Skip to content

Search for:

Home
Gallery
Contact Us

Court News from Madras High Court

Home
Gallery
Contact Us

Uncategorized

Dj exam class today evening

by Sekar Reporter · July 18, 2020

[7/18, 15:00] Chandrasekar Mhc Advt: CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY
inviting you to a lecture on
DISTRICT JUDGE EXAMINATION – 2020
Subject : The Tamil nadu state criminal minor acts
Title: The Tamil Nadu Prize Schemes (Prohibition) Act, 1979
BY: R. CHANDRASEKARAN ADVOCATE
Date: 18th July 2020
Saturday
Timing: 4:30 to 6.00pm
For contact whats app.
No: 73396 50446
[7/18, 15:00] Chandrasekar Mhc Advt: CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY
inviting you to a lecture on
Subject The Tamil nadu state criminal minor acts
Title: The Tamil Nadu Property (Prevention of Damage and Loss) Act, 1992
BY: R. CHANDRASEKARAN ADVOCATE
Date: 18th July 2020
Saturday
Timing: 7:00 to 8.30pm
For contact whats app.
No: 73396 50446

You may also like...

சிபிஐ வக்கீல் சந்திரசேகர் சாருக்கு அருமையான வாழ.த்து மடல் படியுங்கள் 80 லிலும் கர் ஜிக்கும்சிம்ம குரல்

August 1, 2021

by Sekar Reporter · Published August 1, 2021
[6/29, 09:32] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/m4ArIi9RMeg [7/2, 19:55] sekarreporter1: [7/2, 19:54] sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1675510652738375683?t=1Ey2Ky7JImDFs1Scx75JOg&s=08 [7/2, 19:54] sekarreporter1: [7/2, 19:39] App Chandresekar New: *CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY* Inviting you to *WEEKLY TEST* *JUDICIAL EXAMINATIONS* *SUBJECT: THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT,1882* *Date : 03 JULY 2023* *Timing*: 10:00am to 12:30 pm *CONTACT NO : 7339650446* *NOTE :* AFTER TEST *LUNCH* WILL BE PROVIDED TO RESPECTED ASPIRANTS 💐 [7/2, 19:53] sekarreporter1: 💐💐

July 2, 2023

by Sekar Reporter · Published July 2, 2023
Complaint do not constitute an offense under section 5 of copta Act. Criminal complaint under against Actor Dhanush and Aishwarya Rajinikanth quashed

July 10, 2023

by Sekar Reporter · Published July 10, 2023

Follow:

Next story Sc mhc tips news video www.Sekarreporter.com
Previous story Chennai: The controversial drug of yoga guru Ramdev’s Patanjali Ayurved Ltd – Coronil- which is claimed as a cure for COVID-19, has received a blow with the Madras High Court restraining the company from using the trademark ”Coronil”. Justice CV Karthikeyan passed the interim order valid till July 30 on the plea of Chennai-based company Arudra Engineering Private Limited which has claimed that ”Coronil” is a trademark owned by it since 1993.

Search for:

Recent Posts

20/04, 18:32] Senior Advt Wilson: https://x.com/pwilsondmk/status/1781668440492986773?s=46relax Model Code of Conduct[20/04, 18:32] sekarreporter1: The voting for Parliamentary Elections 2024 have been completed in certain states, such as Tamil Nadu. Therefore, the @ECISVEEP Election Commission of India should consider relaxing the Model Code of Conduct in these states to enable them to carry out their functions without hindrance, including welfare measures, new policies, recruitment, etc. Freezing the state government activities until June 4th is like suspending democracy for no valid reasons and punishing the people. Currently, people are not allowed to carry cash of more than 50k within the states. The decision to continue the same Model Code of Conduct in these States appears highly arbitrary and unjustified.
The first bench of Chief Justice SV Gangapurwala and Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy recently dismissed the petitions filed by the Employers’ Federation of Southern India and industrial houses including KCP Limited, Sundaram Clayton Limited and Rane Engine Valve Limited, saying that no vested interests of the petitioners were affected by the Payment of Bonus (Amendment) Act, 2015.
Today 6 law tips / [20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2015 (6) SCC 287 : Priyanka srivastava vs state of UP : when a borrower of financial institution covered under the SARFASI act , invokes jurisdiction under sec 156 (3) CRPC and also there is a separate procedure under Recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions act , an attitude of more care , caution and circumspection has to be adhered to[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: Supreme court judgement: SLP ( civil ) No 9496 of 2020 dated 4- 02 – 2022 Ajanta LLP vs casino keisanki kabushiki computer ltd : consent decree cannot be modified / altered unless the mistake is patent or obvious mistake ( order 23 rule 3 CPC 1908 )[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) SCC 39 ; Joseph shine vs union.of india : A bench disagreeing with decision.of a larger or coequal bench can only refer the matter to a larger bench , it cannot disagree or dissent[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: Supreme court: civil.appeal no 363 of 2022 dated 10- 02 – 2022 Bank of baroda vs M / S karwa trading company and another : In a SARFASI proceedings , unless and until borrower ready to deposit / pay entire amount payable together with all costs and expenses with secured creditor , borrower cannot be discharged from entire liability outstanding[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2021 (1) CTC 830 : saradhammal vs sankaralingam : Held transfer of immovable property under attachment with knowledge of attachment vitiates transfer ( sec 52 transfer of property act 1882 )[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2011 (7) SCC 69 : Amar singh vs union of india : Held litigants must observe total clarity and candour in their pleadings especially when it contains a prayer for injunction ( order 39 rule 1 & 2 CPC 1908 )
[20/04, 11:34] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1781564360177209576?t=ijXt2lW-UwiEB44RJHBZCg&s=08[20/04, 11:34] sekarreporter1: K Parasaran book Launch function vadapalani chennai today evening 5.30 thanjai sastra college chennai campus
Juniors of Senior Govindaswinathan award function[20/04, 11:15] sekarreporter1: Juniors of late Senior adv Govindaswinathan award function held Sunday naradaganasaba 10.30 morning

