IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Orders Reserved on 30.10.2020 Pronounced on 09.11.2020 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH anna university case For Respondent : Mr.P.H.Arvind Pandian in both WPs Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.L.P.Shanmugasundaram Standing Counsel

  1. E[11/13, 12:47] Sekarreporter 1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
    Orders Reserved on 30.10.2020
    Pronounced on 09.11.2020

    CORAM
    THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH
    W.P.Nos.3175 of 2016, 4695 of 2016
    and WMP Nos.4082, 2608, 2607 of 2016
    WP No.3175 of 2016
    1. R.Ezhilarasan
    2. R.Srikanth
    3. S.Palanisamy
    4. S.Chandar
    5. E.Thiyagarajan
    6. G.Saravanan
    7. P.Natarajan
    8.G.Ranjith
    9.S.Parvathy
    10.N.Mohan Kumar
    11.S.Kala
    12.M.Kumar
    13. U.Chinnaraj
    14. G.Saravanan
    15. K.Senthil
    16. M.Lalitha
    17.G.Pannerselvam
    18. G.Sureshkumar
    19. D.Balu
    20. K.Sathish Kumar
    21. R.Ananthakumar
    1/26
    http://www.judis.nic.in
    [11/13, 12:48] Sekarreporter 1: interview concluded on 28.01.2014 and thereafter fill up the remaining posts
    of Office Assistant pursuant to the Advt.No.001/PR 33/2016 dated
    13.01.2016.
    Prayer in WP No.4695 of 2016 :- Writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the
    Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the
    respondent to regularise the services of the petitioners as Office Assistant
    pursuant to the Circular No.001/PR 62 / 2013 dated 25.04.2013 and
    interview concluded on 27.01.2014 and thereafter fill up the remaining posts
    of Office Assistant pursuant to the Advt.No.001/PR 33/2016 dated
    13.01.2016.
    For Petitioners : Mr.C.Selvaraj, Senior Counsel
    in both Wps for M/s.C.S.Associates
    For Respondent : Mr.P.H.Arvind Pandian
    in both WPs Additional Advocate General
    Assisted by
    Mr.L.P.Shanmugasundaram
    Standing Counsel
    O R D E R
    The issues involved in both the writ petitions are common
    and hence, they are taken up together and this common order is
    passed.
    3/26
    http://www.judis.nic.in
    [11/13, 12:49] Sekarreporter 1: issue any positive direction in this regard.
    16. Insofar as the claim made by the learned Senior Counsel on
    the Principal of Equal pay for Equal work, it is always left open to the
    petitioners to make a representation to the University in this regard
    and if the University decides to continue with the services of the
    petitioners, the representation can be considered strictly in
    accordance with law.
    17. In view of the above discussion, this Court is not in a
    position to grant the relief as prayed for in these writ petitions and
    both the writ petitions are accordingly dismissed. No costs.
    Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
    09.11.2020
    rka
    Index : Yes
    Internet : Yes
    24/26
    http://www.judis.nic.in

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Call Now ButtonCALL ME