Madras High Court (Madurai bench) ruled that detention orders under the Goondas Act can’t be used for every murder case. Justices N Anand Venkatesh and P Dhanabal quashed the order against M Rajeshkumar—he was held ove

[22/03, 08:57] sekarreporter1: ”
OPEN APP
News
Videos
India
Elections 2026
World
City
TOI Games
Life & Style
Entertainment
Business
Tech
Cricket
Sports
TV
Web Series
Education
Speaking Tree
Voice Of Conscience
Success Story Of Visionary Leaders
TOI Newsletters
Health
Real Estate
Legal
Defence

Detention order cannot be resorted to in every murder case: HC
CITY
|
Kaushik Kannan | Mar 22, 2026, 02:52 IST

Comments
Share

Madurai: A detention order can never be a substitute to handle a situation which can be dealt with under the normal criminal law, Madras high court observed while quashing the detention order passed against a man over a murder case involving a money dispute in Trichy district.
The court was hearing a petition filed by the wife of M Rajeshkumar, who is detained at the Trichy Central Prison, seeking to quash the detention order passed under the Goondas Act by Thanjavur district collector against her husband. The petitioner stated that the order was passed based on a solitary case of murder.
The additional public prosecutor submitted that the manner in which the murder took place in broad daylight certainly warranted the passing of a detention order. Even in a solitary case, if the facts so warrant, a detention order can be passed, considering the fact that such activity will be prejudicial to the maintenance of public order and public peace.
A division bench of justice N Anand Venkatesh and justice P Dhanabal observed that even in a solitary case, a detention order can be passed if that solitary case by itself is of such a nature which will be prejudicial to the maintenance of public order and public peace. However, such a detention order cannot be resorted to in each and every case involving murder. There must be something more than the offence of murder committed to justify the passing of a detention order.
In the present case, there was a money dispute between the parties which led to the alleged commission of murder. This incident by itself did not warrant the passing of a detention order, since it could have been dealt with under the normal criminal law that is available. “For every case of murder, the authorities cannot resort to passing detention orders under Act 14 of 1982 (Goondas Act),” the judges observed and set aside the detention order passed against Rajeshkumar and ordered him to be released forthwith.
The judges observed that they were inclined to impose costs in the present case, since they found that a detention order was not warranted. However, the additional public prosecutor submitted that he will immediately address this issue to the govt and ensure that detention orders are not passed in a mechanical fashion in all cases involving a solitary incident and that the authorities will be careful while passing such orders in future. The judges directed that such instructions be issued immediately and observed that if the court finds any other case in future involving a solitary case which could be dealt with under the normal criminal law and where a detention order has been passed, it will be forced to interfere with the same and impose costs.Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with EId ul fitr 2026 wishes, messages and quotes !
Start a Conversation
Post Comment

Popular From City

‘Maharashtra Epstein Files’: Nashik astrologer rape case triggers political storm, questions raised on Rupali Chakankar

IMD issues thunderstorm alerts across India; heavy rain, hailstorms strong winds likely in multiple states

Catholic bishops demand ‘withdrawal or revision’ of Maharashtra’s new anti-conversion law

Botanical Garden will stay shut for 2 more years for revamp

Techie, mother die by suicide after groom cancels wedding over ‘secretly recorded’ videos
More News
Follow Us On Social Media

Get notifications on latest TOI news
End Of Article
Trending Stories

US-Israel-Iran War News Live Updates: Israel pounds Tehran as Iranians mark Nowruz; UAE, Kuwait defences respond to missile barrage

