![[12/11, 18:42] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1337384635890688002?s=08 [12/11, 18:43] Sekarreporter1: #BREAKING மதுரை மாவட்டத்தில் புதிய இடங்களில் கிரானைட் குவாரிகள் தொடங்க மறு உத்தரவு பிறப்பிக்கும் வரை புதிய உரிமம் வழங்க கூடாது – தமிழக அரசுக்கு சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவு tssj mjj #GraniteCase | #TNGovt | #HighCourt. For quary senior advt p willson for govt ag argued https://t.co/thCW9kDskx](https://sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1341335474950950913?s=08 [12/22, 16:21] Sekarreporter1: [12/22, 16:17] Sekarreporter1: W.P.No.17640 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15.12.2020 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH
- Previous story [12/22, 14:56] Sekarreporter1: [12/22, 14:56] Sekarreporter1: [12/22, 14:56] Sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/yS7vfJITkK0 [12/22, 14:56] Sekarreporter1: .☘️☘️ [12/22, 14:56] Sekarreporter1: Reporter malar [12/22, 14:57] Mukesh Puthiyathaimurai Jounalist: 👏👏👍
Recent Posts
- [24/04, 20:20] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: WHAT IF THE POLICE OFFICER FAILED TO REGISTER THE FIR INLIGHT OF THE DIRECTION ISSUED BY THE MAGISTRATE UNDER SECTION 156(3) OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE?
- In view of our decision holding the Tamil Nadu Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Amendment Act 33 of 2010 as repugnant, void andultra vires the Constitution, the proceedings initiatedagainst the appellants by issuance of show cause notices in exercise of the power of such enactment are unsustainable and, as such, the common order ofthe learned Single Judge dated 3.7.2023 in W.P.Nos.17331, 13507, 13510, 13514, 14424,14426, 14428, 14432, 16963, 17164, 17399,17371, 18475 and 18479 of 2023 is set aside.(ii) The respective show cause notices/orders issued against the appellants shall stand quashed. However, the respondent authorities will be at liberty to initiatefresh proceedings under the Waqf Act, 1995, as amended, in accordance with law.(iii) There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, all connected miscellaneous petitionsare closed.(S.V.G., CJ.) (D.B.C., J.)23.04.2024
- Today MBA evening NAVJ / on “A Judge Criticizing his own Judgment in thematter of Suit for Land”/
- [25/04, 11:08] sekarreporter1: ,[25/04, 11:03] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/EqQEISHw-MQ?si=Vx_4sGsqVTaEXeBj[25/04, 11:03] sekarreporter1: [25/04, 10:55] sekarreporter1: Senior Advocate Srinath Sridevan recalled an interesting anecdote about former A-G R Krishnamoorthy, a doyen of Madras Bar
- R Y George Williams requested the first bench CISF extent to entire high court as well as entire judiciary in Tamilnau and further argued that baricaurd between the city court and High court May be removed and it maye be covered to entire campus to avoid multiple bresking to enter the high court premises. CJ informed that direction issued to everywhere. and further RY George Williams argued that high court for got the security of the lower judiciary
More
Recent Posts
- [24/04, 20:20] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: WHAT IF THE POLICE OFFICER FAILED TO REGISTER THE FIR INLIGHT OF THE DIRECTION ISSUED BY THE MAGISTRATE UNDER SECTION 156(3) OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE?
- In view of our decision holding the Tamil Nadu Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Amendment Act 33 of 2010 as repugnant, void andultra vires the Constitution, the proceedings initiatedagainst the appellants by issuance of show cause notices in exercise of the power of such enactment are unsustainable and, as such, the common order ofthe learned Single Judge dated 3.7.2023 in W.P.Nos.17331, 13507, 13510, 13514, 14424,14426, 14428, 14432, 16963, 17164, 17399,17371, 18475 and 18479 of 2023 is set aside.(ii) The respective show cause notices/orders issued against the appellants shall stand quashed. However, the respondent authorities will be at liberty to initiatefresh proceedings under the Waqf Act, 1995, as amended, in accordance with law.(iii) There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, all connected miscellaneous petitionsare closed.(S.V.G., CJ.) (D.B.C., J.)23.04.2024
- Today MBA evening NAVJ / on “A Judge Criticizing his own Judgment in thematter of Suit for Land”/
- [25/04, 11:08] sekarreporter1: ,[25/04, 11:03] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/EqQEISHw-MQ?si=Vx_4sGsqVTaEXeBj[25/04, 11:03] sekarreporter1: [25/04, 10:55] sekarreporter1: Senior Advocate Srinath Sridevan recalled an interesting anecdote about former A-G R Krishnamoorthy, a doyen of Madras Bar
- R Y George Williams requested the first bench CISF extent to entire high court as well as entire judiciary in Tamilnau and further argued that baricaurd between the city court and High court May be removed and it maye be covered to entire campus to avoid multiple bresking to enter the high court premises. CJ informed that direction issued to everywhere. and further RY George Williams argued that high court for got the security of the lower judiciary