Follow:
- Next story Madras high court on Wednesday dismissed a PIL challenging the method adopted by Tangedco to calculate power consumption during lockdown. Tangedco calculated the consumption charges for the four months — March to June — based on the bill amount paid by each consumer for February. It was alleged that consumers can be billed only on the basis of the units consumed and not on the last payment made.
- Previous story [7/15, 11:11] Sekarreporter 1: [7/15, 11:11] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1283275377356320768?s=08 [7/15, 11:11] Sekarreporter 1: Madras HC dismisses case challenging the methodology adopted by Tangedco to calculate power charges during the lockdown period but says individual grievances can be worked out @THChennai [7/15, 11:14] Sekarreporter 1: For EB AAG Aravinth Pandian argued judge accepted AAG arguments
Recent Posts
- S m subramaniyam judge order /District Superintendent of Police. In the event of receiving any complaint regarding illegal mining operations, violation of the Act and the Rules, excess quarry etc., the Commissioner of Geology and Mines, the District Superintendent of Police and the District Collector, are bound to conduct a detailed investigation inquiry under the provisions of the Act and the Rules, and prosecute all persons apart from initiation of disciplinary actions against the officials, who all are responsible and accountable for illegal mining operations. The petitioner is at liberty to submit representations along with all necessary details to the officials. 18. With the above directions, the present writ petition stands disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. 15-04-2024Index : Yes/NoInternet: Yes/NoSpeaking order/Non-Speaking orderNeutral Citation : Yes/NoSvn
- Chief Justice Sanjay V. Gangapurwala and Justice J. Sathya Narayana Prasad on Thursday. Tirunelveli-based advocate S. Veilumuthu had filed the case accusing the CMDA PRO of having disseminated to the media an election related political news through his official e-mail address.
- Thiru.Dayanidhi Maran, (Male/Age 57 Yrs)S/o Late Thiru. Murasoli MaranNo.3, First Avenue,Boat Club Raja Annamalaipuram,Chennai-600028 …Complainant-Vs- Edapadi.palanisamy /complaint copy/
- today 9 law tips Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) DRTC 56 : naveed Ahmed vs koppa & another : An order being an authoritative direction , injunction or mandate , it is decision of a court or judge made or entered in writing , it should necessarily contain reasons ( Rule 12 ( 4) debt recovery tribunal ( procedure ) rules 1993
- வாக்காளர்களுக்கு எந்த வகையில் லஞ்சம் கொடுத்தாலும், அது அரசியலமைப்பு, ஜனநாயகத்தின் கட்டமைப்பை தகர்த்துவிடும் என உயர் நீதிமன்ற மதுரைக் கிளை judge pugalenthi எச்சரிக்கை/ mukesh reporter
More
Recent Posts
- S m subramaniyam judge order /District Superintendent of Police. In the event of receiving any complaint regarding illegal mining operations, violation of the Act and the Rules, excess quarry etc., the Commissioner of Geology and Mines, the District Superintendent of Police and the District Collector, are bound to conduct a detailed investigation inquiry under the provisions of the Act and the Rules, and prosecute all persons apart from initiation of disciplinary actions against the officials, who all are responsible and accountable for illegal mining operations. The petitioner is at liberty to submit representations along with all necessary details to the officials. 18. With the above directions, the present writ petition stands disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. 15-04-2024Index : Yes/NoInternet: Yes/NoSpeaking order/Non-Speaking orderNeutral Citation : Yes/NoSvn
- Chief Justice Sanjay V. Gangapurwala and Justice J. Sathya Narayana Prasad on Thursday. Tirunelveli-based advocate S. Veilumuthu had filed the case accusing the CMDA PRO of having disseminated to the media an election related political news through his official e-mail address.
- Thiru.Dayanidhi Maran, (Male/Age 57 Yrs)S/o Late Thiru. Murasoli MaranNo.3, First Avenue,Boat Club Raja Annamalaipuram,Chennai-600028 …Complainant-Vs- Edapadi.palanisamy /complaint copy/
- today 9 law tips Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) DRTC 56 : naveed Ahmed vs koppa & another : An order being an authoritative direction , injunction or mandate , it is decision of a court or judge made or entered in writing , it should necessarily contain reasons ( Rule 12 ( 4) debt recovery tribunal ( procedure ) rules 1993
- வாக்காளர்களுக்கு எந்த வகையில் லஞ்சம் கொடுத்தாலும், அது அரசியலமைப்பு, ஜனநாயகத்தின் கட்டமைப்பை தகர்த்துவிடும் என உயர் நீதிமன்ற மதுரைக் கிளை judge pugalenthi எச்சரிக்கை/ mukesh reporter