You may also like...
-
In the light of the above discussion, we do not find any illegality in the order passed by the second respondent and it does not warrant the interference of this Court and accordingly, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs. [N.A.V., J.] & [K.K.R.K., J.]
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 12, 2026
-
-
Sathyamangalam tiger case THE HON’BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.No.1830 of 2022 For Respondents : Mr.J.Ravindran, (for R1 & R2) (in W.P.No.1830 of 2022) Additional Advocate General, Assisted by Dr.T.Seenivasan, Special Govt. Pleader (Forest) : Mr.P.Muthukumar ( for R4 & R6) State Govt. Pleader, Assisted by Mr.S.J.Md. Sathik, Government Advocate
by Sekar Reporter · Published April 6, 2022