You may also like...
-
COMMON JUDGMENT D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARHY, J. The petitioner is an association registered under the Societies Therefore, the present Writ Appeal and Writ Petitions are dismissed and we reiterate the earlier judgment in W.A.No.2895 of 2019, dated 28.08.2019. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, considering the fact that already in the earlier round, a sum of Rs.1,00,000/was imposed as costs, we refrain from imposing exemplary costs on the petitioner. Consequently, C.M.P.No.2516 of 2022, W.M.P.Nos.12202 of 2021 and 3619 of 2021 are closed. (M.N.B., CJ) (D.B.C., J.) For Appellant : Mr.S.Selva Thirumurugan For Respondents : Mr.P.S.Raman, Senior Counsel for Mr.Rahul Balaji, for R1 : M/s. Ramalingam & Associates, for R2 : Mrs.M.Sneha, for R3 In W.P.No.11467 of 2021 For Petitioner : Mr.S.Selva Thirumurugan For Respondents : Mr.B.Rabu Manohar, Central Government Senior Panel Counsel for R1 : Mr.P.Muthukumar, State Government Pleader for RR-4 and 8 : Ms.Shubharanjani Ananth, Standing Counsel for RR-2 and 3
by Sekar Reporter · Published August 18, 2022
-
Residents can maintain land earmarked for park, says HC
by Sekar Reporter · Published December 28, 2020
-
Poesgarden case mhc new order
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 19, 2021