Follow:
- Next story Justice G R Swaminathan observed that the relationship between the parties is contractual in nature and the rights of the parties will have to be determined in terms of the contract. Citing that there was no force majeure clause in the agreement between the parties, the judge said that in the tender notification, there is a stipulation that the licensee will not be excused from his payment obligation under any circumstance. The judge observed that the court would be justified in treating the lockdown as a force majeure event. The judge said that the GO was issued waiving the rental amount for two months based on the letter sent by the commissioner of municipal administration in June 2020. No one would have anticipated that the lockdown would continue for several more months.
- Previous story Sekarreporter1: [2/6, 19:03] Meera Bar Bench: https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/human-rights-act-decisions-of-human-rights-commission-binding-on-state-madras-high-court [2/6, 19:34] Sekarreporter1: [2/6, 19:36] Sekarreporter1: [2/6, 19:05] Leaf Let Web Paras Nath Singh: https://www.theleaflet.in/recomme
Recent Posts
- MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR A.S.No.586 of 2025 and CMP.No.10580 of 2025 Prema … Appellant
- நீதிபதி திரு சத்யநாராயண பிரசாத் அவர்கள் முன்னிலையில் விசாரணைக்கு வந்தது. மனுதாரர் மற்றும் சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்ற மூத்த வழக்கறிஞர் துரைசாமியின் சார்பில், வழக்கறிஞர் வி. இளங்கோவன் ஆஜரானார். அரசு
- Case quashed against Big boss darsan advocate Thenmoli
- JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR Criminal Appeal Nos.1128 of 2022 and 255 of 2023 and Crl. M.P. No.19507 of 2023 Sanjana … Appellant in Crl.A. No.1128/2022/A2 Balaji … Appellant in Crl.A. No.255/2023/A1 Vs. State represented by Inspector of Police, W-25, All Women Police Station, T. Nagar, Chennai. (Crime No.6/2019) .. Respondent in both the appeals
- THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Crl.A.No.1664 of 2023 and Crl.M.P.No.20268 of 2023 — State Represented by The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Sooramangalam Range, Karuppur Police Station, Salem City,
More
Recent Posts
- MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR A.S.No.586 of 2025 and CMP.No.10580 of 2025 Prema … Appellant
- நீதிபதி திரு சத்யநாராயண பிரசாத் அவர்கள் முன்னிலையில் விசாரணைக்கு வந்தது. மனுதாரர் மற்றும் சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்ற மூத்த வழக்கறிஞர் துரைசாமியின் சார்பில், வழக்கறிஞர் வி. இளங்கோவன் ஆஜரானார். அரசு
- Case quashed against Big boss darsan advocate Thenmoli
- JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR Criminal Appeal Nos.1128 of 2022 and 255 of 2023 and Crl. M.P. No.19507 of 2023 Sanjana … Appellant in Crl.A. No.1128/2022/A2 Balaji … Appellant in Crl.A. No.255/2023/A1 Vs. State represented by Inspector of Police, W-25, All Women Police Station, T. Nagar, Chennai. (Crime No.6/2019) .. Respondent in both the appeals
- THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Crl.A.No.1664 of 2023 and Crl.M.P.No.20268 of 2023 — State Represented by The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Sooramangalam Range, Karuppur Police Station, Salem City,
