You may also like...
-
Lordship v parthiban j -6.This Court is unable to appreciate the conduct of the litigants by invoking the constitutional jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, without waiting for a reasonable time to lapse. This Court unfortunately has been witnessing in the recent past that plethora of ‘Mandamus’ Writ Petitions being filed at the drop of a hat for all kinds of relief as a matter of course taking away the precious time of this Court from focusing on a quality litigation in true exercise of its constitutional jurisdiction. The Writ Courts have been deluged with ‘Mandamus’ petitions converting the constitutional jurisdiction of this Court into a ‘Direction Factory’ or ‘Machine’ producing clichéd, stereotype order/hackneyed directions which hardly require any application of mind.
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 17, 2021
-
[2/12, 19:42] Sekarreporter1: #BREAKING||அண்ணா பல்கலை.யில் எம்.டெக். படிப்பில் 45 மாணவர்கள் சேர்க்கைக்கு அனுமதியளிக்க சாத்தியம் இல்லை *சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றத்தில் அகில இந்திய தொழில்நுட்ப கல்விக்கவுன்சில் பதில் *எம்.டெக். மாணவர் சேர்க்கைக்கான கட[2/12, 19:43] Sekarreporter1: Judge pugalenthi adj case next week saravanan advt petner aicte rabu
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 12, 2021
-
40 Senior advocates law officers பாராட்டு விழா mba chief guest advocate general shanmuga sundaram full video
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 22, 2023