You may also like...
-
Full Bench of the Madras High Court comprising Justice M M Sundresh, Justice Bharathidasan and Justice Anand Venkatesh, has in a seminal ruling ( by orders from.28/5/2020 made in Rajalingam vs Suganthalakshmi) of huge impact, held that appeals against acquittal of accused by Magistrate Courts, in private complaints vis a vis Negotiable Instrumenta Act,1881, ( christened as ‘cheque bouncing cases’) shall only be under Sec.378 (4) of Cr.PC and before High Court alone, with requisite leave under 378(5) and not under Proviso to Sec.372, as amended since 2009.
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 28, 2020
-
Mr.N.Venkataraman, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court of India Monday zoom meeting
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 10, 2020
-
Trsenthil Tax: The contention of the learned counsel for the Assessee is that the period of exclusion should be computed from the date on which the order under Section 142(2A) of the Act was served upon the Assessee viz., on 20.04.2000 till 31.07.2000 which will give the exclusion period of 102 days only and therefore, the Assessment Order passed on 13.11.2000 will be hit by the bar of limitation.
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 15, 2020