SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

His lordship SVNJ order was upheld by First bench regarding transport conductor,s double duty service considered as 2 days duty , S.N.Ravichandran full order

by · Published · Updated

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21.03.2022
CORAM :
THE HON’BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
W.A.No.612 of 2022
1.The Managing Director,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation,
Villupuram Limited,
3/137, Salai Medu, Vazhuthareddy Post, Villupuram – 602 605.
2.The General Manager,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Vellore.
3.The General Manager,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation,
Vaingall,
Tiruvannamalai District.
Vs .. Appellants
R.Bharanidaran .. Respondent

Prayer : Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the common interim order 09.09.2021 in W.P.No.24363 of 2019.
For the Appellants : Mr.G.Saravanan for M/s.S.Mishra Sathya Seeman
For the Respondent : Mr.S.N.Ravichandran
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by the Hon’ble Chief Justice)
After arguing the appeal for some length, learned counsel for the appellants, on instructions, did not press the appeal for the reason that
this Court was inclined to extend the time for compliance of the judgment and, accordingly, the non-appellant/writ petitioner shall report for work before the second appellant/The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Vellore on 01.04.2022 as against 01.10.2021 stipulated by the learned Single Judge. The second appellant is directed to accept the joining of the nonappellant/writ petitioner and, accordingly, the non-appellant/writ
petitioner would be assigned work.
2. The non-appellant/writ petitioner would be entitled to the benefits as given by the learned Single Judge, however, without the entitlement of the actual monetary benefits for the intervening period. In case of non-compliance, the non-appellant/writ petitioner would be at liberty to take the legal recourse as available to him, which includes
filing of the contempt petition.
3. With the aforesaid modification, the finding on merit is not interfered. However, the appeal is disposed of with the aforesaid. There will be no order as to costs. Consequently, C.M.P.No.4344 of 2022 is closed.
(M.N.B., CJ) (D.B.C., J.)
21.03.2022
Index : Yes/No bbr
To
1.The Managing Director,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation,
Villupuram Limited, 3/137, Salai Medu, Vazhuthareddy Post, Villupuram – 602 605.
2.The General Manager,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Vellore.
3.The General Manager,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Vaingall, Tiruvannamalai District.
THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
bbr

W.A.No.612 of 2022

21.03.2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21.03.2022
CORAM :
THE HON’BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
W.A.No.612 of 2022
1.The Managing Director,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation,
Villupuram Limited,
3/137, Salai Medu, Vazhuthareddy Post, Villupuram – 602 605.
2.The General Manager,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Vellore.
3.The General Manager,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation,
Vaingall,
Tiruvannamalai District.
Vs .. Appellants
R.Bharanidaran .. Respondent

Prayer : Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the common interim order 09.09.2021 in W.P.No.24363 of 2019.
For the Appellants : Mr.G.Saravanan for M/s.S.Mishra Sathya Seeman
For the Respondent : Mr.S.N.Ravichandran
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by the Hon’ble Chief Justice)
After arguing the appeal for some length, learned counsel for the appellants, on instructions, did not press the appeal for the reason that
this Court was inclined to extend the time for compliance of the judgment and, accordingly, the non-appellant/writ petitioner shall report for work before the second appellant/The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Vellore on 01.04.2022 as against 01.10.2021 stipulated by the learned Single Judge. The second appellant is directed to accept the joining of the nonappellant/writ petitioner and, accordingly, the non-appellant/writ
petitioner would be assigned work.
2. The non-appellant/writ petitioner would be entitled to the benefits as given by the learned Single Judge, however, without the entitlement of the actual monetary benefits for the intervening period. In case of non-compliance, the non-appellant/writ petitioner would be at liberty to take the legal recourse as available to him, which includes
filing of the contempt petition.
3. With the aforesaid modification, the finding on merit is not interfered. However, the appeal is disposed of with the aforesaid. There will be no order as to costs. Consequently, C.M.P.No.4344 of 2022 is closed.
(M.N.B., CJ) (D.B.C., J.)
21.03.2022
Index : Yes/No bbr
To
1.The Managing Director,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation,
Villupuram Limited, 3/137, Salai Medu, Vazhuthareddy Post, Villupuram – 602 605.
2.The General Manager,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Vellore.
3.The General Manager,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Vaingall, Tiruvannamalai District.
THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
bbr

W.A.No.612 of 2022
21.03.2022

You may also like...