Gambling with stakes not illegal: Madras HC https://t.co/nQLr00ATuY via @timesofindia
Gambling with stakes not illegal: Madras HC https://t.co/nQLr00ATuY via @timesofindia
Follow:
- Next story https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1209016946320007168?s=08 [12/23, 13:17] Sekarreporter 1: [12/23, 13:13] Sekarreporter 1: Good morning friends A BOOK “JOURNEY OF CIVILISATION Indus to vaigai” written retired IAS Officer Mr R Balakrishnan states by giving proof that Indus Civilisation is Diravidan Civilisation. This book is result of his thirty years research. [12/23, 13:13] Sekarreporter 1: The author R Balakrishnan is the first Candidate to write in Tamil and cleared IAS Examination👏 [12/23, 13:13] Sekarreporter 1: We should buy the book and ask our friends also to buy and read the book.
- Previous story Gambling with stakes not illegal: Madras HC https://t.co/nQLr00ATuY via @timesofindia
Recent Posts
- *Madras High Court* – *Judge:* Justice N Senthil Kumar – *Parties:* – Mythri Movie Makers vs. Ilaiyaraaja – Dr. Ilaiyaraaja vs. Mythri Movie Makers and 2 Others – *Date of Order:* Not specified – *Counsel:* – Mythri Movie Makers: M/s. Rahul Balakrishnan – Dr. Ilaiyaraaja: M/s. Thyagarajan K, A. Saravanan, S. Magaimairaaj – Respondents: M/s. Jidesh Kumar, Navod Prasannan, Vijay R Sekar, Akalya Ravichandran, G. Lakshmi Prathista Reddy, RV. Che Guvera, Dhakshin Kumar – *Court Observation:* The case is listed for pronouncing orders.
- National Green Tribunal (NGT)* – *Bench:* Not specified – *Parties:* J. Brezhnev vs. Union Ministry of Environment and 7 Others – *Date of Order:* Not specified – *Counsel:* – Petitioner: M/s. S. Tamil Selvan, R.S. Selva, P. Praveen, Samadhanam S. Prasath – Respondents: – R1: M/s. Dr. G. Babu (CG SR PC) – R2: A. Edwin Prabhakar (State Govt. Pleader) – R3: Smt. P. Veena Suresh (Standing Counsel) – R4-R7: K. Karthik Jagannath (Govt.) – *Court Observation:* The case is listed with appearances from various counsel for the respondents.
- *Madras High Court* – *Judges:* Chief Justice M.M. Srivastava and Justice G. Arulmurugan – *Parties:* Rangarajan Narasimhan vs. The State – *Date of Order:* Not specified – *Counsel:* – Petitioner: Not specified – Respondent: Additional Government Advocate Rajtilak – *Court Observation:* The court directed the police to respond within 3 weeks to a petition seeking a special investigation team probe into an alleged attempt to steal a gold lizard idol from the Kancheepuram Varadaraja Perumal Temple.
- Madras High Court (Madurai Bench)* – *Judge:* Justice K. Kumaresh Babu – *Parties:* [Not specified in the news report] ( likely the family of the deceased vs. Tangedco) – *Date of Order:* December 2, 2025 – *Counsel:* Not specified – *Court Observation:* The court directed Tangedco to pay ₹20 lakh as compensation to the family of a man who was electrocuted while working on an electric pole installation without proper authorization. The court noted that a Tangedco foreman had engaged the deceased without permission, and the foreman was subsequently suspended and punished
- Head notes Madras High Court* – *Judge:* Justice N. Senthilkumar – *Parties:* Nannir Water Source LLP (Petitioner) vs. YouTube LLC and Syed Imran and Syed Abbas (Respondents) – *Date of Order:* December 2, 2025 – *Counsel:* – For Petitioner: Not specified – For Respondents: Not specified – *Court Observation:* The court directed YouTube LLC to block a video review of a water energiser on the ‘Buying Facts’ channel, stating that YouTubers cannot damage a company’s reputation under the guise of reviewing products. An interim injunction was also granted, restraining the channel from circulating the review.
More
Recent Posts
- *Madras High Court* – *Judge:* Justice N Senthil Kumar – *Parties:* – Mythri Movie Makers vs. Ilaiyaraaja – Dr. Ilaiyaraaja vs. Mythri Movie Makers and 2 Others – *Date of Order:* Not specified – *Counsel:* – Mythri Movie Makers: M/s. Rahul Balakrishnan – Dr. Ilaiyaraaja: M/s. Thyagarajan K, A. Saravanan, S. Magaimairaaj – Respondents: M/s. Jidesh Kumar, Navod Prasannan, Vijay R Sekar, Akalya Ravichandran, G. Lakshmi Prathista Reddy, RV. Che Guvera, Dhakshin Kumar – *Court Observation:* The case is listed for pronouncing orders.
- National Green Tribunal (NGT)* – *Bench:* Not specified – *Parties:* J. Brezhnev vs. Union Ministry of Environment and 7 Others – *Date of Order:* Not specified – *Counsel:* – Petitioner: M/s. S. Tamil Selvan, R.S. Selva, P. Praveen, Samadhanam S. Prasath – Respondents: – R1: M/s. Dr. G. Babu (CG SR PC) – R2: A. Edwin Prabhakar (State Govt. Pleader) – R3: Smt. P. Veena Suresh (Standing Counsel) – R4-R7: K. Karthik Jagannath (Govt.) – *Court Observation:* The case is listed with appearances from various counsel for the respondents.
- *Madras High Court* – *Judges:* Chief Justice M.M. Srivastava and Justice G. Arulmurugan – *Parties:* Rangarajan Narasimhan vs. The State – *Date of Order:* Not specified – *Counsel:* – Petitioner: Not specified – Respondent: Additional Government Advocate Rajtilak – *Court Observation:* The court directed the police to respond within 3 weeks to a petition seeking a special investigation team probe into an alleged attempt to steal a gold lizard idol from the Kancheepuram Varadaraja Perumal Temple.
- Madras High Court (Madurai Bench)* – *Judge:* Justice K. Kumaresh Babu – *Parties:* [Not specified in the news report] ( likely the family of the deceased vs. Tangedco) – *Date of Order:* December 2, 2025 – *Counsel:* Not specified – *Court Observation:* The court directed Tangedco to pay ₹20 lakh as compensation to the family of a man who was electrocuted while working on an electric pole installation without proper authorization. The court noted that a Tangedco foreman had engaged the deceased without permission, and the foreman was subsequently suspended and punished
- Head notes Madras High Court* – *Judge:* Justice N. Senthilkumar – *Parties:* Nannir Water Source LLP (Petitioner) vs. YouTube LLC and Syed Imran and Syed Abbas (Respondents) – *Date of Order:* December 2, 2025 – *Counsel:* – For Petitioner: Not specified – For Respondents: Not specified – *Court Observation:* The court directed YouTube LLC to block a video review of a water energiser on the ‘Buying Facts’ channel, stating that YouTubers cannot damage a company’s reputation under the guise of reviewing products. An interim injunction was also granted, restraining the channel from circulating the review.