You may also like...
-
Suo Motu W.P.No.29197 of 2015 S uo Motu W .P.No.29197 of 2015 THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE and SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J. This matter was listed today and we have perused the previous orders passed from time to time. We have been informed by the learned Additional Solicitor General of India and the learned Advocate General that a Public Interest Litigation in W.P.No.1635 of 2020 has been filed pertaining to common security arrangements being organised for the entire premises in and around the High Court. Let the said Public Interest Litigation be connected with this writ petition.full order in the link
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 31, 2020
-
![[2/23, 14:48] Vinothpandian: 2016(5) CTC 746 : Ayyasamy A vs A paramasivam : ” fraud is knowing misrepresentation of truth or concealment of material fact to induce another to act to his detriment [2/23, 14:48] Vinothpandian: 2014(4) CTC 315 : Rajagopalan vs Gnanapandithan : Held non _ issuance of reply or counter affidavit by itself is not ground for allowing applications [2/23, 14:48] Vinothpandian: 2016(4) CTC 92 : Axis bank vs SBS organics Pvt Ltd : SARFASi act 2002 sec 18 : Held pre – deposit made by borrower with tribunal would not empower bank to claim general lien ,banker cannot exercise right of general lien against pre – deposit amount deposited by borrower [2/23, 14:48] Vinothpandian: 2013(1)CTC 931 SC : deputy inspector general of police vs S.Samuthiram : service law : mere acquittal of employee by criminal court has no impact on disciplinary proceedings initiated by employer ,punishment of dismissal of service cannot be interfered [2/23, 14:48] Vinothpandian: AIR 2017 SC 1432 : Sasi vs Aravindakshan Nair : An application for review has to be disposed of as expeditiously as possible [2/23, 14:48] Vinothpandian: AIR 1982 MP 8 : jairam vs jagatram : ignorance of law if pleaded is no ground for condonation of delay](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
[2/23, 14:48] Vinothpandian: 2016(5) CTC 746 : Ayyasamy A vs A paramasivam : ” fraud is knowing misrepresentation of truth or concealment of material fact to induce another to act to his detriment [2/23, 14:48] Vinothpandian: 2014(4) CTC 315 : Rajagopalan vs Gnanapandithan : Held non _ issuance of reply or counter affidavit by itself is not ground for allowing applications [2/23, 14:48] Vinothpandian: 2016(4) CTC 92 : Axis bank vs SBS organics Pvt Ltd : SARFASi act 2002 sec 18 : Held pre – deposit made by borrower with tribunal would not empower bank to claim general lien ,banker cannot exercise right of general lien against pre – deposit amount deposited by borrower [2/23, 14:48] Vinothpandian: 2013(1)CTC 931 SC : deputy inspector general of police vs S.Samuthiram : service law : mere acquittal of employee by criminal court has no impact on disciplinary proceedings initiated by employer ,punishment of dismissal of service cannot be interfered [2/23, 14:48] Vinothpandian: AIR 2017 SC 1432 : Sasi vs Aravindakshan Nair : An application for review has to be disposed of as expeditiously as possible [2/23, 14:48] Vinothpandian: AIR 1982 MP 8 : jairam vs jagatram : ignorance of law if pleaded is no ground for condonation of delay
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 23, 2023
-
Section 81 of the Act, the Registrar/Competent Authority may order for an enquiry under Section 81 in respect of Co-operative Societies and any person, who is involved in such illegality or fraud etc., is liable to be prosecuted under Section 87 of the Act and if the allegations are travelling beyond the Primary Society and affecting the Financing Bank or functioning of the Central Co-operative Bank, t. Full order of. THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.(MD) No.24272 of 2019 and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.20879 of 2019 & 959 of 2020 A.C.Thirumurthy : Mr.M.Ajmal Khan Senior Counsel for M/s.Ajmal Associates For Respondent : Mr.P.Thilak Kumar, Additional Government Pleader assisted by Mr.M.Ramesh, Government Advocate
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 22, 2022
