar-ramamoorthy-of-madrashighcourt-refuses-to-summon-the-deputy-registrar-of-trademarks-to-tender-evi/ [09/04, 17:52] sekarreporter1: In the ongoing trademark dispute between brothers M. Krishnan and M. Murali (Sri Krishna Sweets) concerning the mark “KRISHNA,” the Madras High Court, presided over by Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, declined to summon the Deputy Registrar of Trademarks to tender evidence. Madhan Babu and K. V. Subha appeared as counsel for Mr. Murali, while Sridhar appeared on behalf of Sri Krishna Sweets Pvt. Ltd. The present application was filed by the Respondent in the rectification petition instituted by Murali against Sri Krishna Sweets Pvt. Ltd. The dispute centres on the nature of the trademark “KRISHNA,” specifically whether it constitutes a word mark or a device mark. The applicant had sought to summon the Deputy Registrar under Section 138 of the Trade Marks Act to clarify alleged discrepancies in the “legal use certificate” issued by the Registry. The Court held that no useful purpose would be served by summoning the Deputy Registrar and observed that the parties are at liberty to advance their respective arguments on the classification of the mark at the stage of final hearing. Matter posted to 29.04.26](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
[09/04, 17:52] sekarreporter1: https://www.sekarreporter.com/sri-krishna-sweets-trademark-dispute-between-brothers-m-krishnan-and-m-murali-justice-senthilkumar-ramamoorthy-of-madrashighcourt-refuses-to-summon-the-deputy-registrar-of-trademarks-to-tender-evi/ [09/04, 17:52] sekarreporter1: In the ongoing trademark dispute between brothers M. Krishnan and M. Murali (Sri Krishna Sweets) concerning the mark “KRISHNA,” the Madras High Court, presided over by Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, declined to summon the Deputy Registrar of Trademarks to tender evidence. Madhan Babu and K. V. Subha appeared as counsel for Mr. Murali, while Sridhar appeared on behalf of Sri Krishna Sweets Pvt. Ltd. The present application was filed by the Respondent in the rectification petition instituted by Murali against Sri Krishna Sweets Pvt. Ltd. The dispute centres on the nature of the trademark “KRISHNA,” specifically whether it constitutes a word mark or a device mark. The applicant had sought to summon the Deputy Registrar under Section 138 of the Trade Marks Act to clarify alleged discrepancies in the “legal use certificate” issued by the Registry. The Court held that no useful purpose would be served by summoning the Deputy Registrar and observed that the parties are at liberty to advance their respective arguments on the classification of the mark at the stage of final hearing. Matter posted to 29.04.26
by Sekar Reporter · Published April 9, 2026
-
-
: *His Lordship Hon’ble Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira* was pleased to pass orders of *interim bail* in respect of the following item numbers of the cause list dated 26.3.2020. Item Nos: *7,8,9,10,15,17,19,23,25,26,27, 28,32,33,34,35,36,39,40,41, 42,46,51.* In all these cases interim bail granted till 27.04.2020, and the respective jail authorities are directed to release the accused on bail on execution of own bond for Rs 10000/-. The above matters will be listed on 20.04.20 for further hearing. *Relaxation: item no: 53,54,55- Allowed.* *Item No: 58(Lower court granted bail with condition to deposit some amount. In that case also interim bail granted on own bond)* _Note: Pls confirm the above message by verifying the orders which will be available in Highcourt website probably by tomorrow._ [3/26, 20:09] Sekarreporter 1: ..
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 26, 2020