https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/divorce-plea-objection-disentitle-wife-interim-maintenance-jammu-kashmir-hc
https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/divorce-plea-objection-disentitle-wife-interim-maintenance-jammu-kashmir-hc
![Section 227 CrPC: Defence Of Accused Cannot Be Looked Into While Considering His Discharge Petition: Reiterates SC [Read Judgment] https://t.co/KVj8ACZfGo](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story Please help them study, judges appeal to the richbench comprising Justices N Kirubakaran and B Pugalendhi observed
- Previous story https://www.theleaflet.in/ag-okays-yet-another-contempt-case-against-kunal-kamra-for-his-middle-finger-tweet-against-the-cji/
Recent Posts
- HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL RC NO. 462 OF 2026 1. D.Sathishkumar S/o.Deiveegam, 2/134, Kattu Valavu, Kullampatti Village, Vazhappadi Taluk, Salem District. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. State Rep. by The Inspector of PoliceCrime Branch CID, OCU, Salem.
- THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-05-2026 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE G. R. SWAMINATHAN AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN WMP No.21519 & 21523 of 2026 in WP No. 20111 of 2026 T.R.Ramesh ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary, Tourism, Culture and Religious Endowments Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai 600
- Justice C Kumarappan observed that while the court has to exercise its discretion in a humane and compassionate manner, considering the past conduct, there was every possibility of delaying the trial.
- Author is a Senior Advocate at the Madras High Court and an International Energy Law Consultant. He advises Indian public sector undertakings and private entities on cross-border energy, critical minerals, and ECTA trade law, with offices in Chennai, New Delhi, and a FIFO venue in Sydney.
- Ed k n neru In these circumstances and taking into consideration the statement of the then Advocate General made at the Bar, we direct the State authorities not to undertake any further proceedings against any of the parties till the next date of hearing. 8. List these cases on 23.6.2026 as already directed on 28.4.2026. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 05.06.2026 sasi
More
Recent Posts
- HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL RC NO. 462 OF 2026 1. D.Sathishkumar S/o.Deiveegam, 2/134, Kattu Valavu, Kullampatti Village, Vazhappadi Taluk, Salem District. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. State Rep. by The Inspector of PoliceCrime Branch CID, OCU, Salem.
- THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-05-2026 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE G. R. SWAMINATHAN AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN WMP No.21519 & 21523 of 2026 in WP No. 20111 of 2026 T.R.Ramesh ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary, Tourism, Culture and Religious Endowments Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai 600
- Justice C Kumarappan observed that while the court has to exercise its discretion in a humane and compassionate manner, considering the past conduct, there was every possibility of delaying the trial.
- Author is a Senior Advocate at the Madras High Court and an International Energy Law Consultant. He advises Indian public sector undertakings and private entities on cross-border energy, critical minerals, and ECTA trade law, with offices in Chennai, New Delhi, and a FIFO venue in Sydney.
- Ed k n neru In these circumstances and taking into consideration the statement of the then Advocate General made at the Bar, we direct the State authorities not to undertake any further proceedings against any of the parties till the next date of hearing. 8. List these cases on 23.6.2026 as already directed on 28.4.2026. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 05.06.2026 sasi