Follow:
- Next story [3/4, 17:53] Sekarreporter 1: [3/4, 17:47] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: Very rarely an additional judge is transferred before becoming permanent!it is not the case of justice kannan who went to P&H hc.It looks as if he was originally to be appointed in Delhi HC.Since that might not have been possible he was appointed here only to be shifted by transfer mode!Madras Hc has become launching pad for many and it looks like a transit house!!It is a pity that the Bar never discusses such issues! [3/4, 17:51] Sekarreporter 1: [3/4, 18:01] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: In service law there are several methods of appointing a person to a post.They are direct recruitment (e.g.Bar),promotion(e.g.service judges).But their there is yet another source .i.e.”transfer from other service”.This method is slowly entering in to the service of higher judiciary &it is not found in the Constitution.Justice MM Ismail was appointed in Delhi High court,when that court was created for the first time[1964] .After an year he was appointed to our high court in( 1965).!! It was not an involuntary act.After 55 years there is a repeat performance in a reverse order!!!!
- Previous story (TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA, PART 1 SECTION 2) No.K-13026/0 112020-US.I Government of India Ministry of Law and Justice (Department of Justice) Jaisalmer House, 26, Man Singh Road, NEW DELHI-I 10 011, dated 04th March, 2020. NOTIFICATION In exercise of the power conferred by clause (1) of Article 222 of the Constitution of India, the President, after consultation with the Chief Justice of India, is pleased to transfer Shri Justice Subramonium Prasad, Additional Judge of the Madras High Court, as an Additional Judge of the Delhi High Court and to direct him to assume charge of his office in the Delhi High Court. (Raji~h~:; Joint Secretary to the Government of India Tele: 2338 3037 To The Manager, Government of India Press, Minto Road, New Delhi.
Recent Posts
- Quashed Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy
- POCSO Act, Coimbatore is set aside. The appellant is acquitted of all the charges under Section 363 of IPC and Section 5(1), 6 of POCSO Act. The bail bond, if any executed by the appellant, shall stand cancelled. Fine amount, if any paid, shall be refunded to the appellant forthwith. 06.06.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order lok To 1.The learned Principal Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Coimbatore. 2.The Inspector of Police, Race Course Police Station, Coimbatore City, Coimbatore 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court. G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. lok Crl.A.No.151 of 2023 06.06.2025
- Will case Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Appeal Suit No.180 of 2022 & C.M.P.No.6571 of 2022
- Accordingly, these Criminal Appeals stand allowed. The conviction and sentence imposed by the learned Special Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate at Chengalpattu in in Special S.C.No.8 of 2013, vide the order, dated 19.09.2023 shall stand set aside. The fine amount, if any paid, is ordered to be refunded. 07.07.2025 Neutral Citation : yes/no grs To 1. The Special Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chengalpattu. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Chennai City – I, R.A.Puram, Chennai. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. grs Crl.A.Nos.1186 and 1131 of 2023 07.07.2025 [1] (2023) 16 SCC 141 [2] (2021) 3 SCC 687 [3] AIR 2023 SC 330 [4] (2023) 18 SCC 251 [5] (2014) 13 SCC 55
- This Writ Appeal is therefore, allowed, the order dated 0509.2024 of the learned Sessions Judge in-charge of the Special Court for Trial of Criminal Cases relating to Elected MPs / MLAs is quashed. The matter is remitted to the Presiding Officer. He shall issue notice to the petitioner, hear her objections and thereafter, decide in accordance with law without being influenced by any communication made by the High Court or by the Government. The Officer shall go strictly in terms of the provisions of the related service rules. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (R.S.M., J.) (K.S., J.) 03.07.2025 kkn Internet: Yes Index: No Speaking Neutral Citation : No To:- 1.The Secretary to Government, Home (Courts-VI) Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 9. 2.The Secretary to Government, Labour Welfare & Skill Development Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 9. 3.The Registrar General, High Court, Madras. 4.The Sessions Judge, Special Court No.I for Trial of Criminal Cases Relating to elected MPs & MLAs of Tamil Nadu, ‘Singaravelar Maaligai’, Chennai – 1. 5.The Registrar, City Civil Court, Chennai – 1. 6.The Principal Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and K.SURENDER, J. KKN W.P.No. 4478 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos. 4981 & 4983 of 2025 03.07.2025
More
Recent Posts
- Quashed Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy
- POCSO Act, Coimbatore is set aside. The appellant is acquitted of all the charges under Section 363 of IPC and Section 5(1), 6 of POCSO Act. The bail bond, if any executed by the appellant, shall stand cancelled. Fine amount, if any paid, shall be refunded to the appellant forthwith. 06.06.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order lok To 1.The learned Principal Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Coimbatore. 2.The Inspector of Police, Race Course Police Station, Coimbatore City, Coimbatore 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court. G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. lok Crl.A.No.151 of 2023 06.06.2025
- Will case Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Appeal Suit No.180 of 2022 & C.M.P.No.6571 of 2022
- Accordingly, these Criminal Appeals stand allowed. The conviction and sentence imposed by the learned Special Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate at Chengalpattu in in Special S.C.No.8 of 2013, vide the order, dated 19.09.2023 shall stand set aside. The fine amount, if any paid, is ordered to be refunded. 07.07.2025 Neutral Citation : yes/no grs To 1. The Special Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chengalpattu. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Chennai City – I, R.A.Puram, Chennai. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. grs Crl.A.Nos.1186 and 1131 of 2023 07.07.2025 [1] (2023) 16 SCC 141 [2] (2021) 3 SCC 687 [3] AIR 2023 SC 330 [4] (2023) 18 SCC 251 [5] (2014) 13 SCC 55
- This Writ Appeal is therefore, allowed, the order dated 0509.2024 of the learned Sessions Judge in-charge of the Special Court for Trial of Criminal Cases relating to Elected MPs / MLAs is quashed. The matter is remitted to the Presiding Officer. He shall issue notice to the petitioner, hear her objections and thereafter, decide in accordance with law without being influenced by any communication made by the High Court or by the Government. The Officer shall go strictly in terms of the provisions of the related service rules. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (R.S.M., J.) (K.S., J.) 03.07.2025 kkn Internet: Yes Index: No Speaking Neutral Citation : No To:- 1.The Secretary to Government, Home (Courts-VI) Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 9. 2.The Secretary to Government, Labour Welfare & Skill Development Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 9. 3.The Registrar General, High Court, Madras. 4.The Sessions Judge, Special Court No.I for Trial of Criminal Cases Relating to elected MPs & MLAs of Tamil Nadu, ‘Singaravelar Maaligai’, Chennai – 1. 5.The Registrar, City Civil Court, Chennai – 1. 6.The Principal Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and K.SURENDER, J. KKN W.P.No. 4478 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos. 4981 & 4983 of 2025 03.07.2025
