Employee can’t claim over Rs 8,000 if injured while in service: Madras HC svnj by Sekar Reporter · January 29, 2020 HomeMarketsCompaniesOpinionTechSpecialsPFPortfolioMultimediaBudget 2020SportsElectionsHome«BackEmployee can’t claim over Rs 8,000 if injured while in service: Madras HCPress Trust of India | Madurai | Last Updated at January 28 2020 21:38 ISTRepresentative ImageThe Madras High Court on Tuesday ruled that no one injured permanently while in service can claim over Rs 8,000 per month, even if he or she were drawing over the amount as salary.Justice S Vaidyanathan cited a government order (GO) issued under the Minimum Wages Act while rejecting an appeal of Sekar against the order of the Joint Commissioner of Labour who awarded a compensation of Rs 8,000 as wages instead of fixing 100 per cent of his last drawn wages.According to the GO, even if the salary of a person permanently injured while working exceeds Rs 8,000, the compensation should be fixed as if the monthlywages were only Rs 8,000 and not above.Though a new notification has been issued by the central governmenton January 3, 2020 enhancing the monthly wages for such persons from Rs 8,000 to Rs 15,000, the increased amount cannot be given to the appellant as the notification issued on May 31, 2010 had fixed the monthly wages as Rs 8,000 at the time of accident.Justice Vaidyanathan of the court’s Madurai bench said the issue raised on enhancement of wages had been rightly answered by the authority and the court finds no reason whatsoever to interfere with the finding and rejected the appeal.The court cannot exercise the legislative powers and fix any amount, as it thinks it fit on account of the fact that the claim does not fall under the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act, the judge said.The petitioner, who worked in the State Express Transport Corporation, submitted that the wages should be taken as Rs 12,000 which he was earning while fixing the wages, but the judge rejected the appeal.
Madras High Court J. Jayalalitha vs Arcot N. Veerasamy on 30 April, 1997 Bench: M Karpagavinayagam ORDER 1. The petitioner Selvi J. Jayalalitha, is a former Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu. She filed a complaintagainst the respondent/accused Mr. Arcot N. Veerasamy, who is presently a Minister in Tamil Nadu March 27, 2022 by Sekar Reporter · Published March 27, 2022
Durai Arun: A good attempt to change the practice of treating the perpetrator’s family as criminals too. தன்னுடைய தந்தையோ, கணவரோ செய்யும் தவறுக்கு தான் எப்படி பொறுப்பாக முடியும்? அதற்காக வாழ் நாள் முழுவதும் தண்டனையை அனுபவிக்க வேண்டும் என்பது ஏற்புடைதல்ல. March 3, 2023 by Sekar Reporter · Published March 3, 2023
Sekarreporter: l[6/21, 06:35] Judge Suthantheram: Dear Sekar, I am sending an order of Division Bench of Madras High Court and well written comment about that order in Live Law by Mr. Lakshminarayanan, Advocate. Kindly post them for the knowledge of others. [6/21, 06:36] Judge Suthantheram: https://www.livelaw.in/amp/columns/cant-a-single-bench-of-high-court-issue-directions-to-registry-to-circulate-a June 21, 2021 by Sekar Reporter · Published June 21, 2021