• GST: Top 30 High Court Judgments in 2019
• CBDT again extends due date for linking of Aadhaar with PAN till March 31, 2020
• Prohibition of Benami Property Act is still in Force, not Replaced: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Judgment]
• Appeal can’t be dismissed for want of Delay if it was due to Non-Receipt of Order-in-Original: Rajasthan HC [Read Judgment]
• Assessee can Produce Third Parties before AO to dispute Documentary Evidence found during Search: ITAT [Read Order]
• Addition made on the basis of Presumption is not Justifiable: ITAT [Read Order]
• Supply of Mixture and Dough of Wheat Flour, Sugar and Water, cut into specific shape, which is dried and hardened by heating attracts 28% GST: AAR [Read Order]
• ‘First Offenders’ won’t get relaxation in case of Customs Duty Evasion / Prohibition: Madras HC [Read Order]
• Residential Status of Beneficiaries relevant to determine Treaty Benefits of Tax Transparent Entities: ITAT [Read Order]
• Companies Act Provisions on Disqualification and Vacation of Directorship can’t be applied Retrospectively: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

EXCISE & CUSTOMS | HEADLINES | TOP STORIES

‘First Offenders’ won’t get relaxation in case of Customs Duty Evasion / Prohibition: Madras HC [Read Order]

December 30, 2019 7:22 am| By : Akshi Narula 

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court in the case of Assistant Commissioner of Customs v Navaskhanheld that the matter needs to be remanded back to JM for fresh consideration since the ground of being the ‘first offenders’ does not come within the ambit of Section 135(3)(1).

The present petition is filed against the order of the learned Judicial Magistrate sentencing the respondent to convict him imprisonment till the rising of court and imposed a fine of Rs 15,000 in default of payment, one-month simple imprisonment under Section 241 of Cr.P.C. convicted under clause 3 of Section 135.

The complainant submitted that the JM has passed order sentencing the respondent only on the ground that he was the first offenders.

The Court by way of single bench constituting of Justice V. Parthiban remanded back the matter to the Judicial Magistrate for fresh consideration and passing orders in terms of Section 135 of the Customs Act, 1962 within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of copy of the present order for the reason that the ground for sentencing i.e. being ‘first offender’ does not come within the ambit of Section 135(3)(1). The provision specifically excludes that the first time offender need not be shown any leniency by imposi