Follow:
- Next story THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR C.R.P.PD(MD).Nos.909 and 915 of 2021 and CMP(MD)Nos.5177 and 5178 of 2021 C.R.P.PD(MD).No.909 of 2021 : 1.P.Ganesan : Petitioner/ Respondent Vs. M.Revathy Prema Rubarani : Respondent/ Petitioner PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed Article 227 of Constitution of India, to call for the records pertaining to the petition in DVC.No.26 of 2020 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tirunelveli and set aside the same.
- Previous story Musings on the Life & Times of Chinnaswamy Subramania Bharathi Narasimhan Vijayaraghavan 5
Recent Posts
- [25/06, 17:11] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/i/status/2070100582162178264 [25/06, 17:11] sekarreporter1: DMK MLA Sekar Babu Withdraws Plea For Quashing FIR In Attempt To Murder Case For Allegedly Assaulting TVK Candidate
- [25/06, 16:55] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/i/status/2070095370471068106 [25/06, 16:55] sekarreporter1: காவல்துறைக்கு உத்தரவு பாதுகாப்பு வழங்குவது தொடர்பாக சி.வி.சண்முகம் அளித்த புகார் விவகாரம். வரும் திங்கட்கிழமை விளக்கமளிக்க காவல்துறைக்கு சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவு #cvshanmugam #chennai #highcourt #thanthitv
- Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan of #MadrasHighCourt reserves orders on former DMK Minister K. Ponmudy’s plea to set aside a private complaint lodged against him by Greater Chennai Corporation BJP councillor Uma Anandan for his 2025 offensive speech against Vaishnavites, Saivites, and women in general. @THChennai Backgrounder👇 thehindu.com/news/national/…
- In this case too, a subsequent mention is made by the petitioners’ counsel, post lunch, that he intends to withdraw the petitions seeking transfer of the case. Judge accepts the plea and permits the petitioners to withdraw their petitions. Advocate Richardson Wilson said, the Supreme Court had stayed the trial and therefore, his clients do not wish to proceed further with the transfer plea.
- Implead minister Nirmal kumar in Thirumaran kumaran deepam contempt case Sub application filed [25/06, 15:28] sekarreporter1: Sub appl 207/2026 [25/06, 15:28] sekarreporter1: Madurai [25/06, 15:31] sekarreporter1: 15:31 27.04G KB/S
More
Recent Posts
- [25/06, 17:11] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/i/status/2070100582162178264 [25/06, 17:11] sekarreporter1: DMK MLA Sekar Babu Withdraws Plea For Quashing FIR In Attempt To Murder Case For Allegedly Assaulting TVK Candidate
- [25/06, 16:55] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/i/status/2070095370471068106 [25/06, 16:55] sekarreporter1: காவல்துறைக்கு உத்தரவு பாதுகாப்பு வழங்குவது தொடர்பாக சி.வி.சண்முகம் அளித்த புகார் விவகாரம். வரும் திங்கட்கிழமை விளக்கமளிக்க காவல்துறைக்கு சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவு #cvshanmugam #chennai #highcourt #thanthitv
- Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan of #MadrasHighCourt reserves orders on former DMK Minister K. Ponmudy’s plea to set aside a private complaint lodged against him by Greater Chennai Corporation BJP councillor Uma Anandan for his 2025 offensive speech against Vaishnavites, Saivites, and women in general. @THChennai Backgrounder👇 thehindu.com/news/national/…
- In this case too, a subsequent mention is made by the petitioners’ counsel, post lunch, that he intends to withdraw the petitions seeking transfer of the case. Judge accepts the plea and permits the petitioners to withdraw their petitions. Advocate Richardson Wilson said, the Supreme Court had stayed the trial and therefore, his clients do not wish to proceed further with the transfer plea.
- Implead minister Nirmal kumar in Thirumaran kumaran deepam contempt case Sub application filed [25/06, 15:28] sekarreporter1: Sub appl 207/2026 [25/06, 15:28] sekarreporter1: Madurai [25/06, 15:31] sekarreporter1: 15:31 27.04G KB/S
Chennai to instruct the Executive Engineer, Public Works Department (Buildings), C&M Division, Salem to stop all construction activities of construction of State Level Cooperative Training Institute at Semmavaduvu Village, Manjakuttai Panchayat, Yercaud Taluk, Salem District. It has been further stated in the said order that, the Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Salem also can be instructed that any further expenses in this regard would not be permitted. 2. Except this, nothing has been stated in the impugned order. Therefore, questioning this order the present writ petition has been filed. Mr.Arvind Pandian, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner has contended that, the Government already sanctioned Rs.61.80 Crores for construction of such Institute, pursuant to which the construction was going on. While that being so, all of a sudden now the stop construction order has since been issued, which is impugned herein, the reason for taking such a decision at Government level or Department level is not known to anyone and that has not been spelt out in the order, and in order to know the reasons and testify the same, the learned Senior Counsel seeks the indulgence of this Court. W.P. N o. 2 3 3 6 9 of 2021 R. SURESH KUMAR , J. kst 3. Considering the aforesaid aspect, this Court also feels that the respondents shall file a status report with concerned documents to establish that a Government level or Department level decision has been taken in this regard, pursuant to which 08.11.2021 KST