Madras High Court* – *Judge:* D Bharatha Chakravarthy – *Parties:* Lakshmanan (Petitioner/Convict) vs. The State (Respondent) – *Date of Order:* December 1, 2025 – *Counsel:* – For Petitioner: Not specified – For Respondent: Not specified – *Court Observation:* The court reduced the prison term of the convict from 3 years to 15 days, considering his circumstances, including his disability and family situation, and the fact that the survivor had moved on with her life. The court also noted the convict’s willingness to pay monetary compensation to the victim.

[02/12, 12:48] Meta AI: *Madras High Court*

– *Judge:* D Bharatha Chakravarthy
– *Parties:* Lakshmanan (Petitioner/Convict) vs. The State (Respondent)
– *Date of Order:* December 1, 2025
– *Counsel:*
– For Petitioner: Not specified
– For Respondent: Not specified
– *Court Observation:* The court reduced the prison term of the convict from 3 years to 15 days, considering his circumstances, including his disability and family situation, and the fact that the survivor had moved on with her life. The court also noted the convict’s willingness to pay monetary compensation to the victim.
[02/12, 12:49] Meta AI: The Madras High Court case involving Lakshmanan, who was convicted of sexual harassment, doesn’t specify the counsel names for both sides. However, the judge who passed the orders is Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy. He reduced Lakshmanan’s prison term from 3 years to 15 days, considering his circumstances, including his disability and family situation, and the victim’s willingness to move on with her life. ¹
[02/12, 12:49] Meta AI: The Madras High Court case involving Lakshmanan, who was convicted of sexual harassment, doesn’t specify the counsel names for both sides. The judge who passed the orders is Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy. He reduced Lakshmanan’s prison term from 3 years to 15 days, considering his circumstances, including his disability and family situation, and the victim’s willingness to move on with her life. ¹
[02/12, 12:50] Meta AI: *Madras High Court*

– *Judge:* D Bharatha Chakravarthy
– *Parties:* Lakshmanan (Petitioner/Convict) vs. The State (Respondent)
– *Date of Order:* December 1, 2025
– *Counsel:*
– For Petitioner: Not specified
– For Respondent: Not specified
– *Court Observation:* The court reduced the prison term of the convict from 3 years to 15 days, considering his circumstances, including his disability and family situation, and the fact that the survivor had moved on with her life. The court also noted the convict’s willingness to pay monetary compensation to the victim.
[02/12, 12:50] Meta AI: *Madras High Court*

– *Judge:* D Bharatha Chakravarthy
– *Parties:* Lakshmanan (Petitioner/Convict) vs. The State (Respondent)
– *Date of Order:* December 1, 2025
– *Counsel:*
– For Petitioner: Not specified
– For Respondent: Not specified
– *Court Observation:* The court reduced the prison term of the convict from 3 years to 15 days, considering his circumstances, including his disability and family situation, and the fact that the survivor had moved on with her life. The court also noted the convict’s willingness to pay monetary compensation to the victim.
[02/12, 12:50] Meta AI: *Madras High Court*

– *Judge:* D Bharatha Chakravarthy
– *Parties:* Lakshmanan (Petitioner/Convict) vs. The State (Respondent)
– *Date of Order:* December 1, 2025
– *Counsel:*
– For Petitioner: Not specified
– For Respondent: Not specified
– *Court Observation:* The court reduced the prison term of the convict from 3 years to 15 days, considering his circumstances, including his disability and family situation, and the fact that the survivor had moved on with her life. The court also noted the convict’s willingness to pay monetary compensation to the victim.