*Madras High Court* – *Judges:* Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice G. Arul Murugan – *Case:* K. Vasudevan vs State of Tamil Nadu – *Date of Order:* December 3, 2025 – *Counsel:* – Petitioner: Mr. K. Selvaraj – Respondent: Not specified – *Court Observation:* The court questioned the Tamil Nadu government on why bus stops are being constructed on national highways without permission. The court expressed concern that such unauthorized constructions can lead to traffic congestion and accidents. The judges directed the state government to take action to prevent such constructions and file a response in the matter. *Key Points:* – The petitioner, a councilor, filed a petition against the construction of a bus stop on a national highway in Ranipet district. – The court was informed that the construction was being carried out without permission, potentially misusing MLA funds. – The judges noted that such constructions can cause traffic congestion and lead to accidents. – The court directed the state government to take action and file a response.
*Madras High Court*
– *Judges:* Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice G. Arul Murugan
– *Case:* K. Vasudev
an vs State of Tamil Nadu
– *Date of Order:* December 3, 2025
– *Counsel:*
– Petitioner: Mr. K. Selvaraj
– Respondent: Not specified
– *Court Observation:*
The court questioned the Tamil Nadu government on why bus stops are being constructed on national highways without permission. The court expressed concern that such unauthorized constructions can lead to traffic congestion and accidents. The judges directed the state government to take action to prevent such constructions and file a response in the matter.
*Key Points:*
– The petitioner, a councilor, filed a petition against the construction of a bus stop on a national highway in Ranipet district.
– The court was informed that the construction was being carried out without permission, potentially misusing MLA funds.
– The judges noted that such constructions can cause traffic congestion and lead to accidents.
– The court directed the state government to take action and file a response.
