You may also like...
-
MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.P.No.24967 of 2018 and W.M.P.Nos.29011 & 29012 of 2018 “But in the present case, it is not in dispute that the Central Government has partially approved the recommendation of the CCH, dated 11.07.2018, stating that ‘recommended for allowing admission in I-BHMS course for the session 2018-19 with intake capacity allowed earlier subject to the removal of deficiencies reflected in the report of the inspection on or before 31.12.2018. Mr.G.Masilamani, Senior Counsel for Mr.D.Prabhu Mukunth Arunkumar For R1 & 2 : Mr.T.V.Krishnamachari Senior Panel Counsel For R3 : Mr.R.Rajesh Vivekanantham Additional Solicitor General For R4 : Mr.D.Ravichander Special Government Pleader For R5 : Mr.R.Imayavarman for M/s.Ramalingam Associates
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 9, 2022
-
Neet சட்ட சிக்கல் என்ன? வக்கீல் சீனிவாச ராகவன் பேட்டி
by Sekar Reporter · Published December 30, 2021
-
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MR.N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.No.1664 of 2021 and WMP No.1871 of 2021 D.Aswin Rao …Petitioner .Vs. 1.The State rep.by its Additional Chief Secretary, Home Department, Government of Tamilnadu, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009. 2.The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai, Vepery, Chennai 600 007. 3.The State rep.by The Inspector of Police, CCB-IPS, Chennai-CCB District-EDF-I Team-II. ..Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to forbear the 2nd and 3rd respondents from passing order against the petitioner now confining at Central Prison, Puzhal by detaining him under the preventive Detention in particularly Tamil Nadu Act No.14 of 1982. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Prabhakaran Senior Counsel for Mr.R.Krishna Kumar For Respondents : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the Respondents from invoking Act 14 of 1982, against the Petitioner.
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 5, 2021