Follow:
- Next story 6/25, 17:00] Sekarreporter 1: [6/25, 16:58] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1276115004664639488?s=08 [6/25, 17:00] Sekarreporter 1: [6/25, 16:51] Sekarreporter 1: சசிகலாவின் பினாமி எனக் கூறி, தனது சொத்துக்களை முடக்கம் செய்து பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவை எதிர்த்து நிதி நிறுவன உரிமையாளர் தாக்கல் செய்த மனுவுக்கு இரண்டு வாரங்களில் பதிலளிக்க, வருமான வரித் துறைக்கு சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது.judge r mahadevan https://t.co/GXbA0X8d3M [6/25, 17:02] Sekarreporter 1: IN THE IDGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) W.P.NO. Mr. V. S. J. Dinakaran, No.
- Previous story MMBA, Madurai invites you to a scheduled Zoominar today 5 o clock
Recent Posts
- CJ Bench 8 WA/175/2026 (Forest) THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST AND VS SRI KANCHI KAMAKOTI PEETHAM AND 4 OTHERS. STATE GOVERNMENT PLEADER
- No mudslinging against judges’: Madras HC pulls up lawyer in Savukku Shankar case During the bail proceedings, Shankar’s counsel alleged that the judge had exhibited bias by referring to Shankar
- Justice Vijayakumar of the Madras High Court, it observed that since the Censor Board had already granted certification, the court could not interfere. Granting liberty to file a public interest litigation in connection with the issue, the judge disposed of the case with this order.
- Saravanan dmk sanathanam
- Justices G. R. Swaminathan and B. Pugalendhi directed the TNPCB to take action against Madurai Corporation as per Section 48 of the Act that deals with offences by government departments. Earlier, the State government had told
More
Recent Posts
- CJ Bench 8 WA/175/2026 (Forest) THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST AND VS SRI KANCHI KAMAKOTI PEETHAM AND 4 OTHERS. STATE GOVERNMENT PLEADER
- No mudslinging against judges’: Madras HC pulls up lawyer in Savukku Shankar case During the bail proceedings, Shankar’s counsel alleged that the judge had exhibited bias by referring to Shankar
- Justice Vijayakumar of the Madras High Court, it observed that since the Censor Board had already granted certification, the court could not interfere. Granting liberty to file a public interest litigation in connection with the issue, the judge disposed of the case with this order.
- Saravanan dmk sanathanam
- Justices G. R. Swaminathan and B. Pugalendhi directed the TNPCB to take action against Madurai Corporation as per Section 48 of the Act that deals with offences by government departments. Earlier, the State government had told