Follow:
- Next story V subramani Advt: Sekar….I want to share a proud moment…After Pandian sir ..his period of speakar office. First time..he was coming to high court as.. an Advocate…Myself and Rubu monohar were good friends .at that time….Rubu informed me abt this..and asked me to be wt him to receive
- Previous story https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/2021/01/03/watch-%e0%ae%9a%e0%af%86%e0%ae%a9%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%a9%e0%af%88-%e0%ae%89%e0%ae%af%e0%ae%b0%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%a8%e0%af%80%e0%ae%a4%e0%ae%bf%e0%ae%ae%e0%ae%a9%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%b1-%e0%ae%a4%e0%ae%b2%e0%af%88-2/
Recent Posts
- R Ganesan District Judge retired :- It is not uncommon in India that judicial officers from the lowest rank to the highest institution of CJI thinking themselves that the power vested to sit in an elevated positioning than that of a lwyer or a litigant is meant to disgrace or treat the advocates to offend them or use harsh or in dignified and inappropriate languages ot gesticulations . The elevated position to the judges in a court of law is to authorise them the
- 07:45] sekarreporter1: Advocate john sathyan is appointed as state public prosecutor by TVK. He was recomended by advocate general Vijay narayanan. A background of him.
- Ganesan Judge – Comments on Family Courts Act, 1984* _Sekar Reporter post – key legal points raised_ *1. Core arguments made by Judge Ganesan* *A. Publication ban – privacy protection* 1. _“The very mandate of the Family Court Act 1984 is that
- THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR OA Nos.455 & 456 of 2026 and A Nos.1036 & 2130 of 2026 and OA Nos.183 to 185 of 2024 in CS No. 54 of 2024 1. M.A.M.R. Muthiah Chettinad House, Rajah Annamalaipuram, Chennai 600 028. 2. Geetha Muthiah Chettinad House, Rajah Annamalaipuram, Chennai 600
- Justice N. Senthilkumar passes the order following a few applications filed by industrialist M.A.M.R. Muthiah, his wife Geetha Muthiah, and five others
More
Recent Posts
- R Ganesan District Judge retired :- It is not uncommon in India that judicial officers from the lowest rank to the highest institution of CJI thinking themselves that the power vested to sit in an elevated positioning than that of a lwyer or a litigant is meant to disgrace or treat the advocates to offend them or use harsh or in dignified and inappropriate languages ot gesticulations . The elevated position to the judges in a court of law is to authorise them the
- 07:45] sekarreporter1: Advocate john sathyan is appointed as state public prosecutor by TVK. He was recomended by advocate general Vijay narayanan. A background of him.
- Ganesan Judge – Comments on Family Courts Act, 1984* _Sekar Reporter post – key legal points raised_ *1. Core arguments made by Judge Ganesan* *A. Publication ban – privacy protection* 1. _“The very mandate of the Family Court Act 1984 is that
- THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR OA Nos.455 & 456 of 2026 and A Nos.1036 & 2130 of 2026 and OA Nos.183 to 185 of 2024 in CS No. 54 of 2024 1. M.A.M.R. Muthiah Chettinad House, Rajah Annamalaipuram, Chennai 600 028. 2. Geetha Muthiah Chettinad House, Rajah Annamalaipuram, Chennai 600
- Justice N. Senthilkumar passes the order following a few applications filed by industrialist M.A.M.R. Muthiah, his wife Geetha Muthiah, and five others