![] Arokiyadash Advt: My experience in KVJ’s Court While his Lordship K. Venkatraman sitting in CRP, as junior advocate, hardly 1 year experience, i represented for getting adjournment, as my senior asked. Since it was around 4pm and about ring bell at 4.30pm.](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story Satta Panchayat Iyakkam moves #MadrasHC seeking to restrain TN state election commission from declaring the election results of rural local bodies till elections are conducted to urban local bodies. @timesofindia #LocalBodyElection
- Previous story HC to give up practice of printing bulky cause lists: Registry asks lawyers to access list of cases online from Jan. 1
Recent Posts
- Rule 37 amendment – Implications for taxpayers OCTOBER 07, 2022 By K Aarthy, Advocate, G N Law Associates IN GST regime, the credit of input taxes charged on any supply of goods and services or both can be availed by the taxpayers subject to conditions prescribed in Section 16 of the CGST Act, 2017
- Mhc orders oct 6
- worshipping of a god cannot be stopped by closing of the temple due to the dispute between the two rival groups. THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU P(MD)No.23296 of 2022and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.17384 and 17385 of 2022 K.Seeni Thevar For Petitioner : Mr.C.Selvaraj For R1, R2 & R4 : Mr.D.Gandhiraj, Special Government Pleader For R3 : Mr.S.Manohar O R D E R
- The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice R.THARANI CRL OP(MD). No.17679 of 2021 Umamaheswari … Petitioner/Defacto Complainant Vs.
- In the result, these criminal appeals are dismissed as being devoid of merits. (P.N.P.,J.) (TKR,J.)
More
Recent Posts
- Rule 37 amendment – Implications for taxpayers OCTOBER 07, 2022 By K Aarthy, Advocate, G N Law Associates IN GST regime, the credit of input taxes charged on any supply of goods and services or both can be availed by the taxpayers subject to conditions prescribed in Section 16 of the CGST Act, 2017
- Mhc orders oct 6
- worshipping of a god cannot be stopped by closing of the temple due to the dispute between the two rival groups. THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU P(MD)No.23296 of 2022and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.17384 and 17385 of 2022 K.Seeni Thevar For Petitioner : Mr.C.Selvaraj For R1, R2 & R4 : Mr.D.Gandhiraj, Special Government Pleader For R3 : Mr.S.Manohar O R D E R
- The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice R.THARANI CRL OP(MD). No.17679 of 2021 Umamaheswari … Petitioner/Defacto Complainant Vs.
- In the result, these criminal appeals are dismissed as being devoid of merits. (P.N.P.,J.) (TKR,J.)
