![[8/4, 13:13] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/imranhindu/status/1290551998526320640?s=08 [8/4, 13:15] Sekarreporter 1: Madras HC imposes costs of Rs.25,000 on a forest dept staff for challenging his transfer from Theni to Chennai though it was he who had requested for transfer to Chennai region. Directs him to pay the money to Cancer Institute at Adyar @THChennai](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story [9/7, 15:13] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1302905168841777154?s=08 [9/7, 15:13] Sekarreporter 1: TN School Education Secretary appears before Madras HC through video call to explain action initiated against schools that demanded more than 40% of fees this year in violation of court orders @THChennai
- Previous story The Supreme Court was informed by Additional-Solicitor General SV Raju that Attorney-General for India KK Venugopal is in self-quarantine after one of his colleagues tested positive for COVID-19.
Recent Posts
- http://youtube.com/post/UgkxAg7kpujWvtL21sksgS9DADuOI7cxFU0c?si=3B8lW4sX0GKhDmRc [18/06, 18:19] sekarreporter1: [18/06, 18:17] sekarreporter1: https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-judge-expected-to-engage-with-bar-not-sit-like-sphinx-538236 [18/06, 18:17] sekarreporter1: The Madras High Court recently observed that the Indian Evidence Act enables a judge to ask any question that he pleases during trial with respect to any relevant or irrelevant fact during the trial. [2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 269] The bench of Justice GR Swaminathan and Justice R Poornima held
- National Investigation Agency #NIA appropriates ₹1.13 crore of fees paid by a Bihari woman medical student who had pursued MBBS course at a private college in Chennai. The agency takes the action after booking her brother and uncle under UAPA for having allegedly collected funds for banned maoist activities in Jharkhand. #MadrasHighCourt Chief Justice’s Bench rejects the student’s plea to direct the college to issue a course completion certificate to her. Judges say she cannot assert an equitable right to benefit from the proceeds of a crime.i
- [18/06, 15:34] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxZv20Knss850Ix7rH8aaB_Y9Bquvj1ABy?si=9-o-8N9ytF4ECelb [18/06, 15:34] sekarreporter1: Judge should not sit like a sphinx, must engage with lawyers during hearings: Madras High Court | https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/judge-should-not-sit-like-a-sphinx-must-engage-with-lawyers-during-hearings-madras-high-court
- https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-mbbs-student-fee-seized-nia-maoist-connection-no-relief-538177 [18/06, 13:10] sekarreporter1: The Madras High Court recently refused to set aside an order of a single judge dismissing a student’s plea asking Chettinad Academy of Research and Education to grant her course
- THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.A.No.2422 of 2025 and CMP N os .18594 and 18595 of 2025 Puja Kumari, R/o. Village-Rustampur, P.O.- Hulasganj, P.S.-Ghoshi, District-Jahanabad, Bihar-804407, Currently residing at Sandhya Niwas, 69A Apartments, Nehru Nagar, Road, No.2, Patliputra, Patna, Bihar-800 013. Appellant(s) Vs 1. The Union of India through its Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi-110 011. 2. The President National Medical Commission, Pocket 14, Sector 8, Dwarka Phase 1, New Delhi – 110 077. 3. The Secretary Tamil Nadu Medical Council, 914, Poonamallee High Road, Arumbakkam, Chennai-600 016. 4. The Director General National Investigation Agency, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi – 110 003. 5. The Dean Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, OMR, Kelambakkam, Chengalpattu, Chennai – 603 103. Respondent(s)
More
Recent Posts
- http://youtube.com/post/UgkxAg7kpujWvtL21sksgS9DADuOI7cxFU0c?si=3B8lW4sX0GKhDmRc [18/06, 18:19] sekarreporter1: [18/06, 18:17] sekarreporter1: https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-judge-expected-to-engage-with-bar-not-sit-like-sphinx-538236 [18/06, 18:17] sekarreporter1: The Madras High Court recently observed that the Indian Evidence Act enables a judge to ask any question that he pleases during trial with respect to any relevant or irrelevant fact during the trial. [2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 269] The bench of Justice GR Swaminathan and Justice R Poornima held
- National Investigation Agency #NIA appropriates ₹1.13 crore of fees paid by a Bihari woman medical student who had pursued MBBS course at a private college in Chennai. The agency takes the action after booking her brother and uncle under UAPA for having allegedly collected funds for banned maoist activities in Jharkhand. #MadrasHighCourt Chief Justice’s Bench rejects the student’s plea to direct the college to issue a course completion certificate to her. Judges say she cannot assert an equitable right to benefit from the proceeds of a crime.i
- [18/06, 15:34] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxZv20Knss850Ix7rH8aaB_Y9Bquvj1ABy?si=9-o-8N9ytF4ECelb [18/06, 15:34] sekarreporter1: Judge should not sit like a sphinx, must engage with lawyers during hearings: Madras High Court | https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/judge-should-not-sit-like-a-sphinx-must-engage-with-lawyers-during-hearings-madras-high-court
- https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-mbbs-student-fee-seized-nia-maoist-connection-no-relief-538177 [18/06, 13:10] sekarreporter1: The Madras High Court recently refused to set aside an order of a single judge dismissing a student’s plea asking Chettinad Academy of Research and Education to grant her course
- THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.A.No.2422 of 2025 and CMP N os .18594 and 18595 of 2025 Puja Kumari, R/o. Village-Rustampur, P.O.- Hulasganj, P.S.-Ghoshi, District-Jahanabad, Bihar-804407, Currently residing at Sandhya Niwas, 69A Apartments, Nehru Nagar, Road, No.2, Patliputra, Patna, Bihar-800 013. Appellant(s) Vs 1. The Union of India through its Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi-110 011. 2. The President National Medical Commission, Pocket 14, Sector 8, Dwarka Phase 1, New Delhi – 110 077. 3. The Secretary Tamil Nadu Medical Council, 914, Poonamallee High Road, Arumbakkam, Chennai-600 016. 4. The Director General National Investigation Agency, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi – 110 003. 5. The Dean Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, OMR, Kelambakkam, Chengalpattu, Chennai – 603 103. Respondent(s)