Follow:
- Next story THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR C.R.P.PD(MD).Nos.909 and 915 of 2021 and CMP(MD)Nos.5177 and 5178 of 2021 C.R.P.PD(MD).No.909 of 2021 : 1.P.Ganesan : Petitioner/ Respondent Vs. M.Revathy Prema Rubarani : Respondent/ Petitioner PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed Article 227 of Constitution of India, to call for the records pertaining to the petition in DVC.No.26 of 2020 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tirunelveli and set aside the same.
- Previous story Musings on the Life & Times of Chinnaswamy Subramania Bharathi Narasimhan Vijayaraghavan 5
Recent Posts
- sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxQ009DiA1fzNCR8n67KDT-kzQw3uNTNDo?si=hRXH_KO-GXGtERoN [18/04, 17:57] sekarreporter1: [17/04, 21:06] sekarreporter1: [17/04, 21:00] Lita Srinivasan: “Dangle the carrot” 50% of the population is women . 50% representation of women in legislature is fundamental to political empowerment.
- Case Filed Against ADMK for Distributing ‘Cheque-like’ Pamphlets of ₹2,000, ₹10,000 – Madras HC* *Petitioner*: Advocate Sundara Vadivel, Perungudi, Chennai *Filed in*: Madras High Court *Issue*: Alleged corrupt practice during 2026 Assembly election campaign
- Cases Against Former ADMK Ministers – PMLA Plea in Madras HC* *Petitioner*: R. Girirajan, DMK Rajya Sabha MP *Hearing*: Listed for Monday *Bench*: Chief Justice S.A. Dharmadhikari, Justice G. Arulmurugan
- Judge Baratha chakraverthy / the deceased Murugan’s old mother. The process of law for registration of documents and the writ jurisdiction cannot be abused to grab property and defeat the rights of others. This purchaser making this kind of purchase is simply shocking the conscience of the Court.
- Order setaside THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 13561 of 2022 AND WMP NO. 12759 OF 2022,WMP NO. 12760 OF 2022, WMP NO. 12761 OF 2022 Delphina Consultants LLP,
More
Recent Posts
- sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxQ009DiA1fzNCR8n67KDT-kzQw3uNTNDo?si=hRXH_KO-GXGtERoN [18/04, 17:57] sekarreporter1: [17/04, 21:06] sekarreporter1: [17/04, 21:00] Lita Srinivasan: “Dangle the carrot” 50% of the population is women . 50% representation of women in legislature is fundamental to political empowerment.
- Case Filed Against ADMK for Distributing ‘Cheque-like’ Pamphlets of ₹2,000, ₹10,000 – Madras HC* *Petitioner*: Advocate Sundara Vadivel, Perungudi, Chennai *Filed in*: Madras High Court *Issue*: Alleged corrupt practice during 2026 Assembly election campaign
- Cases Against Former ADMK Ministers – PMLA Plea in Madras HC* *Petitioner*: R. Girirajan, DMK Rajya Sabha MP *Hearing*: Listed for Monday *Bench*: Chief Justice S.A. Dharmadhikari, Justice G. Arulmurugan
- Judge Baratha chakraverthy / the deceased Murugan’s old mother. The process of law for registration of documents and the writ jurisdiction cannot be abused to grab property and defeat the rights of others. This purchaser making this kind of purchase is simply shocking the conscience of the Court.
- Order setaside THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 13561 of 2022 AND WMP NO. 12759 OF 2022,WMP NO. 12760 OF 2022, WMP NO. 12761 OF 2022 Delphina Consultants LLP,
Chennai to instruct the Executive Engineer, Public Works Department (Buildings), C&M Division, Salem to stop all construction activities of construction of State Level Cooperative Training Institute at Semmavaduvu Village, Manjakuttai Panchayat, Yercaud Taluk, Salem District. It has been further stated in the said order that, the Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Salem also can be instructed that any further expenses in this regard would not be permitted. 2. Except this, nothing has been stated in the impugned order. Therefore, questioning this order the present writ petition has been filed. Mr.Arvind Pandian, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner has contended that, the Government already sanctioned Rs.61.80 Crores for construction of such Institute, pursuant to which the construction was going on. While that being so, all of a sudden now the stop construction order has since been issued, which is impugned herein, the reason for taking such a decision at Government level or Department level is not known to anyone and that has not been spelt out in the order, and in order to know the reasons and testify the same, the learned Senior Counsel seeks the indulgence of this Court. W.P. N o. 2 3 3 6 9 of 2021 R. SURESH KUMAR , J. kst 3. Considering the aforesaid aspect, this Court also feels that the respondents shall file a status report with concerned documents to establish that a Government level or Department level decision has been taken in this regard, pursuant to which 08.11.2021 KST