Kumarasamy Mhc Advt: I was there. At any point of time Sathisparasaran pleaded for stay. He argued Section 143 IPC has not been made out. Judge said to Government Advocate that legal question has been raised, file your counter. [11/26, 16:20] Sekarreporter 1:

[11/26, 16:14] Sekarreporter 1: [11/26, 16:05] Sekarreporter 1: Senior counsel Satish Parasaran appeared for the petitioner. S. Santhosh, Government Advocate appeared for the State. On hearing both sides, Hon’ble justice RN Manjula refused to stay the FIR since there are allegations and that the prosecution has collected materials to show that the petitioner had made several tweets to organise the crowd inside the temple. [11/26, 16:05] Sekarreporter 1: 👍👍 https://sekarreporter.com/11-26-1605-sekarreporter-1-senior-counsel-satish-parasaran-appeared-for-the-petitioner-s-santhosh-government-advocate-appeared-for-the-state-on-hearing-both-sides-honble-justice-rn/
[11/26, 16:20] Sekarreporter 1: [11/26, 16:20] Kumarasamy Mhc Advt: I was there. At any point of time Sathisparasaran pleaded for stay. He argued Section 143 IPC has not been made out. Judge said to Government Advocate that legal question has been raised, file your counter.
[11/26, 16:20] Sekarreporter 1: 👍