‘Wasn’t easy’: Anaya reveals father Sanjay Bangar’s role after gender-affirming surgery
Kick streamer Clavicular f
[22/03, 08:57] Meta AI: மதுரை உயர்நீதிமன்றம்: ஒவ்வொரு கொலைக்கும் Goondas Act-இல் தடுப்பு ஆணை விடக் கூடாது என்று தீர்ப்பு. ராஜேஷ்குமார் வழக்கில், பணப் பிரச்சினை கொலைக்கு சாதாரண குற்றச் சட்டம் போதுமானது; தடுப்பு ஆணை ரத்து, விடுதலை உத்தரவு.
[22/03, 08:58] sekarreporter1: [22/03, 08:57] sekarreporter1: ”
OPEN APP
News
Videos
India
Elections 2026
World
City
TOI Games
Life & Style
Entertainment
Business
Tech
Cricket
Sports
TV
Web Series
Education
Speaking Tree
Voice Of Conscience
Success Story Of Visionary Leaders
TOI Newsletters
Health
Real Estate
Legal
Defence

Detention order cannot be resorted to in every murder case: HC
CITY
|
Kaushik Kannan | Mar 22, 2026, 02:52 IST

Comments
Share

Madurai: A detention order can never be a substitute to handle a situation which can be dealt with under the normal criminal law, Madras high court observed while quashing the detention order passed against a man over a murder case involving a money dispute in Trichy district.
The court was hearing a petition filed by the wife of M Rajeshkumar, who is detained at the Trichy Central Prison, seeking to quash the detention order passed under the Goondas Act by Thanjavur district collector against her husband. The petitioner stated that the order was passed based on a solitary case of murder.
The additional public prosecutor submitted that the manner in which the murder took place in broad daylight certainly warranted the passing of a detention order. Even in a solitary case, if the facts so warrant, a detention order can be passed, considering the fact that such activity will be prejudicial to the maintenance of public order and public peace.
A division bench of justice N Anand Venkatesh and justice P Dhanabal observed that even in a solitary case, a detention order can be passed if that solitary case by itself is of such a nature which will be prejudicial to the maintenance of public order and public peace. However, such a detention order cannot be resorted to in each and every case involving murder. There must be something more than the offence of murder committed to justify the passing of a detention order.
In the present case, there was a money dispute between the parties which led to the alleged commission of murder. This incident by itself did not warrant the passing of a detention order, since it could have been dealt with under the normal criminal law that is available. “For every case of murder, the authorities cannot resort to passing detention orders under Act 14 of 1982 (Goondas Act),” the judges observed and set aside the detention order passed against Rajeshkumar and ordered him to be released forthwith.
The judges observed that they were inclined to impose costs in the present case, since they found that a detention order was not warranted. However, the additional public prosecutor submitted that he will immediately address this issue to the govt and ensure that detention orders are not passed in a mechanical fashion in all cases involving a solitary incident and that the authorities will be careful while passing such orders in future. The judges directed that such instructions be issued immediately and observed that if the court finds any other case in future involving a solitary case which could be dealt with under the normal criminal law and where a detention order has been passed, it will be forced to interfere with the same and impose costs.Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with EId ul fitr 2026 wishes, messages and quotes !
Start a Conversation
Post Comment

Popular From City

‘Maharashtra Epstein Files’: Nashik astrologer rape case triggers political storm, questions raised on Rupali Chakankar

IMD issues thunderstorm alerts across India; heavy rain, hailstorms strong winds likely in multiple states

Catholic bishops demand ‘withdrawal or revision’ of Maharashtra’s new anti-conversion law

Botanical Garden will stay shut for 2 more years for revamp

Techie, mother die by suicide after groom cancels wedding over ‘secretly recorded’ videos
More News
Follow Us On Social Media

Get notifications on latest TOI news
End Of Article
Trending Stories

US-Israel-Iran War News Live Updates: Israel pounds Tehran as Iranians mark Nowruz; UAE, Kuwait defences respond to missile barrage

‘Wasn’t easy’: Anaya reveals father Sanjay Bangar’s role after gender-affirming surgery
Kick streamer Clavicular f
[22/03, 08:58] sekarreporter1: English
[22/03, 08:58] Meta AI: Madras High Court (Madurai bench) ruled that detention orders under the Goondas Act can’t be used for every murder case. Justices N Anand Venkatesh and P Dhanabal quashed the order against M Rajeshkumar—he was held over a money-dispute murder. The court said normal criminal law is enough unless the act threatens public order, and warned authorities not to apply detention orders mechanically.