law of wills : Thiagarajan s vs chitkala govindasamy : will entirely handwritten dated and signed by testator but not signed by required witness ,type written will containing signature of attesting witness cannot be construed as holographic will ,mere non – mentioning of earlier will is not fatal

[29/09, 09:52] Vinothpandian: 2016(3) CTC 501 : law of wills : Thiagarajan s vs chitkala govindasamy : will entirely handwritten dated and signed by testator but not signed by required witness ,type written will containing signature of attesting witness cannot be construed as holographic will ,mere non – mentioning of earlier will is not fatal
[29/09, 09:52] Vinothpandian: 2019(3) CTC 391 : state rep by inspector of police ,CBI/ SCB chennai vs VP pandi : CRPC 1973 sec 362 : section 362 bars review of order already passed ,change of counsel would not give rise to new cause of action for court to review its earlier orders passed in criminal proceedings
[29/09, 09:52] Vinothpandian: 2019(5) CTC 522 : M Antonysamy vs S Mumtaj : legal services authorities act 1987 sec 21 : Held lok Adalat award obtained by fraud and collusion ,fraud vitiates all solemn acts ,award obtained by playing fraud is nullity and non – est in eyes of law ,award set aside by exercising power under article 227 of constitution