Madras high court quashes FIR against cartoonist Bala – http://toi.in/TNyQFa88/a31gj Use the TOI app to get Breaking news and headlines. Download now: https://timesofindia.onelink.me/efRt/ASmwebshare

You may also like...

• 

  Justice M. Nirmal Kumar of #MadrasHighCourt orders transfer from the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB) in Chengalpattu to the JJB in Chennai the trial in a case related to a 13-year-old girl having been subjected to aggravated sexual assault by a gang of 15 persons, including six juveniles, in 2024. The victim’s father had sought for the transfer since the family had shifted to Chennai since then and also on the ground that the JJB in Chengalpattu lacks child friendly infrastructure required for the deposition of the victim. The judge ordered the transfer of the trial against the adult offenders too from the special court for POCSO offences in Chengalpattu to the POCSO court in Chennai. @THChennai Backgrounder👇 thehindu.com/news/national/…

  June 24, 2026

   by Sekar Reporter · Published June 24, 2026

• 

  Supreme Court not superior to high courts, says Chief Justice BR Gavai Speaking at an event to celebrate the 79th Independence Day, the CJI said that both courts are equal.

  August 16, 2025

   by Sekar Reporter · Published August 16, 2025

• 

  Justice saravan directed the govt to appoint the petitioner to the post of app because of the erroneous adoption of reservation policy in the matter of appointment to the post of APP by the previous govt particularly in respect of horizontal reservation. Order: These petitions coming on this day for hearing upon perusing the petitions and the respective affidavits filed in support thereof MR.R.SINGARAVELAN, Advocate for the and SENIOR hearing the arguments MR.I.SADDAM HUSSAIN, and of upon ADVOCATE for petitioner in WP.NO.11714/2021, MR.R.SINGARAVELAN, Senior Counsel for I.SADDAM HUSSAIN Advocate for the Petitioner in WP.NO.1309/2021 and of GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE on behalf of the 1 MR.N.VAITHIYALINGAM, Standing Counsel MR.L.S.M.HASAN for FIZAL, Respondent, and of the 2 and 3rd Respondents, and of MR.K.SASINDRAN, Advocate for the 4 Respondent, the court made the following order:

  September 30, 2021

   by Sekar Reporter · Published September 30, 2021