Follow:
- Next story [3/22, 08:20] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1241357627189153794?s=08 [3/22, 08:20] Sekarreporter 1: சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்ற நீதிபதி எஸ்.வைத்தியநாதன் …. பாதுகாப்பை உறுதிபடுத்த வேண்டும், சுத்தத்தை உறுதிபடுத்த வேண்டும், இடைவெளி அவசியம், பாட்டி சொல் முட்டாள்த்தனம் என்றும், தீண்டாமையை போதிப்பதாகவும் இளைஞர்கள் நினைக்கின்றனர். எல்லா மதங்களும் நல்லதையே போதிக்கின்றது. பாட்டிகளின் அறிவுரைகளில் மறைந்த கிடக்கின்ற அறிவியல் போதனைகளை புரிந்து கொள்ள தவறிவிட்டோம். மூத்தோரின் சொல்லை கண்மூடித்தனமாக நம்பியதாக நமது பாட்டிகள் நினைக்கவில்லை. சுத்தம் தொடர்பான பாட்டிகளின் அறிவியல் போதனைகளை புரிந்துகொள்வதகான காலம் இன்னும் கடந்து விடவில்லை. வைரஸ் தாக்கினால் நம்மால் மீண்டு வர முடியாது. இந்தியா தற்போது சிக்கலான சூழ்நிலையை எதிர்கொண்டுள்ளது. அதனால் நாம் ஒவ்வொருவரும் நமக்கு உதவி செய்துகொள்வோம். இப்போது மட்டுமல்ல எதிர்காலத்திலும் பாதுகாப்பு முன்னெச்செரிக்கையை மேற்கொள்ளாவிட்டால் இத்தாலியை விட மோசமான சூழலை சந்திக்க நேரிடும். நமது கடைசி மூச்சு இருக்கும் வரை மாசற்ற நோயற்ற வாழ்வை வாழ வேண்டுமென ஒவ்வொரு தனி மனிதனும் உறுதி செய்து கொள்ள வேண்டும். வேளாண் நிலங்கள் மற்றும் நீர் நிலைகள் போன்ற இயற்கையை அழித்துவிட்ட நாம் வறட்சியையும், பஞ்சம் தண்ணீர் பிரச்சினையை எதிர்கொள்ள இருக்கிறோம்.
- Previous story https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1241331028628656128?s=08
Recent Posts
- The Madras High Court recently directed a taxpayer to file a revocation application to reinstate their GST registration, which was cancelled due to alleged suspicious transactions in their bank and portal. Here’s a breakdown of the case¹: – *Background*: The taxpayer’s GST registration was cancelled, prompting them to approach the Madras High Court. – *Court’s Directive*: The court directed the taxpayer to file a revocation application along with supporting documentation. – *Procedure*: The department will issue a notice for a personal hearing within three days of receiving the application. A reasoned order will be passed within two weeks after the hearing, ensuring the taxpayer is given an opportunity to present their case. – *Precedent*: This decision aligns with previous judgments where the Madras High Court has allowed taxpayers to apply for revocation of cancellation of registration under certain circumstances, such as when the taxpayer has a reasonable explanation for the delay in filing the application.² *Key Takeaways* – *Revocation Application*: Taxpayers can apply for revocation of cancellation of registration under Section 30 of the GST Act. – *Supporting Documentation*: The taxpayer must provide supporting documentation to substantiate their claim. – *Opportunity for Hearing*: The department must provide an opportunity for a personal hearing before passing a reasoned order. – *Timeframe*: The department is required to pass a reasoned order within two weeks after the hearing. It’s essential for taxpayers to understand the procedures and timelines for revocation of cancellation of registration to ensure compliance with GST regulations.