More

Recent Posts

20/04, 18:32] Senior Advt Wilson: https://x.com/pwilsondmk/status/1781668440492986773?s=46relax Model Code of Conduct[20/04, 18:32] sekarreporter1: The voting for Parliamentary Elections 2024 have been completed in certain states, such as Tamil Nadu. Therefore, the @ECISVEEP Election Commission of India should consider relaxing the Model Code of Conduct in these states to enable them to carry out their functions without hindrance, including welfare measures, new policies, recruitment, etc. Freezing the state government activities until June 4th is like suspending democracy for no valid reasons and punishing the people. Currently, people are not allowed to carry cash of more than 50k within the states. The decision to continue the same Model Code of Conduct in these States appears highly arbitrary and unjustified.
The first bench of Chief Justice SV Gangapurwala and Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy recently dismissed the petitions filed by the Employers’ Federation of Southern India and industrial houses including KCP Limited, Sundaram Clayton Limited and Rane Engine Valve Limited, saying that no vested interests of the petitioners were affected by the Payment of Bonus (Amendment) Act, 2015.
Today 6 law tips / [20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2015 (6) SCC 287 : Priyanka srivastava vs state of UP : when a borrower of financial institution covered under the SARFASI act , invokes jurisdiction under sec 156 (3) CRPC and also there is a separate procedure under Recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions act , an attitude of more care , caution and circumspection has to be adhered to[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: Supreme court judgement: SLP ( civil ) No 9496 of 2020 dated 4- 02 – 2022 Ajanta LLP vs casino keisanki kabushiki computer ltd : consent decree cannot be modified / altered unless the mistake is patent or obvious mistake ( order 23 rule 3 CPC 1908 )[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) SCC 39 ; Joseph shine vs union.of india : A bench disagreeing with decision.of a larger or coequal bench can only refer the matter to a larger bench , it cannot disagree or dissent[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: Supreme court: civil.appeal no 363 of 2022 dated 10- 02 – 2022 Bank of baroda vs M / S karwa trading company and another : In a SARFASI proceedings , unless and until borrower ready to deposit / pay entire amount payable together with all costs and expenses with secured creditor , borrower cannot be discharged from entire liability outstanding[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2021 (1) CTC 830 : saradhammal vs sankaralingam : Held transfer of immovable property under attachment with knowledge of attachment vitiates transfer ( sec 52 transfer of property act 1882 )[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2011 (7) SCC 69 : Amar singh vs union of india : Held litigants must observe total clarity and candour in their pleadings especially when it contains a prayer for injunction ( order 39 rule 1 & 2 CPC 1908 )
[20/04, 11:34] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1781564360177209576?t=ijXt2lW-UwiEB44RJHBZCg&s=08[20/04, 11:34] sekarreporter1: K Parasaran book Launch function vadapalani chennai today evening 5.30 thanjai sastra college chennai campus
Juniors of Senior Govindaswinathan award function[20/04, 11:15] sekarreporter1: Juniors of late Senior adv Govindaswinathan award function held Sunday naradaganasaba 10.30 morning

SEKAR REPORTER © 2024. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by - Designed with the Hueman theme