![[3/4, 17:53] Sekarreporter 1: [3/4, 17:47] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: Very rarely an additional judge is transferred before becoming permanent!it is not the case of justice kannan who went to P&H hc.It looks as if he was originally to be appointed in Delhi HC.Since that might not have been possible he was appointed here only to be shifted by transfer mode!Madras Hc has become launching pad for many and it looks like a transit house!!It is a pity that the Bar never discusses such issues! [3/4, 17:51] Sekarreporter 1: [3/4, 18:01] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: In service law there are several methods of appointing a person to a post.They are direct recruitment (e.g.Bar),promotion(e.g.service judges).But their there is yet another source .i.e.”transfer from other service”.This method is slowly entering in to the service of higher judiciary &it is not found in the Constitution.Justice MM Ismail was appointed in Delhi High court,when that court was created for the first time[1964] .After an year he was appointed to our high court in( 1965).!! It was not an involuntary act.After 55 years there is a repeat performance in a reverse order!!!!](https://sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story Summon cannot be quashed Full order of THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W. P.No.35102 of 2016and W.M.P.No.30255 of 2016 Administrator, Isha Yoga Centre ,
- Previous story Musings on the Life & Times of Chinnaswamy Subramania Bharathi Narasimhan Vijayaraghavan 19
Recent Posts
- R Y George Williams requested the first bench CISF extent to entire high court as well as entire judiciary in Tamilnau and further argued that baricaurd between the city court and High court May be removed and it maye be covered to entire campus to avoid multiple bresking to enter the high court premises. CJ informed that direction issued to everywhere. and further RY George Williams argued that high court for got the security of the lower judiciary
- Today 5 law tips/ Vinothpandian: 2019 (4) SCC ( cri ) 469 : kamil vs state of Uttar pradesh : sentence or order passed by trial court in absence of charge or any error , omission or irregularity in the charge including any misjoinder cannot be held invalid by court of appeal confirmation or revision, unless the accused is prejudiced and failure of justice has been occasioned thereby (. Sec 464 CRPC )
- SPEECH OF THIRU P.WILSON MP ON EMPOWERMENT OF SC-ST- OBC AT JAWAHAR BHAWAN ON 24.4.2024.
- The Madras University Vice Chancellor Appointment matter filed by B. Jagannath- came up today for Hearing on 23.04.2024 before the Learned First Bench.
- Judge velmurugan order . (31)Accordingly, the Review Application is dismissed with an exemplarycost of Rs.2,00,000/- [Rupees Two Lakhs Only] payable to the 1st respondent / plaintiff within a period of two weeks from today. The application for appointment
More
Recent Posts
- R Y George Williams requested the first bench CISF extent to entire high court as well as entire judiciary in Tamilnau and further argued that baricaurd between the city court and High court May be removed and it maye be covered to entire campus to avoid multiple bresking to enter the high court premises. CJ informed that direction issued to everywhere. and further RY George Williams argued that high court for got the security of the lower judiciary
- Today 5 law tips/ Vinothpandian: 2019 (4) SCC ( cri ) 469 : kamil vs state of Uttar pradesh : sentence or order passed by trial court in absence of charge or any error , omission or irregularity in the charge including any misjoinder cannot be held invalid by court of appeal confirmation or revision, unless the accused is prejudiced and failure of justice has been occasioned thereby (. Sec 464 CRPC )
- SPEECH OF THIRU P.WILSON MP ON EMPOWERMENT OF SC-ST- OBC AT JAWAHAR BHAWAN ON 24.4.2024.
- The Madras University Vice Chancellor Appointment matter filed by B. Jagannath- came up today for Hearing on 23.04.2024 before the Learned First Bench.
- Judge velmurugan order . (31)Accordingly, the Review Application is dismissed with an exemplarycost of Rs.2,00,000/- [Rupees Two Lakhs Only] payable to the 1st respondent / plaintiff within a period of two weeks from today. The application for appointment