Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1341335474950950913?s=08 [12/22, 16:21] Sekarreporter1: [12/22, 16:17] Sekarreporter1: W.P.No.17640 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15.12.2020 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

[12/22, 16:21] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1341335474950950913?s=08
[12/22, 16:21] Sekarreporter1: [12/22, 16:17] Sekarreporter1: W.P.No.17640 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 15.12.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH
W.P.Nos.18721, 18725 and 18730 of 2020
and
WMP Nos.23251, 23249, 23254, 23255, 23262 to 23264 of 2020
W.P.No.18721 of 2020
J.Jayaniithaa ..Petitioner
in W.P.No.18721 of 2020
.Vs.
1.Inspector General of Registration,
100, Santhome High Road,
Raja Annamalai Puram,
Chennai-600 028.
2.The District Registrar (Administration),
South Chennai,
No.9, Jones Road,
Saidapet, Chennai 600 015.
Page No.1/18
http://www.judis.nic.in
[12/22, 16:17] Sekarreporter1: W.P.No.17640 of 2020
Prayer in W.P.No.18730of 2020: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of
Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling
for the records of the 3
rd respondent pertaining to the impugned
settlement deed dated 15.04.2015 registered as Document No.2638 of
2015 on the file of SRO, Alandur, executed by late P.Deekaraman in
favour of D.Netaji, the 4
th respondent herein and to quash the same and
consequently direct the 3
rd respondent to remove the entry of settlement
deed dated in Document No.2638 of 2015 dated 15.04.2015 from their
records.
For Petitioner
in All WPs : Mr.Abudu Kumar Rajarathinam
for Mr.G.Krishna Kumar
For RR 1 to 3
in All WPs : Mr.T.M.Pappaiah
Special Government Pleader
Page No.5/18
http://www.judis.nic.in
[12/22, 16:18] Sekarreporter1: W.P.No.17640 of 2020
proceedings initiated before the Civil Court does not come to an end that
quickly and it is a long drawn journey.
10. In a case of this nature, this Court has to necessarily find a
way out in exercise of its Jurisdiction under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India. It is clear from the above that the Settlement Deed
has been executed by the father of the 4
th
respondent without any right,
title or or authority and the Settlement Deed dt. 15.04.2015 is non est in
the eye of law. This is the second time this Court is dealing with the
rights of the petitioners and the relevant portions extracted supra from
the earlier Orders passed by this Court, is enough to establish the right of
the petitioners over the subject property. In the present Writ Petitions,
the same can only be reiterated by this Court.
11. In view of the above, this Court holds that the Settlement
Deed dt. 15.04.2015, registered as Document Nos.2637 and 2638 of 2015
executed by the father of the 4
th
respondent in favour of the 4
th
Page No.15/18
http://www.judis.nic.in
[12/22, 16:18] Sekarreporter1: W.P.No.17640 of 2020
respondent as non-est in the eye of law. The petitioners shall present this
order for registration before the 3
rd
respondent and the 3
rd
respondent
shall register the same on payment of the necessary stamp duty and
registration fees. By such registration, the earlier entries made in
Document Nos. 2637 and 2638 of 2015, will get automatically reversed.
12.All these Writ Petitions are accordingly allowed with the
above directions. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous
petitions are closed.
15.12.2020
Internet:Yes
Index:Yes
KP
Page No.16/18
http://www.judis.nic.in

You may also like...