in the Madras high court, the bench of justices S M Subramaniam and A D Maria Clete issued directions on a public interest litigation petition filed by C M Raghavan, seeking action against a contractor for allegedly laying a substandard road in Tirunelveli.

Read ePaper
News
Chennai
TOI Games
Live Videos
Real Estate
World
India
Business
Tech
TOI Newsletters
Cricket
Sports
Entertainment
TV
Voice Of Conscience
Web Series
Life & Style
Education
Speaking Tree

Trending
Delhi Triple MurderNashik Leopard DeathBengaluru Namma MetroBengaluru Constable SuspendedMumbai Mosque Loudspeaker NewsUttarakhand Cloudburst
Tamil Nadu’s shoddy roads: Here, the right to life ends in a pothole
AUG 10, 2025, 23:33 IST

The Constitution guarantees the Right to Life and Personal Liberty under Article 21. It has been judicially expanded to cover everything from the right to dignity to the right to sleep. But apparently, not the right to survive your morning commute
Follow Us
Srimathi Venkatachari
Recently, in the Madras high court, the bench of justices S M Subramaniam and A D Maria Clete issued directions on a public interest litigation petition filed by C M Raghavan, seeking action against a contractor for allegedly laying a substandard road in Tirunelveli.

Tired of too many ads?
Go Ad Free Now
The judges observed that private contractors in collusion with officials are laying roads using substandard materials without adhering to govt standards. The competent authorities are bound to inspect while road projects are being implemented, they added.
The state has to issue stern instructions to its officials that in the event of damage or violation, contractor and inspecting officials will be held responsible and the financial losses assessed recovered from all concerned, the judges observed.

You Can Also Check: Chennai AQI | Weather in Chennai | Bank Holidays in Chennai | Public Holidays in Chennai
The Supreme Court in Umri Pooph Pratappur Tollways Pvt Ltd vs M P road development corporation (2025) held that “the contract for laying of a state highway/district road, when assigned by the corporation owned and run by the govt, assumes the character of a public function — even if performed by a private party — and would satisfy the functionality test to sustain the writ petition”.
In 2023, the case of Shobana, a software engineer from Zoho, who lost control of her two-wheeler after hitting a pothole and died on the spot, made headlines.

BY TABOOLAPROMOTED LINKS
YOU MAY LIKE
Download the TOI App Now
The death of Shobana is not an “accident” in the colloquial sense. It was designed by apathy, systemic neglect and a civic culture that treats the citizens’ right to life as collateral damage in the cycle of shoddy public works and zero accountability.
Her death joined the silent parade of 1,856 Indians who die each year in pothole-related crashes as per 2022 data from the Ministry of road transport and highways.
Even Zoho’s CEO, Sridhar Vembu, felt compelled to speak publicly about it: “One of our engineers, Shobana, died tragically when her scooter skidded on the heavily potholed roads …”
The Constitution, in its noble abstraction, guarantees the Right to Life and Personal Liberty under Article 21.

Tired of too many ads?
Go Ad Free Now
It has been judicially expanded to cover everything from the right to dignity to the right to sleep. But apparently, not the right to survive your morning commute.
In Consumer Education and Research Centre vs Union of India, AIR 1995 SC 922, the Supreme Court held that the right to life includes the right to health and safe working conditions, but stated that unsafe infrastructure violates constitutional rights.
So, if a person dies because their scooter plunges into a pothole large enough to hold municipal accountability, isn’t that a constitutional violation?
in theory, there are remedies:
Tort Law: You can sue the state for negligence.
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: File a compensation claim under Section 166.
Section 304A IPC: Causing death by negligence is a crime.
But in practice? It’s a game of snakes without ladders.
Take the case of Nilabati Behera vs State of Orissa (1993). Here, compensation was awarded for a custodial death due to state inaction. But when it comes to potholes, courts often stop at angry observations and moral outrage. The