- [12/05, 07:57] Meta AI: Justice Krishnan Ramasamy’s decision involves a case where the petitioner’s explanation was deemed reasonable and sincere, particularly due to their reliance on expert advice. The key points of the judgment are¹: – *Reasonable Explanation*: The petitioner provided a valid explanation that was accepted by the court. – *Reliance on Expert Advice*: The petitioner’s actions were guided by expert advice, which contributed to the court’s favorable view. – *Cancellation of Cancellation Order*: As a result, the court canceled the cancellation order, effectively reversing a previous decision. Without more context about the case, it’s difficult to provide further details. However, this decision suggests that the court valued the petitioner’s transparency and good faith in following expert advice. [12/05, 07:57] sekarreporter1: Case number and order copy
- Meta AI: This appears to be a legal update where: – *Lordship Justice Nakkiran*: Made a decision regarding a review application. – *Division Bench’s Observations*: The judge referenced observations made by a division bench (a panel of two or more judges) in reaching the conclusion.
- Meta AI: This appears to be a court case where: – *Contempt Petition*: A petition was filed against the Chief Secretary and Home Secretary of the Government of Tamil Nadu. – *Fine Imposed*: A fine of ₹5 lakhs was imposed. – *Judges*: The case was heard by MR. JUSTICE R. SUBRAMANIAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE. – *Petitioner*: Elephant G. Rajendran, an advocate, filed the contempt petition
- HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI S.A.(MD)No.559 of 2023 and C.M.P(MD)No.13186 of 2023 The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by The District Collector, Madurai. … Appellant / Appellant / Defendant -Vs-
More
Recent Posts
- The Madras High Court recently directed a taxpayer to file a revocation application to reinstate their GST registration, which was cancelled due to alleged suspicious transactions in their bank and portal. Here’s a breakdown of the case¹: – *Background*: The taxpayer’s GST registration was cancelled, prompting them to approach the Madras High Court. – *Court’s Directive*: The court directed the taxpayer to file a revocation application along with supporting documentation. – *Procedure*: The department will issue a notice for a personal hearing within three days of receiving the application. A reasoned order will be passed within two weeks after the hearing, ensuring the taxpayer is given an opportunity to present their case. – *Precedent*: This decision aligns with previous judgments where the Madras High Court has allowed taxpayers to apply for revocation of cancellation of registration under certain circumstances, such as when the taxpayer has a reasonable explanation for the delay in filing the application.² *Key Takeaways* – *Revocation Application*: Taxpayers can apply for revocation of cancellation of registration under Section 30 of the GST Act. – *Supporting Documentation*: The taxpayer must provide supporting documentation to substantiate their claim. – *Opportunity for Hearing*: The department must provide an opportunity for a personal hearing before passing a reasoned order. – *Timeframe*: The department is required to pass a reasoned order within two weeks after the hearing. It’s essential for taxpayers to understand the procedures and timelines for revocation of cancellation of registration to ensure compliance with GST regulations.
- [12/05, 07:57] Meta AI: Justice Krishnan Ramasamy’s decision involves a case where the petitioner’s explanation was deemed reasonable and sincere, particularly due to their reliance on expert advice. The key points of the judgment are¹: – *Reasonable Explanation*: The petitioner provided a valid explanation that was accepted by the court. – *Reliance on Expert Advice*: The petitioner’s actions were guided by expert advice, which contributed to the court’s favorable view. – *Cancellation of Cancellation Order*: As a result, the court canceled the cancellation order, effectively reversing a previous decision. Without more context about the case, it’s difficult to provide further details. However, this decision suggests that the court valued the petitioner’s transparency and good faith in following expert advice. [12/05, 07:57] sekarreporter1: Case number and order copy
- Meta AI: This appears to be a legal update where: – *Lordship Justice Nakkiran*: Made a decision regarding a review application. – *Division Bench’s Observations*: The judge referenced observations made by a division bench (a panel of two or more judges) in reaching the conclusion.
- Meta AI: This appears to be a court case where: – *Contempt Petition*: A petition was filed against the Chief Secretary and Home Secretary of the Government of Tamil Nadu. – *Fine Imposed*: A fine of ₹5 lakhs was imposed. – *Judges*: The case was heard by MR. JUSTICE R. SUBRAMANIAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE. – *Petitioner*: Elephant G. Rajendran, an advocate, filed the contempt petition
- HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI S.A.(MD)No.559 of 2023 and C.M.P(MD)No.13186 of 2023 The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by The District Collector, Madurai. … Appellant / Appellant / Defendant -Vs-
