You may also like...
-
கணவரை விவாகரத்து செய்து, ஷரியத் கவுன்சிலில் முஸ்லிம் பெண் நீதிபதி சரவணன் ரத்து
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 31, 2023
-
Today mhc news
by Sekar Reporter · Published June 10, 2020
-
15.In the light of the legal proposition enunciated above, this court is of the opinion that the notices issued by the fourth respondent are not hit by limitation. Thus, there is no reason to interfere with the findings so rendered by the CESTAT. 16.In the result, both the writ petitions fail and they are dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (R.M.D., J.) (J.S.N.P.,J.) For Petitioner : Mr. J. Sivanandaraaj in both the Writ Petitions For Respondents : Mr. T. Pramod Kumar Chopda Senior Standing Counsel in both the Writ Petitions COMMON ORDER R. MAHADEVAN, J.
by Sekar Reporter · Published July 20, 2022