Eight Dj elevation case SC full order
MENU
Eight Dj elevation case SC full order ITEM NO.25 COURT NO.1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 1172/2019 R. POORNIMA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION) Date :06-12-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Kaustubh Shukla, Adv. Mr. Abhay Singh, Adv. Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick, AOR Ms. Manisha Pandey, Adv. Ms. Ankita Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Kunal Mallick, Adv. Mr. Aditya Rajeshwar, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R At the request of Shri Rakesh Dwivedi, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, prayer ‘A’ is allowed to be deleted. Issue notice restricted to the question of the entitlement of the petitioners to be considered by virtue of having put in 18 years, as claimed. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted. [ CHARANJEET KAUR ] [ INDU KUMARI POKHRIYAL ] A.R.-CUM-P.S. ASSTT. REGISTRAR
ITEM NO.25 COURT NO.1 SECTION X
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 1172/2019
R. POORNIMA & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION)
Date :06-12-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Kaustubh Shukla, Adv.
Mr. Abhay Singh, Adv.
Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick, AOR
Ms. Manisha Pandey, Adv.
Ms. Ankita Agarwal, Adv.
Mr. Kunal Mallick, Adv.
Mr. Aditya Rajeshwar, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
At the request of Shri Rakesh Dwivedi, learned
senior counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioners, prayer ‘A’ is allowed to be deleted.
Issue notice restricted to the question of the
entitlement of the petitioners to be considered by
virtue of having put in 18 years, as claimed.
Dasti service, in addition, is permitted.
[ CHARANJEET KAUR ] [ INDU KUMARI POKHRIYAL ]
A.R.-CUM-P.S. ASSTT. REGISTRAR
Author: sekarreporter
9445430817 View all posts by sekarreporter
Author sekarreporterPosted onDecember 13, 2019CategoriesUncategorized
Leave a Reply
Logged in as sekarreporter. Log out?
COMMENT
Notify me of new comments via email.
Notify me of new posts via email.
Post navigation
PREVIOUSPrevious post:Watch “ஐஐடி மாணவி வழக்கு – சிபிஐ விசாரணை கோரிய மனு தள்ளுபடி” on YouTube
RECENT POSTS
Eight Dj elevation case SC full order ITEM NO.25 COURT NO.1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 1172/2019 R. POORNIMA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION) Date :06-12-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Kaustubh Shukla, Adv. Mr. Abhay Singh, Adv. Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick, AOR Ms. Manisha Pandey, Adv. Ms. Ankita Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Kunal Mallick, Adv. Mr. Aditya Rajeshwar, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R At the request of Shri Rakesh Dwivedi, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, prayer ‘A’ is allowed to be deleted. Issue notice restricted to the question of the entitlement of the petitioners to be considered by virtue of having put in 18 years, as claimed. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted. [ CHARANJEET KAUR ] [ INDU KUMARI POKHRIYAL ] A.R.-CUM-P.S. ASSTT. REGISTRARDecember 13, 2019
Watch “ஐஐடி மாணவி வழக்கு – சிபிஐ விசாரணை கோரிய மனு தள்ளுபடி” on YouTubeDecember 13, 2019
Eight district judges move SC to get elevated as HC judgesDecember 13, 2019
Madras HC dismisses PIL petition filed by National Students Union of India seeking CBI investigation in the death of IIT student Fathima Lateef. [12/13, 11:18] Sekarreporter: Court directs IIT management to provide psychological counselling to the students.December 13, 2019
Holding that a demand of Rs 50,000 for buying household articles for establishing a separate family cannot be construed as a demand of dowry, the Madras High Court has quashed the orders of a lower court (Mahalir Nedhimandram) in the city. Accepting the arguments of senior advocate K Doraisamy, Justice P N Prakash ordered the acquittal of Sakthi, the husband, Muthuraj and Neela (parents-in-law) of the deceased Kalpana, recently.December 13, 2019
TEXT WIDGET
This is a text widget. The Text Widget allows you to add text or HTML to your sidebar. You can use a text widget to display text, links, images, HTML, or a combination of these. Edit them in the Widget section of the Customizer.
Search for:
SEARCH
Home
About
Contact
Google+
GitHub
WordPress.com
sekarreporter.com 9445430817 Blog at WordPress.com.
